HasanAbi
IRAN SUBMITS RESPONSE TO PEACE PROPOSAL!🤬EF DAY 72🤬STRAIT: CLOSED🤬SUNDAY FUNDAY!! MOMS DAY!!
05-10-2026 · 6h 30m
⚠️ VOD is unavailable.
hasanabi VODs on twitchBroadcasts 30+ hours are truncated. View the Raw Transcript VTT for the full version.
First into the atmosphere to rule male voters ahead of 2028, but they'll have to compete
with the digital world's new rising star, far left activist, Hassan Piker.
What I really want is whether it's social media influencers on Twitch and YouTube like Hassan Piker or other kind of promoters of hate.
You must always maintain revolutionary opportunities and you must always continue to organize.
We must always continue to agitate because the quicker we can create enough pressure
that causes the American state to re-calculate its super high-packed with Israel, the quicker
we can save as many Palestinian lives possible.
what's going on everybody I hope everyone's having a fantastic evening afternoon for you
no matter where you are in the world I'm a soundplanker and this is Austin I'm a broadcast
coming to you live from sunny California Los Angeles folks we're live and alive in
California Los Angeles on stolen land it is Sunday fun day folks it is Sunday
May 10th 2026 also known as Sunday fun day normally I wouldn't even broadcast on
a Sunday but it's a very special day for all the mommies out there I'm doing it
for all the y'all okay yeah there's the rotisserie chicken for those of you who
are wondering right behind me. This is the part of the broadcast where I tell you about
my personal news about what's going on in the world of a San Jose, an Ami Piker in between
the time period where I pressed the star shroom and button and press the stop shroom and
button. So help me God. That's what I'm going to do. I'm basically, I'm basically a mom
myself, a dog mom. So, you know, I, I, I kind of understand what it, what it's like to be
mother you know I have the same maternal instincts as many people tell me so you
know we're live we're alive I forfeit my child for stream nice but yeah the
fits have been absolutely crazy thank you thank you very much this is you know
the fits have been fitting and I had that I had to dress up people might say
oh it's Sunday why don't you dress casually but like for the mommies out
there I can't be doing that I can't be doing that for you know you know how it
is you know how it is but folks we're live we're alive and I hope everyone's
having a fantastic one you need a tie here you go what the fuck is this
Sputnik? Sputnik, Nick, Ty, Soviet, Russia, space satellite, Ty.
Anyway, okay, well, I'm live, I'm alive.
This is casual, I don't have a tie on today.
You know, I might even unbutton another button.
You know, like go crazy with it, you know what I mean? Just fucking crazy.
Who knows? Just get slutty with it. Is this slutty? I can't tell.
You're Indiana Jones Maxine. You just need the hat. I was so worried bad news were going
to happen. Uh, that's, yeah, that's why I'm doing it. You run the day care so all the
moms can go get margaritas. True. All right. So anyway, folks, folks, folks, um, that's
I wanted to wish everybody a happy Mother's Day. I'm gonna tell you all about
I'm gonna tell you all about my my situation here
And and the part of the broadcast where I tell you all about my personal news
But what's going on in the world of the Son house and I'll be Piker in between the time period where I press the
Stop streaming button and press the start streaming button last night at the end of the broadcast
And I put on some stuff and I went to the gold gala. I was late. Unfortunately. I
I was late to the gold gal so I didn't get a gold carpet photo
So you won't be able to get you won't be able to see me flaked up
No time I'm supposed to take you to seriously. Yeah, you won't see the full-fit picks unfortunately
I didn't get to do it, but I was there. It was a spectacular event
I as you guys know, I'm not Asian
Well, I guess I'm stretching the upper limit of Asian considering, you know, my Turkish background
I'm considering my Turkish background. I'm, you know, I grew up in the continent, right?
But yeah, it was, it was a fun experience overall. And then I came home. I met a lot of cool people,
came home, passed out, woke up, did a quick basketball session, just a little bit. And then,
And, you know, I had to film the pod.
I had to film the freaking pod.
Oh, wow.
Okay, there are some fit pics.
There are some fit pics out there, it seems.
Yep.
That's it.
I was wearing all Chinese.
All Chinese.
Hasan, let's say you're wearing a suit like a local outfit.
Okay, thank you.
Okay, I need to speak to you now.
Another cool event where you get fitted and get zero photos, you're useless.
Look, there's some fit pics.
Supreme Leader, do you denounce the bald allegations?
I mean, you can see my hair.
Fucks that fit.
You look like a 15-year-old girl.
Wait, what?
What were you drinking? Looks like blood.
Yeah, it was. The blood of innocence.
Anyway, um...
Um, yeah.
This is all Chinese.
I'm wearing my Chinese fit and people really liked it.
Um, Lord blood.
Yeah, maybe.
Bro, you look like me and my bar miss as a teen.
Hold up Eugene that tall. I mean Eugene is pretty tall, but they were also rocking some
heels here. Was Calpaine cool? Yeah, Calpaine's the man by the way. We talked a lot. We talked
extensively. Is that a capybara on the Kaikamak on the bottom right? It's a pica that was
gifted to me. Did you meet any of these people? No, I did not. I did not meet Mindy Kaling.
I did not meet Priyanka Chopra. I really wanted to meet Eileen Gu, but unfortunately I could
not meet Eileen Gu. I didn't even know Halsey was there. Chrissy Teigen, nope. Crystal Kong
Minkoff, nope. Did not meet any of these people. Eileen Gu was the one person that I really
did want to meet and ask to have on the podcast or even the broadcast. And unfortunately,
I did not get to and I didn't get to meet Jethly either, also unfortunate, but he was
there. But I was just graced with this presence, this icon that was there. There was also a point
where I was being swarmed a lot at the after party where I was going to talk to the lady from
the pit, the one that just left. The pit, the show, the Indian woman,
who's dope, the actress, because she's like said a lot of very cool things about
Supriya Ganesh, yeah
Yeah, I was gonna I was gonna talk to her and be like hey, I really love what you know, I really love your advocacy
And I was excited to to talk to her but I was getting swarmed so I didn't I didn't want to be rude and just like I
Met you I was there. Yeah, there were a lot of Hassan Abi has there. I did talk to Bowen
and he opened, uh, I did talk to him and, um, yeah, that was cool too. Obviously be rude,
bro. You got a network. Yeah. I don't know how to do that. So it's tough. It's tough.
I'm really bad at that shit. Honestly. Was Hudson Williams there? No, I don't think so.
Every time you refuse to DM someone on a pod March, it takes a year off March's life,
I guess.
That's what you think is going on, you know, GG's the March.
Was Javier Bardem there?
No.
able to be rude to our Republicans. Jackie Chan wasn't there, but Jeremy Lin was there.
LeBron wasn't there, obviously, but Jeremy Lin was there. And I have a funny story about
that, but you'll have to check out the podcast to hear about that story. But yeah, we had
a lot. We had a lot of fun and you know it was a great time overall.
Chalpen is the goat. He was, we talked a lot, you know.
And that's it. That's my story. That's my gold gala story. I was very, I was honored
who have been invited, despite the fact that I'm not Asian.
I met the entire cast of the Avatar The Last Airbender show.
They're very funny.
I like them a lot.
They're very cool.
They were a fun hang.
But yeah, I have just won my first election in the UK.
I'm now in local government in London.
hell yeah Ebo calm Ebo cam Ebo. Yeah. You should have led with that. Yeah, they put me on
the, they put me in field London fucking L lad. Nice. Nice. Nice. Good luck chap. What
was I going to say? Oh, yeah. So the event was gold gala. It's like a celebration of
like a API in, in every field from the arts, movies, athletes, all the way to like big
business. And yeah, it's cool. It's cool. Cool event. Overall, did you wear the suit?
I didn't wear the Zhongshan suit. Were Ray or Nithya there? No, neither were there. There
There were a lot of like politics people though and a lot of conversations were had in this
group last night about Ray Huang and also Nithya Ramon and Spencer Pratt in general.
So Bro was talking to war criminals children.
Wait, what?
Who's the war criminals children?
What?
But yeah, you were popping on BBC Turk.
The Sampyger social media phenomenon who sparked controversy with his political commentary
in the USA, BBC News, Turkey.
The social media phenomenon that created a discussion with the political comments in the United States, Dila Yalcin,
Piker, in recent years, has been a tough word for the US inside and outside of the country in the social media broadcasts he made at home.
using strong language to criticize American foreign policy and American domestic policy from his Los Angeles home.
In 2016, he made an open statement that he was not a patavats, but an entertainer,
and that he was able to become a bigger audience by going to public broadcasts.
You're saying since 2016, I'm open, I'm, I'm somewhat rude, but also somewhat fun in my commentary with my, um, I guess open communication style.
I have grown my audience.
Anyway, I'm gonna, I'm not gonna see the rest of this.
I'm not gonna read the rest of it, but.
Wait, what?
Did you see New York Times like Gottheimer write an essay about how Dems are scared of
publicly condemning you according to him?
They're only privately worried about you.
I'm a Democrat.
My party has a double standard on anti-Semitism.
Josh Gottheimer, bro, are you for fucking real?
Bro, this guy is unbelievable.
What are you doing, man?
There is unprecedented crises in the world, and this motherfucker is writing an article
about how Democrats must condemn a fucking Twitch streamer who maintains the majority
position on Israel, okay?
The overwhelming majority position on Israel across the board in the party and also beyond
the party.
You talked about the YouTube channel close to the tip, why why why why why you are happy
What does the flagship channel mean on one side?
I didn't understand the channel of this business party
They say people don't trust anchors with ties anymore, and that's why they trust this on.
And then they immediately show, I guess, a photo of me in a tie.
Wow. Josh Gottheimer, unbelievable. Golden Capitrain incoming ladies and gentlemen, subscribe
to the Piker Broadcasting Service, the number one radicalizing function in independent media.
Support independent media, ladies and gentlemen, folks, boys, girls, MBs, the Piker Broadcasting
Service, the people's broadcast, the Piker Broadcasting Service, the people's broadcasting
service is sponsored by you, the people for you, the people. There's a Golden Capitrain
happening right now. You can also gift a sub to many others, or you can subscribe for free
with a Twitch Prime or for $6 a month with a regular subscription. A subscription will
allow you to send me links with no guarantees that I will click on them, or it will give
you the happiness that you know that you are subscribing to independent media.
Democrats privately disgusted by a sump I can, but are afraid to publicly criticize them
house them claims. Dude, that's so funny. They're privately disgusted. Let me tell you what
they're privately saying. Okay. I can tell you what they're privately saying. They're
privately saying, thank God there's someone out there who's fucking saying the things
that some of us are maybe a little afraid to say, or at least that's the, um, that's
the attitude I got from the many people I spoke to, uh, that, that weren't all like
Superstar celebrities or anything. They're just like regular folks as well.
I had $10 my bank of reserve never said I don't love you. Dude, that's crazy. You shouldn't do that.
If you have $10 remaining. Shani DeVito thinking of the five gifted Ian tattoos thinking of the five gifted as well.
God damn.
Here he's here. It missed you. I can't face a Monday without you on a Sunday. Yeah. If
you got the Sunday scaries, let me make it scarier for you. Dude, what's up with my fucking
haters, dude? This is literally like this is when random YouTube slop tubers would say
Hassan has a has like blackmail on the Twitch CEO or something. And then it like they're
They're doing, Josh Gottheimer is a literal fucking congressional representative in the
Democratic Party in New Jersey, okay?
And he's saying that like, Democrats are terrified of me, but they can't say it out loud, but
they all, they're disgusted by me.
What the fuck?
I know it's Mother's Day, but you didn't have to go live for me?
I went live for all the mothers on this beautiful day on this glorious day
What a fucking insane thing. I mean look, I'm honored. I'm honored to be just even mentioned really. Um, I
think you are
Perhaps you are creating an environment of fear for yourself not to
You know not to lower the temperature here, but you know
Well, Gottheimer, Israel first, dem claims, Dems are scared of me, but can't say it publicly
in the New York Times, Sunday, fun day, mom's day, get in now.
www.twitch.tv slash Hassanabi. Cogman 10. God damn, thank you for the 25. Get the subs
and extra rising with the five. Get the subs. Stop lying about fun day. I think they're
getting desperate and don't want you to collab with politicians. Yeah, I find it really fucking
I don't know why they think I got this level of motion
Some of the top some of the top comments I get when I go out in public is from from people who are you know famous
Ordner and ordinary folks alike is always like thank you for putting on the fucking good fight
The Democrats are literally not doing what but what meet that what needs to be done
I mean, this was like the the comments in general people checking in being like I hope you're okay
I know it's like fucking hectic. I know it's crazy
But then outside of that the the question I keep getting is like are you running? Are you gonna run?
I'm like no, I'm not I'm not interested in running for office
I'm not interested in running for office at all in any way shape or form. I don't know why
The media is presenting it as though I am for some fucking weird reason, but I'm not
the
Oh, but, um,
I just, oh, God, this fucking thing is so annoying.
You are more interested to run than to game? Okay, fair.
fair. But that doesn't mean that I'm interested in running. That just means that I'm never
gaming. You know, I'm not interested in gaming. That's all that means. I need you to understand.
They're calling you president of the blast off. I already, I already blasted off with
that. Okay, I already did. Here it is, ladies and gentlemen, let the people know we're
alive or freaking alive? Why should I believe what a politician says? Yeah, I'm not a politician,
so I agree.
Chat, does politicians get their lives destroyed? No, that's not the fear. My life has already been
severely under attack. My argument is about how much time, my argument is this, it always
revolves around how much time and how much effort I can place. In order to min max, I
find it, I find it much more beneficial to focus on what I'm doing so far and lend a
hand to candidacies that I think are good rather than spend all this time and energy
see an effort on like, you know, running in one singular race and not even guaranteeing
a victory, you know? It's just like it's crazy that people think that, you know, I have any
investment in running in general. I'm a mouthpiece, you know? I do agitated propaganda. This is
my role. I feel like it's much better for me to try to lend support to organizations
that are doing good work and to people who are
to people who are running that deserve that support.
Trump going back to bombing, Netanyahu just left abruptly a meeting with Trump.
Of course, the anti-camper, thank you for the five gifted.
And Duc D. Ducky, thank you for the five gifted as well.
Fennell thank you for the 10 gifted then you won you'd actually you'd actually have that terrible job
How you gonna shoot the fear and pockets from Washington? You are disappointing verifocus
Yeah, I know
All right, we're we're gonna get the situation monitoring
but first let's monitor the situation here in the United States of America, obviously,
which Josh Gottheimer, a congressperson from the state of New Jersey, the state that some
people attribute to my place of birth for some weirders, and I don't know this state
at all. Okay, weird, weird, but whatever. Um, is, uh, is, is written a piece in the New
York Times titled, I'm, I guess, the same, the New York Times on this beautiful Sunday.
I'm a Democrat. My party has a double standard on anti-Semitism. I haven't seen this. I just
I just got on, I was doing the podcast so I didn't even know that this existed.
Have you been asked for responses?
No, of course not.
And the New York Times not even letting me write a fucking op-ed on all this slander and
smears that I keep getting that I've been inundated with.
You know, you can write the same article about Islamophobia, Arab hate, I don't get the point
of this.
I mean, it's not even a double standard, it's a single standard on Islamophobia.
Everyone does it.
Everyone thinks it's awesome.
Okay.
That's it.
All right, let's take a look at what the fuck he has written.
I'm a Democrat.
My party is a double standard on anti-Semitism by Josh Gottheimer, New Jersey's fifth congressional
district.
In 2017, Democratic leaders denounced the white supremacist of Marshall Charlottesville
chanting, Jews will not replace in 2022, Democrats took Donald Trump's task for having
dinner with Nick Fuentes and anti-Semite and white supremacists.
Across the Democratic party's ideological spectrum, right wing hate is consistently
condemned, but today too many Democrats are noticeably and shamefully silent when anti-Semitism
comes from the far left at a moment when the anti defamation league is reporting a surge
of anti-semitic incidents in the past three years, a glaring double standard, considering
the response to really the embrace of a Sampai girl prominent left wing commentator with
millions of online followers.
You referred to orthodox use in bread and said, America deserve 911 both statements.
He halfheartedly walked back to the Hamas, a designated terrorist organization that's
killed Americans and taken America's hostages a thousand times better than Israel.
Israel has killed more Americans.
Israel has literally killed more Americans.
What the fuck are you talking about?
dumbass. Like, that's kind of the point. Anyway, um, that is the point. That's exactly the point. Um,
then Israel, America's ally, which you call a fascist settler colonial apartheid status,
they mean that he stands by. Uh, yes, of course I stand by saying Israel, America's ally is a
fascist settler colonial apartheid state because it's fucking true. Tackle the argument instead
of just like leaning into, tackle the argument and try to address it instead of leaning into
I can't believe he's saying this. Can you believe, can you guys believe he's saying these truthful things that I cannot actually address?
Yeah, it's true, bitch. Say something about it. A statement he stands by. None of this should be weighed away as mere edgy commentary.
Yeah, some of it is edgy commentary. Some of it is just objective truths, okay?
That are maybe too hard for you to hear. Like the fact that Israel is a settler colonial apartheid state.
That is literally just the truth, and it's not just my assessment. It's not only the assessment of Desmond Tutu and
and numerous other very important figures throughout history, but it's also the
assessment currently of Betselam and Israeli Human Rights Organization,
Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the United fucking Nations,
Damascus, the International Criminal Court, the International Court of Justice.
What are you talking about?
Sadly, we seem prominent Democrats appear on a show, and we campaign with them,
granting his views legitimacy. I've spoken to congressional colleagues who have
privately told me that many things biker said are disgusting yet they'll say
nothing about it in public even as they rightly rush to condemn president
trump for his unending barrage of offensive comments and so for me to
pose i understand that speaking up isn't easy if you do there are many on the
left who will heckle you in public control you online but whether we're
elected officials candidates or as an activist we should remember that our
constituents don't expect us to take the easy path it takes far more courage to
stand up to those who have long claimed to be in your corner than oppose your
political opponents here's the problem buddy okay this is a 90-10 issue in the
fucking party. It's a 90-10 issue in the fucking party. It was a major issue that caused the
Democrats to lose to an incompetent, tyrannical fascist like Donald Trump. Who is doing the
bidding of Israel? So I guess you're not as frustrated with Donald Trump as many of your
constituents are, okay? So yes, it's not people being afraid of getting heckled. It's people
being afraid of democracy, the democratic process, and facing their constituents.
You might be so invested in the goals of the state of Israeli foreign nation that you don't
care you'll stick your neck out and act as though you were engaging in an act of fucking bravery.
Okay, but the reality matter is your colleagues that are disgusted with my statements that are
too afraid to say anything about it are actually not afraid because my fans are all over the
country and they're gonna fucking heckle politicians, it's that people, their constituents, are
gonna hear what they have to say about a prominent critic of Israel and go, wait a minute, I
agree with this fucking prominent critic of Israel. Why are you attacking a prominent
critic of Israel? I'm a critic of Israel myself and I'm your fucking constituent. What they're
afraid of is not sticking their neck out and doing the right thing. What they're afraid
of is actually facing their constituents on an issue that they obviously do not align
on. How silly, how unbelievably silly. It takes far more courage to stand up to those
who have long claimed to be in your corner than to oppose your political opponents. That's
what principle leadership is all about, but we're not always seeing it. Yeah. The Democrats,
the Democrat politicians need to take a principled stance and say, fuck the voters. Fuck this
90, 10 issue. We are pro Israel. That's great, man. That's what they should be doing. Josh
Godheimer, you are such a fucking unbearable loser. Oh my God. At the recent party convention,
Michigan Democrats nominated a candidate to run for a seat in the university of Michigan's
border regions who shared a social media post praising the former leader of his bullet as a
martyr and another post that invoked. Yeah, that guy's awesome. By the way, you want to know why
he got fucking elected because as a lawyer, he stood against the previous fucking region
who not only was a freak. Okay. It turns out in Slack messages, we found out that he was writing
horrible things about students and how quote-unquote fuckable they are, okay?
But also on top of that, he very famously prosecuted
in a democratic state, he actively pushed to prosecute
peaceful college campus protesters that were protesting against the apartheid that was at the time doing a genocide.
That's the reason why that person is getting punished for two reasons, not just the slack messages,
but also because of the actions that he took in the interest of defending Israel's approval
ratings in the United States of America by trying to push for criminal prosecution against
peaceful protesters on an issue that is, once again, 90-10 in the Democratic base.
You cannot call yourself a Democratic party representative if you are this at odds with
your own base.
You might as well just fucking switch your party loyalty at that point.
Last month, Senate Democrats voted two measures that would have blocked the sales of military
equipment to Israel, some arguing that among the reasons their votes was their assessment
of Israel's human rights record, is this turnabout a legitimate departure of decades of American
foreign policy?
Or more likely, is it a politically convenient stance that coincides with a small but vocal
and growing sentiment?
It's not small.
It's not small.
This is not a small but vocal growing constituency.
It is the entirety of the constituency.
These guys are so actively trying to deny abject reality that is in front of them, and
the only way that they can get away with this is if they know the readership of the New
York Times is also just as fucking oblivious, which I'm willing to bet, and we will look
at the comments in a second.
They are probably flaming his ass, because even the liberal elite New York Times readership
has had enough with Israel and has had enough with Israel first politics, which Josh Gottheimer
is absolutely demonstrating. Let's look at the comments real quick.
How many times do people have to say it as many comments are done below?
Criticism of the government of Israel is not the same thing as anti-Semitism. We hear this over and
over. We should cut off military aid and weapons sales to Israel until Israel agrees to start removing
settlers from the West Bank. Complaining criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism is anti-Semitic to me
and American Jew. This allows people like the author, Israel's leaders, and many Republicans
use the term an issue of the Holocaust as a shield for current day atrocities.
Asan Piker is pointing out the truth, and sometimes he may say something insensitive,
but I have no doubt he would actually fight for my rights and not use me as a prop.
As many and others have said, criticizing the actions of the Israeli government is not a
kind of anti-Semitism. The decades of Israeli oppression of Arab and Palestinian people
is well documented. I would cut off all arms sales and funding to Israel and to other nations
that traffic an oppression. Hey, Josh, are you hearing? Are you hearing the constituents?
No, of course not. You're such a fucking bitch. These guys have so much disdain for democracy.
They have so much unbelievable disdain for democracy. Never did I ever think that we
would be in a place where the American population, not just the American population, but New
York Times subscribers would be taking the side of a fucking Twitch streamer when a democratic
Congress person went
Went about their day and wrote a goddamn op-ed. Okay. This is design
The readership is supposed to be designed in a way where like they will literally take Josh got Heimer's position
Over the position of a random fucking Twitch streamer that they could just easily discard
But they all understand exactly what's going on here and this is precisely what I was talking about when I said
These guys are attacking me because they think they can discipline people who speak out against Israel
They think they can actually silence people who are saying what the fuck are we doing?
This is embarrassing. This is humiliating do something about this Democrats fight back against this Democrats and yet and yet
These guys still do it not realizing that they're burning what remains of their mind like they're their minor
Credibility on any issue whatsoever. They're burning away what remains of their social capital and their political power
With the hopes that they can just discipline a fucking Twitch streamer. It's over
To the author of this piece I say that my father got out of Germany in 1930 and always warned us as a right-wing nativist
Authoritarians of any stripe are never good news for Jews 100%
Every political party is insane, so I some hit in some open. I don't particularly enjoy walking in
no-kins marching. I see a few people change from the river to the sea, but I'm a lot more afraid
of the white. And like this person still gets afraid when they hear from the river to the sea,
but he's like, but I kind of get where they're coming from as opposed to like the actual fucking
danger. Like this is the most charitable for Josh Gottheimer's perspective, right? And even then
They're like dude, what the fuck are you doing when you lose a person like this who sincerely is afraid of
From the River to the Seap house. I would be free who is
Understandably much more afraid of the true danger to Jews, which is the white nationalist
anti-semitism that is
unbelievably normalized on the right, okay, and
And an allegiance this unholy allegiance this undying allegiance to the fucking major state of Israel
That is actively saying we're doing this for the Jews, making Jews lives less safe.
Okay.
Huh.
What the fuck do you think?
Where the fuck are we on this issue?
Why are you still doing this?
Knowing full well that it's not working.
Why are you burning your social capital, the limited amount of social capital that remains?
Here are my brief comments, Ait Simpson must always be addressing confronted, disagreement
with Nanny Allen is government is anti, is not anti-Semitic, Tom Freeman in the New York
Times always write go read him, ew, ew, I'm going to acknowledge who has raised the
reforms you.
I haven't been in a synagogue since I was 16, but I did go through 10 years of religious
school and very proud of my ethnic heritage.
I identify as an ethnic Jew.
I'm an unreconstructed new left hippie in politics.
i'm hypersensitized as a model strongly opposed to current politics in the
israeli government
the base principle of recent is the assumption that all members of the
group of the same
when people equate the israeli number of all juzer from the basic principle of
race is thinking a significant
uh... portion of israel is really opposed to their government is doing
at lunch on some boys role pays on the whole cap to show juju anyone picked
up i learned the k word and why were the ones a kid
i don't care what side of the aisle people's politics confirm if they can
escape the idea all group members of the same
well good thing i don't do that
Mr. Gahimer got it fundamentally wrong. I'm not familiar with the Zonpeiker, but a Greer
disagree with the example cited. None of them are based on ethnicity, criticism, behavior,
most always feel loud. Yeah, even Josh Gahimer unironically does promotion for me in this
situation. If you look at the fucking comments, they're like, I don't even know who this
Zonfellow is, but he's very clearly shitting on Israel, the Israeli government and the
actions of the state of Israel. And you're over here trying to conflate that to the American
Jewry. That is unbelievably anti-Semitic. It makes Jews lives less safe.
Anyway, and then he literally, because he can't help himself, right? He's not just
saying Hassan's words are mean, he has to tie this to a sequence of unbelievably popular
bills like the Block the Bombs Act and how this is Democrats responding to this like
tiny group of people and also subtly but not so subtly being anti-semitic for doing so.
If this is now the standard for supporting military aid and arms sales and the Democratic
members of Congress should at least be consistent, do they believe we should block weapons sales
Saudi Arabia. Yes, you know who else did that, by the way? Bernard fucking Sanders, who also is
Jewish, mind you. You know who was in support of that? Me, me at the time. I was screaming,
fucking bloody murder, Egypt and Turkey. Sure, yes, given the history of human rights abuse
in other countries. Now, this of course, ironically, is a false conflation between the Egyptian state
and the Turkish state and Saudi Arabia, many of which have consistently engaged in atrocious
behavior and even war crimes, sometimes against civilians as a matter of fact, specifically
I'm talking about Turkey against the Kurds, for example, right?
Having said that, none of them reached the standard of fucking what Israel has done to
the Palestinians for 80 plus years.
It's ridiculous.
The closest analog to a man-made famine would be Saudi Arabia, which ironically enough was
exactly what Bernie Sanders was trying to stop.
So this what aboutism doesn't even fucking work.
The democratic condemnation piled on Israel's government is overwhelming in comparison to
other allies.
It's also louder than Democrats condemnation of Iran's regime.
Hey, guess what, dude, you know the actual condemnations here?
Those who are critics of Israel.
When Bernie Sanders comes out and says, we must stop weapons sales to Saudi Arabia, they're
doing a famine in Yemen, there aren't 700 fucking articles from the anti-Islamophobia
league or whatever the fuck, right? Uh, saying, well, Bernie Sanders, uh, Islamophobic much
for trying to stop Saudi Arabia's genocide in Yemen.
It's also louder than Democrats, condom, Iran's machine for the slaughter of 1000 Iranians. Oh
my God, buddy, do we fund the IRGC? What are you talking about? Do we fund the motherfucking IRGC?
But are we funding the Islamic Republic in any way, shape or form?
There is no apt comparison here.
There is no analog here because Israel is a unique country in its allegiance.
It's unique in many other respects as well.
a 21st century nation with, I'm sorry to say, 14th century principles. Okay? Like when it
comes to siege warfare, when it comes to ethnic cleansing, that is one of the issues. It's
using 21st century weapons oftentimes with paid for with our tax dollars. Okay? It has
a uniquely pervasive impact on American domestic politics and American foreign policy. There
There is no fucking comparison between Israel and any of our other allies.
There is no world where someone, there is no world, wait, hold on, Kapiachan.
Okay, sorry.
24th century BC.
Did I say 24th century?
a 21st century. Anyway, Israel has been decried by some leading Democrats on apartheid state,
but I haven't heard any of them claim apartheid when it comes to how women in LGBTQ treated
across the Middle East. Oh my God, this guy's running the maximum 2020, like 2021 route,
like oh well uh excuse me what about the apartheid for gays okay
it's so funny oh oh you don't like israel well guess what israel's gay okay well they're doing
a gay apartheid they're doing apartheid but also in a gay way who gives a fuck apartheid is still
apartheid mofuckers mofuckers hasn't updated the hasbra talking points since like 2017 who gives
the shit dude oh I didn't realize I'm sorry oh so I guess the apartheid is fine
then yeah oh no genocide is okay because gay people are doing the genocide
who gives a fuck what's wrong with you
ironic because the opposition only now in Israel only now is in favor of
fucking openly allowing gay marriage take place on Israeli soil but that's
besides the point we're not even gonna get into that that doesn't even fucking
matter, even if they were literally everyone was homosexual in the Israeli government that
still wouldn't make the apartheid justifiable and it still certainly wouldn't make genocide
justifiable. Okay.
One Democrat, a very likely presidential hopeful, recently argued that Israel can afford its
own security and that Israelis don't need America's financial aid. Even this is by the
way, a very likely presidential hopeful is Rahm Emanuel. Rahm Emanuel's parents or Rahm
Emanuel's father was in the, if I'm not mistaken, the Irgun militia. Okay. You're talking about
a guy who literally did terrorism to build the Israeli state and you're mad, you're mad
at fucking Rahm Emanuel, you've lost your damn mind, dude.
If you're finding yourself at odds with Rahm Emanuel claiming that he's too far out there
with the way he's talking about Israel, you've lost the damn plot.
Yeah, Rahman, who's daddy was in a Jewish terrorist organization.
Like literally, what the fuck are we talking about?
Anyway, what are we talking about, man?
You're fucking psycho.
Even though Israel has been a stalwart partner in America's fight against Hamas,
his bullet, yeah, America's fight against Hamas.
Why is America fighting Hamas?
What are you talking about? Why does Hamas exist? Say it with his below. Why does his bullet exist? Oh, that's right
It's because Israel exists. Okay, it's because Israel doesn't just exist as a normal country
but a country that actually dominates every other fucking neighboring country and
constantly foments ethnic tensions and is
actively trying to occupy every other fucking country in the region and
Dominating the lives of the indigenous population of Palestinians, which of course invites militant resistance
huh
America's fight against Hamas is so funny. Yeah, dude, we really need to fight Hamas
What a logical extension of that point of view mean that we should also pull our military installations out of well-resourced allies like Germany
Japan and Kuwait wait what I
Mean, I'm in favor of that too. I don't know what the fuck this guy's talking about
Democrats have just denounced the Trump administration for his broadsides in some cases stressed or some of America's close allies
But many increasingly accused
Yeah, don't throw me with a good time, Josh. As a matter of fact, I'm fairly
certain if you were to ask Americans, like, should we have 800 military bases
all around the world or should we have free health care? I don't think Americans
would say, oh no, let's continue the 800 military bases. They'd be like, no, let's
have health care, please.
Yeah, I hate all the Hamas I run into at the grocery store. Yeah, it's terrifying. Hamas
everywhere. Thank God.
But many increasingly accused of drawing feverish denunciations of Israel are law-standing
democratic issues to Galli when we're talking about which allies support which communities
we defend our principle shouldn't shift when mr. Trump blasts out of Pope Leo in ways that those
of Catholics rightly deeply find offensive many of us look the other way are you comparing the
president shitting on the fucking Pope to a twitch streamer shitting on Israel like worthy
criticism that Israel absolutely deserves Israel deserves far more than just my condemnations
and criticisms by the way that's insane you are an insane person okay you are out of your fucking
mind which is why they're cooking your ass in the comment section of the goddamn New York Times
opinion editorial page even though these are people that are supposed to be aligned with you
you're a fucking democratic representative oh my god behave have some fucking decency god damn you
are such a survival little piggy for the state of israel oh my god you're oinking you're fucking
oinking. Ay-ya-ya-y. These are exactly the types of hit pieces that I personally love.
Okay? Guys that are so horny to defend Israel that they can't even write like a comprehensive
piece that makes it seem like I'm a bad guy. They just give the game away three paragraphs deep
because they're so, like, primarily invested in defending little old Israel. My emotional
support apartheid state. Why can't they have a little bit of genocide?
That's it. That's the problem. They can't even stick to, like, basics to be like,
Hassan is dangerous and scary. Even then, most people will be like, why am I supposed
to care about this? You're a fucking congressperson. Fight against fascism that's happening in
the country, please. You fucking idiot. That's what Hassan is trying to do. You should do
that as well. But then, when you do these kinds of idiotic
comparison between the President of the United States of America shitting on the Catholic
Church, which is objectively insane, to a Twitch streamer with far less power, but also
a Twitch streamer that is making the correct point about Israel that many Americans now
actually agree with, you look like a fucking idiot. You look like a dumbass. This doesn't
end up hurting me, this actually is promotion for me. This ends up hurting you, okay?
We're also in a very unique media environment where controversial statements don't really
matter anymore. Donald Trump is the fucking president. You can't just be like, oh, this
guy's controversial. Everyone should stay away. No, people actually go, wait a minute,
what's controversial about it? Let me take a look. Or they go, who gives a fuck that
controversial, Trump is the fucking president.
I'm young, I'm hot. Anyway, when Trump laughs at the Pope, Leo, when a Republican
congressman tries to dehumanize Muslims, we should all speak up. When
Candace Owens and Thurk Russell use hateful rhetoric, they should be rebuked.
The same should go for Assam Piker. Everyone has a right to express his or
her views, however repugnant those views may be, but Democratic leaders have that same
right and a duty to challenge them.
I would love, I'm throwing down the gauntlet, I would love for any Democrat to challenge
me on my views of Israel.
I would love Josh Gottheimer to challenge me on my views of Israel.
I will anytime, anyplace Josh, I'm here for you, all my fucking God, I'll fly out, I'll
fly out to wherever the fuck you are, and I will have a long, uninterrupted, two hour
fucking debate with you on the issue of Israel.
oh my god oh oh make my fucking day you bitch okay make my god damn day go ahead let's have a
fucking conversation you can rebuke me not behind these fucking bullshit ass new york times op-ed
pieces where even the readership doesn't agree with you and dunk on you but i would love i would
fucking love yes i would not fly to tell abeve i'm not trying to fucking die okay i'm talking about
American soil with an American Congress person that seemingly is more invested in defending
Israel's feelings than doing right by their fucking constituents. This is at the heart
of the problem with the Democrats. This is why we despise these sorts of Democrats.
And this is precisely the reason why some of these Democrats are apparently disgusted.
Yeah, they're disgusted with democracy. They're disgusted with you. They have tremendous disdain
for theoretical democracy, for applying the principles of theoretical democracy to their job.
They are elected representatives. They are supposed to represent us.
They're not supposed to represent corporate interests.
They're not supposed to represent foreign countries.
They're supposed to represent Americans, okay?
That's it. And they are fucking terrified of that prospect.
And they're very worried that now there are people who are saying,
what the fuck are you doing? Go fight against Donald Trump.
Go fucking sever ties and hold this apartheid state accountable.
Why the fuck are they, why have, why has Israel taken 300 plus billion dollars of American money
to maintain an apartheid state, to dominate the lives of, of random fucking civilians,
innocent civilians, thousands of miles away, and then on top of that they demand more,
and on top of that if you call that relationship out, you get fucking endlessly criticized,
you get called a goddamn anti-Semite over and over again. You are told to shut the fuck up.
The demands are that you no longer have a way to generate income that you should actually lose your platform
How about you lose your fucking platform bitch in a just world you would literally be tried
Okay, you would be tried for defending fascism like this. That is what would happen in a just world
Holy shit
Insha'Allah one day, maybe.
There should be one response to those who express hatred towards any American condemnation.
Hate is hate.
It doesn't get a pass because it comes from your side of the aisle.
62 comments, everyone's cooking his ass.
Oh, no one.
This what about us and gets tiresome.
You can't criticize it unless you also condemn every other bad actor on earth.
So let's take it on its own terms.
We're not generic moral spectators rating every country on a human rights scorecard.
Israel's in a different category.
We don't just sell them weapons, we fund them.
Israel's the largest cumulative recipient of U.S. military aid since World War II, backed
by a standing memorandum of understanding, supplemental appropriations, and diplomatic
cover at the U.N.
Oh my God, that no other country including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey receives.
Criticism scales with complicity, and our complicity here is uniquely deep.
You can object to arms sales to Riyadh and still recognize that the U.S.-Israel relationship
is something much deeper.
The war in Gaza has gone well beyond any reasonable military objective as evidenced by Lloyd
Austin's own early criticism of Israel's tactics and into what looks too many observers like
ethnic cleansing.
Americans across the political spectrum are sickened by it and refuse to be complicit
on principle.
Change is coming precisely because no change is happening and the Israeli-led conduct of
this and other conflicts.
Framing Senators Vose's cynical, concessional, vocal segment dismisses the substance of what
they're actually responding to. And let's be clear, this is an anti-Semitism.
It's opposition to Israeli war policy. Those two aren't the same and conflating
them is deflection. Oh my god.
I'd like to point out that a rhetorical trick that as both a Jewish
person and someone who engages in debates on this topic quite frequently, I find
quite frustrating. Mr. Gottheimer frames this as a discussion of anti-Semitism
And then mostly talks about criticism of Israel this frames them as the same thing without having to say it explicitly when in reality
They are not doing so in my opinion gives cover for real and more overt anti-semitism to flourish because it cheapens the definition of anti-semitism
Simply criticism of Israel and not hate of and prejudice towards Jewish people
This is why I have maintained a principled stance regardless of how much people to my left sometimes and certainly everyone to my right
Who are anti-Israel yell at me where they say well, what do all so many Jews love Israel?
Why don't you just fucking why don't you just say it out loud?
Why don't you say it out loud because fundamentally it's not true, okay?
Fundamentally it's not true American Jews are American, okay?
They're American they live here some of them might be unbelievably sympathetic
To the the goals of the nation-state of Israel like Josh Gottheimer is okay, but that's a separate thing and
And perhaps there's even a financial imperative for Josh to maintain this level of loyalty to the nation's state of Israel and become this much of a willing servant of the state of Israel.
Do you understand?
It's not only unproductive, but also objectively untrue. People's positions can change. And also, no group of people are a fucking monolith.
Okay, American Jews are certainly not a monolith if they were if they had a monolithic understanding of Israel
Then pro-israeli organizations would have spent billions of fucking dollars on us. So trying to literally
Brainwash young American Jews from early on to maintain this undying loyalty to the state of Israel
Which still ends up failing if you look at the goddamn polling on this it clearly doesn't even fucking work
There is a generational divide amongst American Jews that are under the age of 50 versus American Jews that are over the age of 50 as well
Okay
Oh
At this point New York Times needs to let you do an op-ed New York Times is a policy of not letting
Anyone write an op-ed that's against another another person that has written an op-ed
Like, I can't directly call out Josh Gottheimer's op-ed piece by writing in the New York Times about it.
Not a single mentionous article about Israel's actions in the last two years' context.
No one is putting up with this. Look at this.
Bringing critical of holding the Israeli government accountable for its actions, not anti-Semitism.
It's a distinction and nuance that this author and so many others ignore.
One's negative feelings are worse for Netanyahu and his cabinet,
and no more anti-Semitism than are the same for Trump and his cabinet.
Exactly.
Like, when I talk about America, when I talk about what America has become,
has become or when I talk about American history like I'm not saying every single fucking American is a card-carrying fascist
Okay, and Americans understand that because we're Americans. Okay, we are experiencing it
We understand it, but when it comes to Israel, everyone's like whoa, whoa, whoa, that's the Jewish state. How dare you fucking ridiculous
It's a rhetorical trick that no longer works either
So it's unbelievably stupid that there are still those who maintain this stance
Thinking that this will somehow
Successfully cause people to change their perception. It's not working and yet you still see people trying it
It's very frustrating. It's very stupid, but I would say at this point
It's unbelievably unproductive for those who still actively write these kinds of things
because it doesn't accomplish the goals that they want to accomplish. It doesn't disparage
someone like myself. It ends up disparaging the author because everyone and their mothers can see
exactly what's going on. Okay? More and more people wake up to that reality every single fucking day.
day. You understand? I never, ever in a million years would have thought that a Democratic
congressperson from the state of New Jersey would write an op-ed in the New York Times
and the readership would unilaterally oppose or either overwhelmingly oppose the sentiment
that they are trying to get across there and actually end up defending someone like myself
for my criticisms of the state of fucking israel
there are lots of double standards in this world and josh gotheimer embodies
the one which is for years dominated american political discourse on the
middle east
namely shocking indifference of the life of any person including children who
isn't in israeli jewel
and with it
shocking indifference for the war crimes
Where the fuck did the article go? Here it is.
Shocking indifference to the war crimes and crimes against humanity carried out by Israel,
for which the US is uniquely culpable, as it both financed and enables those crimes.
There's a guy who's taken over $1 million from pro-Israel lobbyists in just the last
few years, and it was money well spent.
Even though Israel has been a stalwart partner in America's fight against Hamas, Hezbollah,
and other terrorist organizations, can the author explain to me exactly why exactly
we are fighting Hamas and Hezbollah while they're at it?
Perhaps they can explain why those organizations exist in the first place.
But the apartheid, look, even this guy, Ben from Munich says there are real problems
from Munich, okay, so you know, you know they're not of sound mind here, okay, they're German.
So real problems with anti-Semitism on the left in this country, and the apologies for
Hamas or the people who denounce Israel while completely ignoring the UAE, which has tons
of US investment and is actively supporting the murderers are as if in Sudan, which by
the way, we don't.
Okay.
And the fascist colonialist description of Israel is absurd.
It's not the Jewish people who survived the horrors of World War II needs our own state
supplies of the Rohingya and Myanmar and the Armenians and Azerbaijan, which country, which
country funded the ethnic cleansing of the Armenians? Hmm. Hmm. Oh, right. Yeah.
That was Israel, too. Which country also personally is participating in the ethnic
cleansing of Armenians that live in Palestine? Oh, that's right. That's Israel.
Anyway, this guy doesn't know enough, but it's fine. As it will go to China could show
us how vert is the promises of astronomy. If it was ethnic minorities, but the apartheid
is undeniably true. You got guys like this. You got guys like this saying apartheid part is undeniably true.
As a Jewish person with family in Israel, I don't think the criticism of Israel is necessarily anti-Semitic, though it unfortunately is often couched in those tropes.
That is the guy that is 100% supposed to be on board with Josh Gottheimer.
Okay.
And even that guy's like, nope, nope, you've, you've gone a bridge too far, Israel isn't
apartheid.
Yeah, look, look, this is what I mean when I say this, this criticism has stuck.
What is this in Germany?
say I don't know what this means.
The difference between Hamas and Hezbollah in Israel is that Israeli military kills hundreds
of innocent civilians for every one killed by Hamas and Hezbollah and does so with our
funding and our weaponry.
Thank you.
See?
See?
People get it.
This is why I think it's important to be brave sometimes, okay?
And to stand by your principles and not be afraid to ruffle some fucking feathers.
That is why I stood ten toes down over and over again on some of the things that I've
said that have caused tremendous ire and have caused people to yell at me and call me a
fucking terrorist.
The man might be platforming for years and years and years, okay?
Because it was the truth.
So in context, who are the real terrorists?
I don't expect the author of this article to engage with that.
I'm tired of reading these endless stream of slop claiming that Israel is somehow separate
entity vis-a-vis the United States. Anti-Semitism is wrong. The Holocaust, they happen. Killings
of 1200 is risen. October 7 was wrong. Those are facts. For decades, Israelis in the West
Bank have been attacking Palestinians there without cause. Like, you see this? Look at
this. Look at this. These are the people that Josh Godheimer thinks he can still reach.
And even they're like, no, no, we're done. We're done. There is a spectrum of different
levels of compassion and different levels of wanting to defend the state of Israel in
the New York Times op-ed commentary section, okay?
And yet all of them are universally saying, we oppose Israel's actions, and calling out
Israel's actions is not fucking anti-Semitism.
These are not card-carrying anti-imperialists, Marxist, Leninist, Maoist, Third Worldists.
These are not people who believe in the immortal science of Marxist, Leninist, and Jewish principles.
These are people who are American citizens who have believed the idea of Zionism, the
false ideology that Zionism has presented itself as.
These are people who have probably spent a long life believing that Israel is an unbelievably
reliable ally to the United States of America, who have said enough is enough.
That's it.
The author writes, even though Israel's been a stalwart partner in America's fight against
Hamas, his bull on other terrorist organizations, as far as I understand, America isn't fighting
against Hamas or has bullen any significant way, never really have.
As for the other terrorist organizations, Israel didn't help the U.S. fight against
Isar al-Qaeda. Yeah, ironically, you know who did? Iran. Okay. Again, gonna ruffle some feathers here.
Iran has been a more reliable partner in combating al-Qaeda and ISIS than Israel has. Okay? It's true.
It's objectively true. You will never hear it in mainstream media. No one will ever say it.
As a matter of fact, when someone in independent media, like myself, says things like this,
people are shocked to hear it. People think, how could you say such an insane thing? Because
they don't know. They don't know the truth. That's the real problem here. A lot of people
don't know the truth. A lot of people also have, you know, their own personal biases in this issue,
and it hurts their feelings to hear something so different than what they previously thought.
It wouldn't surprise me, oh here look, it wouldn't surprise me if Israel gave or gives
support to the same Sunni militias that the U.S. has been fighting all these years,
being that the Sunni groups in Syria, Iraq share a common enemy with Israel, Iran.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see much of a quid pro quo when it comes to the U.S.
sending all that gun money to Israel, yep.
The Democratic condonation piled on Israel's government is overwhelming in comparison to
our allies. Perhaps that's because other allies have not shelled up a part of the population
of a density population, half the size of the city of Toronto over two years. To have
the population of the West Bank under military occupation for 68 years allowed and then encouraged
building of 347 Israeli settlers to the West Bank, where over 500,000 settlers now live.
Tolerated at times, a bedded violent settler raised on Palestinian villages in the West Bank,
declared, i.e. present government that the Palestinians do not have a right to self-determination,
that Israel will never allow the existence of a Palestinian state. Maybe those are some of the
reasons why criticism of Israel is harsher than criticism of other allies of the United States.
People are glazing Walter's take. Oh yeah, this is awesome. Yeah, Walter, Walter did pop off.
He looks so much more comfortable without the suit. This is unbelievably comfy, actually.
This is like pajamas. I'm not even kidding. Like everything I'm wearing is super silky smooth.
Surely, Representative Josh Gottheimer, author of this fresh bold new take, would agree that
the Congressional Dem who took the most money from right-wing Nazi art collector, Harlan
Crowe, is a textbook example of this problem, with this light wrinkle that said, Dem is
Josh Gottheimer.
That's awesome.
Sadly, Representative Josh Gottheimer does not respond well to being asked about this
interesting contradiction.
I did not know that, by the way.
wing nazi art collector harlin crow oh my god that's so funny yeah that's awesome
bro thinks he's Indiana Jones yeah harlin crow yeah except he's not punching
the Nazis. Meet Harlan Crowe's favorite Democrats, Josh Gottheimer, Joe Manchin, Henry Quay are
Seth Moulton. Wow. Some of my faves. Okay. Some of my faves. Oh, Kyrsten Sinema, Jim Costa,
Jared golden Dean Phillips. Oh, that's Dean Phillips. That's not Seth Molton. Sorry. Fuck. Apologies. They're both, uh, on, they're both unbelievably forgettable.
Lisa Slawdkin, Abigail Spanberger. Wow.
Problem solvers caucus Democrats. Wow.
Huh.
some of my least favorite democrats in office
some of harling crow
the right wing uh... juicer
major donor to uh... and and bestie of
right wing
uh... reactionary supreme court just class thomas
harling crow
perhaps those of the other democrats that got himmer but himmer has talked to
okay? Who are repulsed by my statements on Israel? Well, I say your statements on Israel
are far more repulsive than mine. Last log comment worth it. The world misses
them all bomba of shut up i'm not watching that
anyway
Hold on, can I have shake? No.
I'm going to undo the repost and then quote retweet it with that image.
.
Hold on .heimer.
You can condemn my opinion on Israel in a public setting.
To my face, anytime, anyplace of your choosing.
I think the people will find your views to be, your views.
I think the people find your views on Israel to be far more morally repugnant than mine.
I think you're in statuance.
Guys, stop saying except Israeli.
He's not going to say, let's go to fucking Tel Aviv.
All right.
Hey, Josh Gauheimer, you can condemn my opinion on Israel in a public setting to my face.
Anytime any place, not Israel, if you're choosing, I think you're constituents.
your views on Israel to be far more morally repugnant than mine.
Send tweet.
Geopold called you out.
Oh no, I know, I already watched this.
It was so extreme.
I, I, dude, it's cause I called Geopold out and I caused them to make this long video.
No, I'm kidding.
It's a,
You have been to pull this off very well, Leneen.
Yeah, I know.
Here's a throwback.
When Representative Susan Wilde talked about making sure all faith leaders were invited
the October 7th vigils including Muslims which concerned wild, which concerned wild due to their
non-imitation of the vigil she attended, Godheimer responded with because they're Muslims and guilty,
because the Muslims are guilty. Yeah. I'm going to say we can talk about your double standard too.
Maybe in that setting we can discuss your repulsive double standards as well.
or repulsive islamophobic double standards as well is there anything happening? No, all
these guys are all talk man. I've begun to realize like many of them say they want to
have a conversation. What is this red pen critique of Western Marxism 40 minutes long
three weeks ago. This is this is what you want to spend watching on a Sunday. Have you
been seeing the Pearl Harbor discourse? Yes, I did. Um, he talked about at length and the
clip is on the same account. You fucking donkey. He talked about that as well. Stop getting
duped by small clips. Yeah, no, this person is not getting duped by small clips. This
person is actively trying to claim that I'm like in support of, of Imperial Japan. It's
It's ironically the very same person who has at times said, I'm far too sympathetic to
the party that leads the People's Republic of China.
I don't even think that we have to discuss this, okay?
The very same people that say, I'm too pro Mao Zedong, I'm too pro the PRC, I'm too sympathetic
to the Communist Party of China are the very same people that are now falsely claiming
that I would ever in a million years be in favor of Imperial Japan, because they're
fucking animals, okay?
They're assholes, they're animals, they're dumb as fuck, they're dumb as bricks, okay?
They hit every angle they possibly can.
On the one hand, they'll say, oh, Hasan, you are in support of the fucking People's Republic
China don't you understand they're like a fucking behemoth and terrifying and America's number one
America's number one op America's number one enemy shouldn't you be in favor of militant action
against China like good Americans are yeah it's the lady that said I remind her of her ex-husband
okay she's a fucking idiot
Yeah, Japan is the Hitler of the East is what I said, but these people are psychos.
And also, not very intelligent either, let's be real, like they're not even, they're not
even very good. You read the commas on the Yahoo News piece, they're all in your favor.
What Yahoo News piece? Yahoo News wrote an article as well, or is this the Fox News
aggregator? You don't speak out your wrong, you're complicit liberals and will eventually
destroy the damn party. No, these are fucking dumb donkeys. Yeah, I wonder why Fox News
This is loving Josh Gottheimer recently.
And we moved to something else.
We know you got haters, brother.
This is news in and of itself.
This is an American congressperson that's putting the interest of Israel first at a time when
there's like unprecedented crises born out of a fascist administration, a fascist Republican
administration and their undying loyalty to the nation-state of Israel.
You're over here being like, oh, this is not newsworthy.
Bitch, it's, it's the news.
What do you want me to fucking say?
Please watch this is about you and only three minutes long.
So observations about Hassan Piker might seem obvious,
but amidst a torrent of retread, red-scared bullshit,
sometimes the basics are useful.
There are two reasons that the Democratic Party elite
need you to focus on the pro-forceful resistance and pro-communist slices of Piker's twitch
rhetoric. They need you first to miss his core messaging around the desperate need for a socialist
transformation, and second, they need you to disown and project onto him the live-streamed
institutional and genocidal violence they are responsible for or complicit with in Gaza, Iran,
Lebanon, the southern border, the climate, you name it. Now, on that first reason, they need to
to discredit the fact that Piker has supported Bernie, Mamdani, Chris Rabb, Corey Bush, AOC,
Rashida Tlaib, Elon Omar, Ahmed Al-Sayed, and now Graham Plattener because these bad
Democrats are just starting to challenge capital.
But the fact that Piker supports them gives the lie to the second reason.
Because any real tanky, campus or Marxist-Leninist who rallies for revolutionary change views
progressive candidates as class enemies who capture and dissipate revolutionary energy
into useless electoralism.
So what does he say on stream?
Piker glorifies Mao without sufficient condemnation.
He yells at the chat that the blood of the capitalists should run in the streets.
This is very common resistance response to everyday social murder.
As a streamer, he's in the business of counter-propaganda, where the task is to de-radicalize
red-pilled men taught to scapegoat trans people.
Now maybe there are moments in the years of streams I haven't seen, I'm not going to
see that are disqualifying for me, because they cross into reckless incitement.
My sense so far is that he has a handle on this because he correctly identifies someone
like Luigi as an adventurist.
Now if he recklessly incites, he should be criticized, and he should definitely check
himself for any habit of casual bigotry and leave that lane for Joe Rogan.
So what's one clear measure of inciting violence?
It's the measure that Democrat elites always need to obscure when disciplining the left.
The measure of potential power.
Is there a left-wing crowd boys Piker marches with?
No.
organized armed leftist paramilitary he's dog whistling? No. Anything that could coalesce
to counter ICE? No. Any organized attacks in his name or citing his content? No. The power
piker has at this point is similar to that of anti-genocide activists in the streets. And what
does the democratic ruling class do to them? It says they have dangerous beliefs that will infect
the young with hypothetical terrorism, and it sends the cops to crack their heads. So they turn
the rhetoric of resistance, which is sometimes all a people has into hypothetical violence,
while they sign contracts with...
Well, I do so many Marxists hate you for dissipating revolutionary energy when you're educating way
more people. I think they have a different interpretation of the the current material
conditions that we exist under and where the masses are than I do. Maybe some of them are
and larping, maybe some of them sincerely have a disagreement on it. That's probably
what it is. They don't understand that we don't have a lot of prominence, especially
in some of these larger organs of propaganda,
mainstream media, and all these other outlets,
they don't realize that most Marxists don't disagree with you.
A lot of us are just here.
Yeah, I mean, there's also that element of it as well.
There's a lot of people who are in disagreement
with one another, right?
Marxists have historically never agreed with one another.
So that's normal. There's never been a period, there's never been a period where all
flanks of the left have coalesced with some exceptions. I would say like anti-fascism
is probably one of those exceptions where people just drop their petty disagreements
and they're, you know, minor ideological battles to join a popular front, oftentimes
to fight fascism. That's pretty much it. And the moment that the fascist threat is destroyed,
we get right back to fighting one another once again. Historically, there's never been
uh... a a complete
yeah i saw this uh... i think yeah i saw this
was some people don't realize by some package not some revolutionary someone
who does political media analysis whose project is the infiltrate influential
media circles of spread socialist and leftist ideals
which have been overalls overall successful so far it's undeniable the
sauce project is that massive region brought countless new left is in the
fold as well as converting liberals into socialist thinkers and even
reactionary right wing is on a huge scale hard for me not to see his impact
as an overall hard for me to see his impact as an overall net negative
it's ironic because like we're doing the same thing this guy's just bad at it
okay and they don't understand that they're bad at it so they just fucking
yell at me non-stop
and it's really funny because liberals will hear that word infiltration and
think oh he's being disingenuous
i'm pretty open about it
i have an argument and i think that argument is
is very understandable as long as you listen to it charitably
instead of immediately assuming the worst
which is why many liberals
do assume the worst and say, oh, this is like, um, this is a clear cut infiltration.
This is bad.
This is wrong.
We got to fucking do away with this guy.
We got to, we got to cut him from our ranks.
No, what you're trying to do is, uh, is, is stop people from hearing this alternative
perspective that they've never actually heard in a charitable manner because
you're worried that if they were equipped, if they were class conscious, if they
were aware of their class position and if they were equipped with political
education, that they might actually see themselves not as just like party loyalists, but instead
a different ideological tendency beyond the only one that was readily available to them
their entire lives, which is just like regular liberalism, whatever the fuck that means,
like blanket liberalism, which is monoculture to begin with.
It's liberalism on the right, it's liberalism on the left.
Palantir and write checks to the IDF and deny even the most diplomatic advocates for Palestine
the right to speak.
The age of critique of you is you're taking revolutionary discourse and mobilizing it towards
reformist theory of change you like better but not communist politicians. Dude, dude what do you mean
elect communist politicians? If you think that there is a capacity to elect communist politicians
right now and I'm simply standing ahead of it, you're delusional about what the average person
thinks about communism, let alone socialism, okay?
It's, it's so shocking. What Kami says, thank you for the 10 gift subs.
Anyway, I'm, I do think that it's, it's silly to constantly have to duke it out with my left
flank when I'm getting fucking yelled at non-stop by endlessly more powerful forces that actually
do have some long-standing impact in American political discourse.
We're talking about American senators and American representatives in both the Democratic
Party and the Republican Party.
We're talking about mainstream media that is actively calling me a threat to not only
just the Democratic Party's future, but also the future of this country.
you're over here telling me about like some fucking guy who works for the ACP or
something, uh,
yelling at me because I don't subscribe to a movement that,
that will lean into whatever the algorithm presents as a,
a, uh, as the,
the new thing to the focus on,
which is what the ACP did for fucking years,
leaning into Andrew Tate,
leaning into all of these like red pilled guys as though that was, uh,
That was the true way to to reach across the aisle to the fucking working class
Okay, it's ridiculous
They call me fucking Taylor's that is literally textbook Taylor's um that is literally what Lenin
extensively wrote about as a matter of fact
Lenin straight up wrote about Taylor's um
opportunism, when it came to reactionary anti-semitism, he straight up said, if we were
tailists, we would focus on one of the most prominent movements at the time, which was
anti-semitism, blaming Jews, instead of focusing on class contradictions, instead of focusing
on class-first politics.
He literally wrote it!
These people who routinely yell at me, calling me a fucking talus for the liberal Zionist
democratic project or whatever the fuck, are themselves engaging in the actual reactionary
talus mentality.
I would vote to approve arm sales for Israel in a future entanglement if you thought that
was necessary.
Again, we have a long-standing commitment to Israel having a qualitative military edge.
Oh, God.
I will continue to support that.
You would vote.
Change comes by voting.
Mao Zedong.
A lot of people genuinely think your money can go elsewhere as if the global force of
capital aren't the ones acting against you.
I assume you don't have an issue with the PSL?
No, I don't.
I mean, I don't.
I don't have an issue with the PSL.
These arguments about dissipating revolutionary fervor is really weird because they're trying to repeat the arguments of people like Lenin when they were an actual organized and popular left flank.
Those times were the times when even Natsuta put socialists in their name to be popular. There isn't a revolutionary fervor that you can dissipate. Exactly.
Exactly.
Where is the revolutionary fervor? People are just beginning to recognize, people are just
beginning to recognize their class position. They recognize the struggles but don't have the class
consciousness nor the political education to understand exactly why the pain that they're
feeling and the struggles that they're experiencing are happening to them. That is a very unique
environment. It can be a very dangerous environment. This is how you can have a shit ton of people,
a shit ton of people in the working class turn into lump and prowls reactionaries of all different
sorts. I think there are a lot of people who are very well read, perhaps a lot better read than I
am on Marx's theory. But when they were diving into the books, I think they forgot to look outside
a little bit and talk to their fellow man and develop a better understanding and appreciation
of where they're at and how to convince them. Okay, that's the issue. Unfortunately, many of
these people who are very well read on theory are not so good at communicating that in a way that is
palatable. They have this interesting understanding of the working class where they have almost
disdain for the working class. I don't know. I disagree that there's a revolutionary fervor
when you're organizing on material conditions and building tenant unions. People are on
militant because they have nothing else. The material conditions are bad enough, but if
we have organized on ideology, i.e. through elections, we're going to lose. Organizing
is teaching people collectively, engaging class struggle. Yes, cinemarxism. I know. I know.
You and I are not going to see eye to eye on, you know, building a robust movement.
I don't, I don't disparage what you do, of course.
I think it's unbelievably important, but you are in some ways, unfortunately, a little
bit of an anarchist, okay?
I say we can do both.
Winston's Cinemarksism? No, that's not true.
He's not an anarchist. Okay.
Well, he sure sounds like one in a lot of instances.
Organizing the working class anarchism? Yes, it can be. What do you think?
Wait, what? What, you think anarchists don't fucking organize the working
class? Of course they do. They're at the forefront.
They, especially in the United States of America, anarchists are the
forefront of labor movements. What the fuck do you think the Haymarket riots were?
Of course they are. They play an unbelievably and profoundly important role in building working-class movements.
They do a shit ton more real
practiced work and direct action and mutual aid than many self-described Marxist Leninists do.
Okay?
My anarchism slander is, you know, it stems from my ideological deviation on what must be done.
Having said that, I would never in a million years disparage the important work the anarchists do in the United States of America.
Also showering, I think it's very important to shower with regular frequency and basic hygiene sometimes is an unjustifiable hierarchy.
Okay, that's what it is. I have to throw a little bit of slander in there. Okay, I have to throw I have to toss in a little bit of slander in this conversation.
Just as funny the 5,000 time good one. Yeah, there's a fuck ton of anarchists in this community.
Obviously, there's a good reason for it, despite my endless slander.
Tosna, I'm citing it in form source. We just saw the reaction of the so-called president
of the United States, Iran's response. All right, let's get to, let's get to actually
what the flux going on in the United States of America. Actually, you know what? Let's
watch this funny video first and then we'll get to situation monitoring. Okay.
I don't take any corporate PAC money. I don't take any corporate PAC money. We need a candidate with name recognition. My grandpa? You single-issue voters, you're the problem.
I'm just gonna say I don't think you guys can go with the definition of Jack's what else can I do?
Do you want me to take my shirt off? I'll take my shirt off. I'll do it too. Like I'll literally do it right now
If you want me to is that is that what's gonna get you to vote for me? Like I'm young
Okay, this is just literally shots fired a jack slash bird Schlossberg
Straight the fuck up
You know stop
Well come through the next five to ten years of dem pauses. We got it all
What is genocide really metaphysics? Calls for investigations. One bad man theory. Netanyahu made
a one-off error. Israel went too far. How many dead Palestinians would have been just the right
amount? The art of gesturing towards outrage and liberal humanitarianism followed immediately
by deflection, justification for genocide, and ethno supremacist ideological mantras. Not the
best in my opinion. Not a word that I use. We don't know what happened there. There should be an
investigation. I do not believe that Israel's actions in the Middle East is a genocide. Look.
I'm not sure I'm qualified to define it, but what has happened to the Palestinian people I think
is going way too far. I think what the Netanyahu government has done in Israel cannot be classified
as within international norms. Benjamin Netanyahu's government has been pushing very aggressively
against the idea of a two-state solution. This is literally the most like disappointing aspect
of Tom Steyer. He would, I just don't understand why he, he just won't fucking breach that standard.
I don't get it. You're literally a billionaire dog. Your dad was a famous Nuremberg prosecutor.
You should know better. Okay. You should know better. And you are literally that guy. You are the guy
Who they can't do anything to you could just spend a billion dollars?
Defending your principled stance on this issue if you got fucking hit pieces if I can eat it on a fucking daily basis
You can too, okay?
Tom Steyer is the guy who has fuck you money. He has generational wealth, okay?
Just do the goddamn right thing and you will be reincarnated as a lotus flower Tom Steyer. Just say the fucking truth
You can afford it
You called it a genocide on Walter Masterson's pod I
Think so I think Walter literally said I heard you speak on this issue with a song and you said you were gonna think on it
Have you I don't know if he actually did
You should get another billionaire on your show who will not be disappointing to you there which who
The fuck going on in California dog brother, I don't think you understand okay, it is ass, okay
I don't know if it's the goddamn. I don't know if the goddamn weather
I don't know what the fuck it is a California politics like
New York and California have been the long-standing like blue enclaves that have propped up some
of the worst, most right-wing Democrats in this goddamn country. Not right-wing on every
issue, but like right-wing on issues, a lot of issues that matter, okay? Great disdain
for socialized healthcare. And on top of that, obviously horrible on the issue of Israel.
But very woke when it comes to, you know, trans issues, very woke when it comes to LGBTQ
related issues in general, let's be real, okay, if we're going to be, you know, if we're
going to be honest in our assessment here, they have always been strong, loyal advocates
for the strong and loyal advocates for LGBTQ rights and abortion rights and things of that
not discounting that at all, and unbelievably bad on the the issue of
health care and the issue of Israel and and all these other things like real
estate lobby, things of that nature. Okay? Tom Steyer is also unique on climate
change as well. This is his main issue, so he's actually been pretty good on
that too, as far as like billionaires goes. But New York has now fallen. New York has
fallen victim to, because of the good work of the Democratic Socialists of America in
New York, New York is now in the hands of socialists in many respects. Socialists dominate
New York politics. Thank God. Unfortunately, however, California has not fallen victim
to socialist politics. We have a lot of work to do in this state. Okay. A specter is haunting
New York City and New York State in general. The specter of socialism, the specter of Marxism.
However, that very same specter is non-existent in the state of California and my state and
certainly not in Los Angeles either. We will get there, but it will take time. We need
to focus on what it will take to save lives there and we've spent a lot of time fighting
over the meaning of a word. What's happened there is a human tragedy. Anytime you see
children dying, you should be horrified. I know I've been horrified.
My message to everyone is quit believing your phone. Quit believing social media. Quit believing
just one news network or one frame of mind. You have to investigate. You have to use critical
thinking skills, because you are being led down a path to believe something that either
is or is not true, depending on the side.
Socialists do not dominate New York politics, dog.
No.
Socialists, self-described socialists, self-identifying socialists are now officially a force to be
reckoned with in New York politics, and not just New York City politics, New York politics
in general.
This is just true, okay, as opposed to where things were when fucking Cuomo was the governor.
Are you kidding me?
It's not even a question.
Look at Buddy, look at California politics and then look at New York politics currently,
okay?
New York politics is begging to kiss Zoran's ring.
You got AOC, you got Zoran.
There are plenty of people that are self-identifying, socialists, socialists aligned, or at least
It's like Bernie Kratz all up and down New York now, especially in comparison to California
and Los Angeles.
Not.
Then on the ground and conducting an investigation, that there should be an investigation.
There has been enough evidence that the International Criminal Court, the International Court of
Justice should fully investigate allegations.
Well, I don't believe it's genocide.
I do believe some of what I've seen is excessive.
I don't support Netanyahu.
We have to make sure that there needs to be ways to support the survivors and to bring
in humanitarian aid and to help to rebuild what has been destroyed and to create a real
government for the people, for the Palestinian people.
I think the number of people who died in Gaza during the Israeli action was extreme.
I think Netanyahu.
Oh, I can't even listen to this shit.
This sucks.
Here.
Go.
Have you had time to educate yourself on the definition of genocide?
This is your definition moment.
You're not going to like it.
You do it, sir.
Oh my God.
You know what?
Okay, I'll shut up.
It wasn't a month ago.
It was a couple of months ago.
Before, we went into Iran.
And so now, I think it's extremely clear.
Netanyahu government, what they were doing before, they now have us doing. If there was
any uncertainty, there's no uncertainty now. All the ambiguity and you know it's complicated
and it's nuanced bullshit. It is now extraordinarily clear what is going on. Drove up our gas prices,
took money away from, that we could be spending on educating kids and taking care of people
from a healthcare or childcare standpoint and they want to do it more. And it's clear
that there is no human purpose behind this,
there is no strategic purpose behind this.
And so all the questions about what Trump is doing,
what Netanyahu is doing, what they're doing together,
what they're doing to us,
and whether they have a leg to stand on
is out the window, as far as I'm concerned.
Since you're...
No DJ has ever abated a beat drop this hard.
I just don't fucking get it, man. I don't get it. What do they got a fucking gun to your temple? What the hell is going on?
Can you enter the governor's raise yourself at this point? No, I can't. Okay, and I have no ambitions to do so regardless.
regardless
Man, I don't know the fucking first thing about governance. Okay. What are you talking about?
Jesus Christ, yeah, let's do a fucking writing candidacy this far this far into the process
As a guide to Revolver yeah
It's motherfucking doesn't know either. Yeah, but
He has enough free time as a fucking billionaire did you know work on doing good governance
And he has a pretty solid policy approach on key issues that I care about
All right, let's get to turning now to the warning Ron president the war in Iran
Is it happening? Is it not happening? Trump is being extra belligerent. Let's take a look.
So earlier today, Iran sent their proposal back to the United States of America. And
you know, Donald Trump had a conversation with Benjamin Netanyahu and in the aftermath
of the conversation with Benjamin Netanyahu, he had a lot of choice words. He also denied
that Benjamin Netanyahu was influencing him, but let's take a look.
President Trump still waiting to hear from Tehran on the administration's latest peace
proposal and U.S. Central Command says American forces have redirected 58 commercial vessels
and disabled four since April 13th as part of the U.S. blockade against Iran.
Let's bring in ABC News chief global affairs anchor Martha Radditz who will be hosting
this week later this morning.
Martha, good morning to you.
So what do we know right now about the latest U.S. peace outline and why Iran still hasn't
responded?
Well, we've just been waiting and waiting. We've heard from the administration as late as Friday,
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, we expect something from Iran by the end of the day.
That did not happen. We do not know why, but Iran seems in absolutely no hurry.
Now, this proposal basically says, let's stand down for 30 days. The U.S. won't block
the strait, and Iran won't lay mines or do anything else to inhibit ship traffic.
it. After that, during that 30 days, they are supposedly going to talk about some sort
of nuclear agreement, which would be a very, very short window to try to come to terms
on that. So we are just waiting with, we don't know why we're going to ask about that this
morning for sure.
Yeah, and so much at stake in just the coming days here. Also, the global turmoil is having
a major economic impact here at home, especially with soaring gas prices. You've been speaking
with voters in Pennsylvania, what are they saying about all of this?
Well, these are key districts, and I spoke to some people there, and everybody is seeing
this change. Everybody, they feel it when they go to the gas station and they worry about
what comes next, when this will end. But as for looking at President Trump, those die-hard
Trump supporters say this, they repeat the president's rhetoric, basically, saying this
is a small price to pay if you can stop any sort of nuclear bomb. But others are absolutely
outraged. Why did it start? What are we doing? How do we end it? And that is the big question
this morning, Whit. How do we end it? Exactly. And critical in this midterm election year.
Martha Raditz, as always, we appreciate it. Well, the fragile ceasefire tested again today.
Two Iranian drones targeted a ship off the coast of Qatar. One drone started a small fire
aboard the ship. Ashley Webster is live in Tel Aviv with the latest for us, Ashley.
Yes, good evening John. While those clashes in the straight of all moves continue to go
over on the daily basis, I can update you also that President Trump did speak by phone
to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. That has concluded but we don't have any details
but we do have- Hold on, we'll get Barak Ravita on the phone. Don't you worry. Don't you
worry, sweetie. We'll see what the conversation took place shortly, and that's right. Barak
Ravid is already here. First, let's start with what the Iranians said. An informed Iranian
source told Tasdom News that the Wall Street Journal's report on Tehran's counter-proposals
was factually inaccurate in key parts, particularly on nuclear material details. According to
the source, Iran's actual text demands an immediate end to the war on all fronts, including
Hamas, including Hezbollah, Lebanon, and the like, guarantees against future attacks on Iran,
full lifting of U.S. sanctions, including oil export olfak restrictions during a 30-day window,
and the naval blockade immediately after the initial agreement is signed,
release of Iran's frozen assets, Iran a manager of the Shredi Hormuz in exchange for U.S. commitments.
Iran has also rejected dismantling its nuclear facilities and offers a shorter
enrichment moratorium than the 20-year suspension Washington demanded.
Remember, there's three demands, there was five years, there was 20 years, and then Iran
said 15 years.
America wants 20, just so Trump can say, oh, I got a much longer commitment than the
JCPOA.
It's pure posturing at this point.
It's about who gets to, who is allowed to pull a victorious position.
all it is. Including Hamas out of your ass, they don't care about Gaza. No, I didn't pull it out of
my ass. I've talked extensively with numerous Iran analysts on this broadcast. And their understanding
is the entirety of the axis of resistance, because they see that as a separate front where Israel
Israel can maintain a militant posture against, not Iran directly, but the acts of resistance.
It literally factors even the Houthis into this equation.
They haven't gone deeper into these conversations.
And the reason why they're focusing on Lebanon is because Israel's using the Lebanon button
as a way to ruin all and any ceasefire negotiations that could take place.
But it's supposed to be across the board.
I don't know if they'll write out Hamas at the end of that bargain.
They could, but so far, talking out of your ass. Why are people saying fake news talking out of your ass?
Okay, what, what analyst have you guys talked to? I'm sure on your broadcast you have probably
extensively read the Iran information. You, I'm sure, also have consistent contact
and you know know people that are directly talking to Iranian leadership
like Skahilla Dropsite News and numerous others. So surely you have information
that I don't so maybe maybe you can explain it to me because you've probably
watched a lot of Professor John videos so you know better I suspect.
Yeah. What have you done so far? Like the couple AI Lego videos, read some Barak Ravid
reports from Axios. Is that what happened? Is that the active knowledge that you have
on the situation? Because, you know, a lot of my work is being done in broad daylight.
You can come in and learn a thing or two here when you actually watch the broadcast. When
I do interview people like Trina Parsi for example. This is a direct question that I
have presented to people that have actual figures within the Iranian government that
they communicate with. Have you guys done that? I like when people say you're pulling
this information out of your ass, but where is your information coming from? I'm not
a terrorist. Oh, it's terrorism. It's terrorism to do journalism. Well, you and Donald Trump
are in agreement there, buddy. It's terrorism when there's two parts to a conflict and the
other sovereign state has official lines of communication and journalists who reach out
to them to develop a better understanding of what their position is, as opposed to just
posturing like you know better from the American perspective.
It's terrorism to have sources.
We should punish those journalists, right?
Is that, is that the next thing you're going to say?
Yeah, dang.
Okay.
Well, at least you're smart enough to understand how stupid that position was.
Yeah.
Look how well this has played out so far for the Americans who refused to
actually understand the Iranian side.
I think your gas prices are reflective of what happens when we demonstrate this level of hubris,
this idea that like, oh no, the Israeli intelligence is enough for us to move on this issue.
You know, historic national humiliation, try international humiliation.
Anyway
If Ron also calls for an immediate end to the fighting in a gradual reopening of the Strait of Hormuz instead with US
Lifting is blockade with nuclear issues negotiator over the next 30 days
Of course while this is a perfectly understandable deal Benjamin and yahoo
Has a different opinion
Will Donald Trump recognize the Benjamin and yahoo and Trump's goals here are not
not in line with one another. I don't know, Nenyeh says it's time to end Israel's reliance
on U.S. foreign aid. That's never going to happen.
Iran can only negotiate over their uranium effectively while the Strait is closed, and
we get closer and closer every day to oil reserves, dwindling. 30 days of oil throughout
the Strait means they lose that. Why would Iran ever accept the negotiations
ceasefire that makes them lose leverage over the thing they need to negotiate. Yes. No,
you're absolutely right. Obviously, the Iranians are not super invested in like going back
and having potentially their power plants blown up by the American and Israeli air forces.
However, Iran does understand that they have a lot of leverage here. Time is on their side.
is on their side, their missile stockpiles are not diminished. So of course they're
going to hold firm. And like I've said, although I was confused as to whether or not Trump
would literally go to China, and I think the jury is still out on that. I mean, there's
four days remaining until the Beijing summit. It's shocking to even see whether or not Donald
Trump would go to Beijing, but if they go to Beijing, yes, Iran is going to be the main
point of contention. Will Beijing release Iran or concede on America's demands against
Iran in exchange for an easing of tensions in the Strait, not the Strait of Hormuz,
but with Taiwan, okay?
Will China be happy with a refusal to send larger weapons contracts to Taiwan in exchange
for getting Iran to the ceasefire negotiations without extracting maximalist concessions from
the American side. You got your shot at the title and you flubbed it. Iran is quick cooked,
bro. What? What are you saying? You live comfortably? I do. Do you live comfortably? I mean, I do.
Yeah, this is true
Do you live comfortably? I don't think so. Do you like paying a hundred dollars extra for a tank of gas?
Do you feel like it was necessary?
What has been accomplished in this process gas prices are higher inflation crisis imminent what has been accomplished
Do you think that's a valuable trade-off we kill a bunch of Iranian children
We blow a bunch of Iranian facilities in exchange for higher gas prices in the United States of America, in exchange for billions of dollars of radar equipment that's blown up in retaliation in the region, American bases leveled, American soldiers killed in the process.
also that what Israel can maintain its ambitious, greater Israel project without having any sort
of impediment, like a sovereign Iranian state that could potentially fight back against
that project.
Omegi went to, uh, what?
He's pushing that terrorist crap still, Hassan just banned me from chat, Hassan just banned
me from chat.
Fuck that bitch Poki, she for the streets, oh god, you're disgusting, nevermind.
will keep you banned. I don't even think you have any value being entertained like a fucking
toy in here. What a pathetic fucking loser this guy is. Holy shit. Sometimes I get angry.
But then I think like America is being humiliated by a middle power, a regional power like Iran
in broad daylight and these guys are too stupid to even recognize that
what a sad
sad pathetic state
of existence
anyway well uh... will cover the uh... chinese angle here but here's what
barack ravine barack
idea f eighty two hundred ravine
uh... said
president trump told me that he spoke prime minister britain in the house this
evening and discussed the iranian response of them however he emphasized
it was a brief part of the conversation. It was a very nice conversation. We had a good relationship.
But this is my business. Not anyone else's, he said, in reference to the negotiations with Iran.
Yeah, okay, totally. President Trump told me in a phone call that he does not like Iran's latest
response to the draft agreement to end the war. Their response is not worthy, he said.
What does it mean when Trump rushed to call his boss Netanyahu after rejecting the Iran
deal?
Yeah, or before rejecting the Iran deal.
Robert Kagan says that the U.S. has been checkmated into defeat in Iran.
Robert Kagan, oh my God, which has seemed obvious since at least early March, but he
sees the consequences as going far beyond the region, triggering a global arms race for
For naval powers, countries seek to devise their own ways to protect their shipping routes
since the U.S. maritime security umbrella is no longer effective.
The revelations of U.S. industrial capacity shortcomings vis-a-vis munitions may also
now tempt other countries to try their luck against the fraying unipolar order.
Look at that.
Israel is literally destroying American hegemony.
It has been a has played a pivotal role in forcing America's hand, goading them into
doing unbelievably stupid things, which by the way, of course, is certainly in the hands
of this current American administration, let's be real.
Some of these problems are longstanding issues like defense bloat is not, you know, Trump's
problem.
It's a, it's an issue born out of capitalism, something that I've described over and over
again.
tremendous defense contractor bloat in this country and that's precisely the
reason why while we have the most expensive military on the planet, more
than eight of our adversaries combined, eight of our closest adversaries combined,
and yet the products that we are able to deliver is not enough to overcome a
poor middle power like Iran, a poor regional power like Iran, engaging in
asymmetric warfare against the most powerful military on the planet.
This is a tremendous defeat for the United States of America.
It shows America as a paper tiger.
At least to those with eyes to see many Americans are deluded.
They are completely oblivious to what this means.
They don't understand that America is no longer.
You know, world police.
Yeah, but Robert Kagan is a fringe leftist lunatic.
Yeah.
He's a Marxist Leninist that Robert Kagan.
You hear Nenya wants to put an end on US foreign aid and I was like if you want to end it,
then why is Apex still a USA?
True.
Bro we know that we would lose going into this, it's not that we are a paper tiger we're
just not willing to commit 2 million troops which we would need to take over the country
but that would also be stupid.
We are just being led by the dumb and greedy.
Buddy if you're not willing to commit 2 million troops then you shouldn't commit the fighting.
kind of a battle whatsoever. You understand? Especially when diplomacy is very clearly
an option, especially with Iran. Diplomacy has worked in the past with Iran. If you have
any real long-standing goals of like chipping away at their nuclear ambitions, if you even
believe that they have nuclear arms ambitions at all, and aren't simply using uranium enrichment
as a point of leverage to draw America back to the negotiations table and to have some
kind of leverage in front of the United States of America in exchange for sanctions relief.
But none of that matters, because we here in the United States of America are losing
this fucking war, regardless.
Anyway, Iran State-backed News Agency, Arab News, details Iranian conditions for negotiations
with the U.S. following U.S. President Donald Trump's reaction, that called the response
totally unacceptable. The terms are just a reiteration of previous statements include,
but are not limited to, releasing frozen Iranian funds and assets, war reparations,
and Iranian sovereignty over the Shredda Hormuz.
The implication is also draft. Yes, America currently does not have the troop presence
to be able to successfully do a long-standing military occupation of a country that is four
times larger than Iraq, a country that has 93 million people in it, a country with the
topography of a fucking natural fortress, a country that has underground military bunkers,
underground missile silos, it's just not going to happen.
You don't want to watch American soldiers on the receiving end of those FPV drones,
Iran doesn't really utilize all that much, even though Hezbollah has just recently started utilizing.
It's not gonna be good for American confidence. It's only going to be worse.
Yes, I know I've read this article from Bloomberg, Bloomberg opinion.
China is quietly slashing oil imports and
rebalancing the oil markets. The reason why China is doing that is
Is two-fold and before people say what do you mean rebalancing the oil markets by
Slashing their imports. They can't even get any of their imports. The straight is locked down. Yes, but China is a massive fucking
Economic power they could just purchase all of the other
Spot traders and the readily available oil that's currently out at sea
They're not doing that and the reason why they're not doing that is because they understand that if they were to
destroy the Asian market. If they were to sit around and consistently out compete
and and and drop oil prices even further and Japan for example would not be able
to receive any of those additional barrels of oil that are out at sea
currently then Japan's economy would fucking crumble and now all of a sudden
there is no market for Chinese goods because the Chinese economy is hyper
reliant on being a manufacturing hub. Chinese economy is still very much
reliant on selling goods to other countries, not only the United States of America, but
also Japan, Thailand, and even the Philippines, all of these other countries that are hyper
reliant on the additional barrels of oil that are currently out at sea.
This is the reason why they've tapped into their strategic oil reserves rather than out
competing the other countries in the Asian markets for purchasing what is still oil that
readily available to purchase in the market. That's the reason why they're
doing it. I give you a summary of what they're doing. The shift may not have
only kept benchmark oil price but also trigger to collapse in physical
differentials. China is quietly slashing oil imports and invisible hand
that's rebalancing the market in the middle of the Hormuz closure. Yes, big
cuts in natural gas usage power and very likely the petrochemical industry plus a
huge reduction in imports of LNG.
China has increased its imports of Iranian oil, of course, while decreasing their imports
of other oil that's readily available out at sea currently.
Because that's just how oil trading works.
I didn't know this beforehand, but apparently there's always additional barrels that are
out at sea.
I've heard stories about how unbelievably corrupt this industry is where you will literally
have captains that just put additional barrels in their inventory and sell it directly.
There's all these different ways around what the physical commodity actually, what the
The hard number of the physical commodity that's readily available actually is.
Yeah my dad was a marine engineer and called these his bonuses.
So, let's get back to Donald Trump.
What's my favorite Zinflavor coffee?
Yes, it's coffee.
And breaking news tonight, being reported by the Wall Street Journal, citing people
familiar with the response from Iran to the U.S. proposal.
On April 7th, some of the highlights.
Iran is proposing an end to the fighting and a gradual reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
The U.S. must lift its blockade of Iranian ports, save the Iranians, nuclear issues to
be negotiated over the next 30 days, another stipulation.
Also Iran proposing to have some of its highly enriched uranium diluted, the rest transferred
to a third country, and also Iran willing to suspend enrichment of uranium, but for
a shorter period than the 20-year moratorium being proposed by the administration. And it
will be interesting to see what reaction we'll get to these points by the administration.
But earlier today, Iran's military said that if the U.S. was thinking about restarting
the war, they better think again. Take a listen.
As it includes like today as well, we warn the enemy that if they once again commit aggression
and once again fall into a miscalculation, just as they did in the past, and are now
in fact paying the price for those past mistakes and bearing the consequences.
Iran's president also sharing a short statement on social media saying in part, we will never
bow our heads before the enemy, and if talk of dialogue or negotiation arises, it does
not mean surrender or retreat.
And also warning any vessels from countries complying with US sanctions will face difficulties
crossing the strait.
And by the way, in the latest clash in that area, a bulk container ship was hit by an
unknown projectile northeast of Doha in Qatar, causing a small fire.
And let's not forget that the US is maintaining its blockade of the region.
Central command saying that some 61 commercial vessels have now been redirected.
of them have been disabled to ensure compliance and there you have it John the big news tonight
though is the reporting by the Wall Street Journal because they are outlining some of
the points that Iran has returned through Pakistani negotiators to the Trump administration
we now wait to see the response from the United States back to you all right Ashley Webster
Ashley thanks for more on the back and forth let's bring in State Department spokesperson
Tommy Piggas. Tommy, can you confirm or at least enhance?
Come on, bro. Tommy Piggas, you can't be looking like that, man.
Piggas?
Some of what Ashley Webster had to say about Iran's response to the U.S. plans?
Well, look, I'm not going to get ahead of the president of the United States,
but what I can do is reaffirm what has been very clear from the beginning here.
And that is that the Iranian regime cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.
That has been clear from the beginning of this administration, even before from President
Trump, who has made that very clear from the beginning.
Also fundamentally, I would point out that the decisive outcomes of Operation Epic Fury
have already made the United States safer, including the decimation of their military,
the decimation of their military, the decimation of their military in defense industrial capacity.
So we're seeing actions from President Trump to back up what he has said, of course, he
prefer quiet.
Piggas first diplomatic outcome has been clear from the beginning.
But okay, I thought his last name was Piggas.
It's even funnier that it's Piggit.
It feels like it feels like they merged bigot and pig.
It's an incredible word.
I'm going to start calling people Piggits.
You're not just a bigot.
You're a Piggit.
you're a pig and a bigot
quiet pig it
he's going to see his objective be fulfilled here that the arraignment
regime
can never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon
uh... that they are saying apparently that they want
ninety days to negotiate something about
the nuclear material they possess or their nuclear program it wouldn't seem
that the president would be in favor of something like that
will get a not going to preview with the president made a side
but i think it is important again to stress how clear the president has been
here
on its objectives he's been very clear from the beginning that the arraignian
regime cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon he's been very clear
about the issue of nuclear dust as is commonly called
one to see that uh... be being given to united states
the president from the beginning has said that the arraignian regime cannot
have a nuclear weapon his actions
have made the world safer
and i think the broader point of this year as well
is the fact that we're seeing operation economic theory
fact that the agreement regime is loose. Oh, dude, it's, it's maximum cope time all the time on Fox News.
This is, this is why they fucking cover me all day every day. Okay. Because honestly,
there's nothing, it's not looking good at all. If you were to engage in like real news coverage
about what's actually taking shape in the Strait of Hormuz. There's not a lot of news
coverage that's positive coming out of the Strait of Hormuz. So that's probably the
reason why they're engaging in all these distractions.
The hundreds of millions of dollars a day because of the actions of the State Department,
Treasury Department, Energy Secretary outlining them recently earlier today have taken to
deny the Iranian regime the revenue they need for their maligned activities.
chris ride is the energy secretary and he said his department is ready
uh... to handle the nuclear material that is
somewhere in iran listen
trump is post-inclusive margillivane argue for continued pressure on iran
on to social
bro i'm serious
it donald trump is the most compromise
dot all trump is the most pro-israel president we've ever had
he is the most compromise president on the issue of israel
It's actually unbelievable.
The only people that he promotes is, uh, you know, people like Mark Levin,
he straight up not only has Wittkoff and Kushner, uh, on the negotiations team,
but now he's brought in a direct FD guy on the negotiation team.
FDD, as you all know, at this point is a, an Israeli cut out.
It's a original name was called Emmett, uh, started in or founded in 2001 with
the express purpose of fighting.
Uh, with the express receivers, uh, of, you know, uh, making America more pro Israel,
right?
Has below claimed strike on iron dome battery in Lebanon, uh, Israel border has the last
military wing released footy Sunday claiming a strike on iron dome air defense platform
in his crew at the gel, uh, alarm site on the border carried across, uh, carried across
two separate attack maneuvers on May 7th.
Sheesh
The FPV these guys have learned how to fucking maneuver these FPV so fast actually crazy
It makes me feel like they got some Ukrainians on their side somehow, you know what I mean?
First FPV footage that was coming out of the Hezbollah side was like kind of dog shit
You could tell that they were shaky. They didn't know how to like fly this stuff around a couple weeks later
They're just lasering Israeli targets lasering Israeli troops who are
totally not used to this line of attack by the way. I mean it took the
Russians years to create comprehensive measures against drone strikes. Now they
know they have like drills. Sometimes you'll see like Russian special forces
in pickup trucks. As soon as they see a drone come, they get out of the car, they
separate, right? And they start shooting at the drone. Sometimes they're
successful in in in downing these drones the Israelis are not used to it at all
and it will take time for the Israelis to get used to the FPV drone fire
don't give the idea of any ideas oh my god buddy this is just you know modern
warfare that you can see on your timeline. If I can see it, I'm sure Israeli generals
who are 18 years old can also see it. You know, this is not like deep secrets. Why do
you think they have those fucking nets all over their vehicles in Ukraine? And all around
the all around the the streets that they cross here's Levin's statement that
repose it 11 minutes oh here's a lens to the Ukrainian army capture the first
version position of the history of the war with only air and drone land forces
yes I did they also used autonomous vehicles to they didn't even use a
single troop if I'm not mistaken
This also speaks to Hezbollah intelligence, the idea of targets presumed from Israeli
drones that they are also incapable of countering Hezbollah's published footage of multiple
FED strikes on the Iron Dome battery in its crew.
That's crazy.
Lots of security issues in Lebanon.
Yeah, IDF is only used to murdering children.
So it makes sense that they'd have a hard time fighting against a more competent paramilitary
force like Hezbollah.
And Hezbollah was, Hezbollah for many, many years, their military doctrine revolved around
ATGMs, okay?
And they got really good at it.
And that's the reason why whenever Israel rolls Merkava tanks into Lebanese territory,
you hear about Merkava tanks getting merked over and over again.
They are the best at ambush operations with ATGMs.
They studied it, they learned it, and very quickly they adapted to drone warfare as well.
Maybe some would say it took a long time for them to adapt to drone warfare.
The fact that they are now dishing out FPV drone footage that Hezbollah is utilizing
against Israeli troops, against Israeli Merkava tanks, against Israeli Iron Dome battery points,
Like, that's, it shows that they are highly adaptable
to modern combat conditions.
They're taking advantage of the readily available,
sometimes commercial drone products that they can use
in an effort to mount significant defensive counters
to Israeli incursion in Lebanese territory.
Hezbollah also uses that crazy Iranian-made
double ATGM launcher that's basically
at the same time? Yes. The reason why they have a double ATGM launcher is because of the trophy system that the Merkava tanks have, which can withstand at least one fire, one attack, but they can withstand two at the same time.
So, that's the reason why you see in Hamas footage, inside of Gaza, whenever they're
hitting Merkava tanks, unless they're just like directly dropping an IED, like a bathtub
made missile, or a bathtub made explosive ordinance directly inside of like an open lid
in a Merkava tank.
you'll see three different angles of attack on a Merkava tank, because those tanks have
a trophy system that can withstand at least one rocket, but can't usually defend against
two. So they'll hit it from three different angles, one to distract, and then the other
two to specifically hit two rockets on a Merkava tank at the same time.
Of course, Hezbollah is much better equipped than Hamas is, so they can get, or they used
to be able to get Iranian weapons by way of Syria.
And they have better systems.
This is funny.
Atlantic from Robert Kagan.
Pro-Israel people are now calling famous neocon Robert Kagan an Iranian agent.
the u.s. effectively checkmated in iran and this defeat will carry lasting
consequences unlike any america's endured before robert cagan argues
what a surprise an article in the atlantic paid for by the irgc
the esteemed irgc general robert fucking cagan
dude the atlanticists have dropped
the the pro uh... of war with iran messaging
the only
it seems to me
right now. This is a little bit inside baseball here for you guys. Okay. There are numerous
think tanks in Capitol Hill and they all want to wage war with Iran to varying degrees
for the last 47 years. Atlantic is obviously pro war with Iran as well or used to be not
any more. Okay, the Atlantic Council, with the exception of I would say like sometimes
with the Brookings Institute and certainly the Quincy Institute, most of the think tanks
in Washington DC that revolve around foreign policy have always been unbelievably pro-Israel
and also unbelievably in favor of waging war against Iran.
But since operation, epic pedophiles, fury, operation Epstein's fury started, they very
quickly realized that this wasn't going the way that they predicted it to go.
Okay?
So, the ones who are at least smart enough to maintain some semblance of credibility
turned around and said, this is an epic failure.
We got to pull out.
Okay?
Yeah, Operation Epic Fiasco.
With the exception of La Quincy Institute that has always been ideologically against
waging wars in general, many of these think tanks used to be pro-going-to-war with Iran.
Now, they're all fucking saying we have to pull out.
Is this Operation Epic Failure?
Please pull out.
What the fuck?
With one exception, the Foundation for Defending Democracy, okay?
The FDD, Benjamin Netanyahu's personal cum bucket, aside from Donald Trump and basically
the entirety of our political class.
The FDD is very specific, okay?
Its entire purpose is to merge Israeli foreign policy goals into American foreign policy,
okay?
And Donald Trump seemingly only listens to the FTD guys.
Every other think tank guy is literally going, please stop.
What are we doing?
You are ruining our fucking project of American hegemony.
We have maintained free trade in every waterway for basically the last, you know, 60, 70,
80 years, and you are ruining this project.
Yeah. CIP and Quincy are the only two think tanks that are like, you know,
anti-war. Okay.
And of course they don't get a lot of mileage in DC because of that position
because they're, you know,
they don't have the same level of funding that these other think tanks do because
these other think tanks are getting funded by Raytheon, Lockheed,
Martin, North or Grumman, Boeing and the like.
And there's not a lot of investment or interest in an anti-war foreign policy think tank
However people like Robert Kagan are literally they're their neocons like they have what they are
Robert Kagan was one of the godfathers of the neocon movement. Okay, you got Bill Crystal and Robert Kagan both saying what are we doing here?
What the fuck are we doing pull out pull out pull out this is a failure and now people now Zionists are saying Robert fucking Cagan
Who recently wrote
That perhaps 9-11 was because America fucked around and found out
Only a couple only a month ago, which was really funny to hear from Robert fucking Cagan
Um, is now saying what we've been saying for months what I've been saying for months, which is that it's over
It's over fucking pull out pull out. We're bleeding stop the bleeding. Please stop the fucking bleeding
We will if you keep going at the rate that we're going we will no longer be
In contention for a multi-power world, okay?
That's it
America has been ritualistically humiliated by a middle power, a regional power, that has an economy, the fraction
of the United States. An economy that has been completely dominated by the SWIFT system and the
sanctions by the United States of America without ever firing a single shot.
It's over. Trump, don't listen to those pussies. We got this, bro.
Yeah, I mean, if I'm an accelerationist, I'm eating good these days. Okay?
If I am an accelerationist, I'm eating good. I'm thinking, you know what? I'm a mouse third
worldist. And as a mouse third worldist, let's be real. What Donald Trump is doing is unbelievably
good for destroying American Empire. It's true. It's objectively true.
Donald Trump. Secret Maoist Third Worldist. JD Pondon.
I am permanent first world genocide.
We will never stop until the suburbs are screaming bloody murder.
Donald Trump who says, my war is not with the American ruling class.
My war is the American working class.
I will make the suburbs scream.
I will make the American working class scream.
Scream bloody murder for the crimes of the American working classes committed against
the people of the third world, the nations and the periphery.
exchange will work in the opposite direction. I, Donald Trump, will make sure of it. I, Donald
Trump, will eviscerate the labor aristocracy. The imperial core has dominated the world through
unequal exchange, through parasitic capital, and the forces that are serviled to the interests
of parasitic capital like the IMF and the World Bank. We will turn around and we will awaken
the revolutionary Third Worldist principles. Okay?
May Allah awaken the people and help them to see the evil doings of Israel and the United States.
What the fuck are these emotes, man?
I'm sorry, we have we've lost the fucking plot dude come on
He's so online he might even see this okay, that's so funny
Zoom out
Marandi is the only Taurus I like that's funny
How much PBS you think you watch every day bro?
Professor Marandi if you're watching you better subscribe and also give subs. Okay, that's bullshit
No more no more free loading. Okay
Okay. Subscribe to the Piker Broadcasting Service, the People's Broadcasting Service.
Yeah, Donald Trump said we must proceed with JUSHA, the ideology that revolves around self-reliance.
Anyway, Trump is trapped in escalation and maximalism with Iran as long as this is the case. He can't make a deal.
mindset for compromises, real diplomacy requires his legacy will ultimately be another failed
US-Middle East war built on hubris and lies. It's from Sina Tusi, the other think tank
that was talking about, Center for International Policy, Center for International Policy, and
then Trita Parsi is the EVP of Quincy Institute. Those are the two main anti-war think tanks,
get only motion in places like here, democracy now, independent media in general, and virtually
no mainstream media promotion at all.
Okay?
They're objectively closer to the correct side on American foreign policy, and yet they
get very little airtime on ABC, CBS, CNN, and all these other outlets.
They have recently gotten more airtime on these outlets because even the American owner
class is starting to recognize that this much instability perhaps is not good for American
profit seekers, right?
Hello.
Hello.
Hello.
Marat was staying in my house last night, and I had a little freak out
Because I couldn't find I
I came back home late and I couldn't find kaya and I was very scared
I thought she was like you like was lost or something
And everyone was sleeping. So I was just like texting people. I didn't like look in the other rooms in the house
I don't have like a necessarily large house, but
But I should have probably looked in the other other rooms, but I woke up in the morning in a panic state
because I had thought that my mom had taken Kaya and
They were all like no and then I called them at 6 a.m
And I was like no she's in the bed with me
with me you want to go outside you want to hang out with the family is that
what you want to do oh look at this big lady hold on let me get a little let me
little couple pets in here. Um
you didn't do Mother's Day
stuff. Yeah, I'm doing dinner
with the whole family. Uh
they're prepping it right now
actually. Let the baby out. Let
the baby out. Okay, I'm gonna
let the baby out. Oh, she
likes it. She loves when I
scratch her back like this.
Oh, oh, yeah.
I'm a little bit of a mom myself. I was in preg with Kaya. It's right. You could have
use a shock a shock I locate kaya yeah that's true who's to say I didn't
anyway happy Mother's Day to me and to all the mothers
My 11 gallons in Costco this morning minus one AAA video game for this month until the
war ends.
Nice.
But don't you think that it's for a good purpose, a higher purpose, one that is perhaps
the most important purpose, which is advancing Israel's goals in the region, allowing Israel
to continue the greater Israeli project unimpeded.
Who amongst us has not heard Mike Huckabee's words and thought to themselves, well this
guy's making a lot of sense.
A lot of fucking good ideas from Mike Huckabee.
I am in agreement.
I myself am one of those people of course, I would never, I would never say such anti-Semitic
things as we must make, we must reign in Israel, we must hold Israel accountable for its war
crimes, we must do an arms embargo and these are very anti-Semitic thoughts, you should
get them out of your head.
Boy, I live in Luxembourg and it's so close to have completely free public transport nationwide.
Stop flexing. Stop fucking flexing. I don't want to hear from you, Royds here, okay?
You're about to have an imminent jet fuel crisis soon in any case.
Americans, we don't know what public transit is. Us Americans have never understood the
concept of public transit. We all have gas guzzling behemoths that we all drive 40 miles
both ways, at least minimum every fucking day. Ford F450s and we like paying extra for our gas
because it's patriotic. Calling Luxembourg a nation is fucking pushing it. City, state,
as motherfuckers true.
The bigger the monstrosity, the bigger the behemoth, the freer the person. Everybody
knows this.
Begging Iran demanded war reparations and removal of sanctions, unfreezing of assets
and control over the street of Hormuz as part of his rejection of the U.S. Proposal
Accord and Estate Media. Totally reasonable and just demands from the Iranian side, of
course, but classic American engineering here, uh, it dictates that we can't, uh, concede
in any way, shape or form, even though they hold the fucking cards here.
Uh, the Iranian counter proposal is publicly rejected by Trump, but if
Washington Journal reporting is correct, Tehran is trying to move closer to
US demands, but not fully the US demands that the entire Iranian stock probably
shipped out of the country in the past.
Tehran rejected shipping any of it out and only agreed to downblending it in
its latest proposal have already offers to have some of it diluted and the rest
ship to a third country. The third country, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
Just kidding, probably not, but that would be very funny if they were like, yeah, sure,
we'll ship it to a third country, the DPRK. As I understand it, though, this is not reported
by the Wall Street Journal. Iran is also offering to accept an arrangement in which it will
not need to enrich uranium at all for 12 years. This is not a 15 to 20 years Trump originally
But longer than three to five years Tehran originally offered read the full analysis on my social stack
Yeah, 12 is so funny they were Iran was like
Trump was like we won't do 20 will do 15 Tehran was like we'll do five and now they've arrived at 12
They're gonna end at 10, you know
China China ship it to China true
Art of the deal, baby. Art of the fucking deal. Art of the deal.
So JCPOA, no, it's not JCPOA. The deal, the terms on the Iranian side, no matter what,
will be infinitely more favorable to Iran than the JCPOA. And the reason is because
Iran now has more leverage than it did before America attacked Iran. So if they maintain
some symbols of control, a toll system or the state of hormones, for example, that's unbelievably
favorable, far better than JCPOA. They are trying to get all of the sanctions removed, again,
including the American ones, which is better than the JCPOA, but also more favorable to Trump,
because Trump is a businessman. He likes doing business deals. This means you can do a fucking
Trump Tower in Tehran, right? Like, that's better than the JCPOA, okay? Unfreezing all
of the Iranian assets far better than the JCPOA. The JCPOA, I'm frozen like, what, $1.5 billion
in assets is a huge deal. We're talking how many billions? I think they have like,
America was previously saying that they were just to show good faith that we're going to
to unfreeze $20 billion in assets. That's a much larger number. The total number, I believe,
is to the tune of $100 billion. If I'm not mistaken, you guys can correct me on that,
but that's a huge number. I believe the total global assets of Iran that are frozen currently
after they did some deals with other countries that America decided to intercept are approximately
$100 billion if they can get $100 billion. It's incredibly favorable to Iran.
Once again, I think these are all good, just understandable commitments that will create
long-standing peace. And I am, of course, in favor of them. I'm in favor of all of these conditions.
I think that is the correct thing to do, okay? Dealing with Iran as a sovereign state through diplomacy
Diplomacy is an infinitely better proposal than trying to wage military war against the nation's state of Iran and trying to destroy Iran
So yes
Let's send them palates a cash, baby, I'm totally in favor. Let's do it
The nuclear expertise in the United States is within my department. Why don't you know the number?
Aren't you the numbers guy? Petra bet David. I'm a numbers guy. I'm a numbers guy
Game of Throne. I'm watching Game of Throne and I see Joffrey and I think to myself this guy if I see him in public
I'm saying oh Joffrey we are fighting
I'm a numbers guy. That's why I say let's grok it. Why not grok it?
Why not ched you ched you be tea it?
I'm a no I'm a numbers I'm a numbers guy
They are ready, they've been monitoring what's happening in Iran, and they've been involved
in the dialogues about how would we handle this material, where would we take it, what
would we do with it?
But that is a critical thing.
Iran has nearly a thousand pounds of uranium enriched to 60%.
So close to weapons grade, way higher than any potential commercial use of it.
So a country that has, you know, more oil than just about anybody else in the world,
the president says doesn't really need nuclear material at this point.
Well, two points here.
First, as we've seen in an Iranian regime that for too long has not spent their vast
wealth on energy infrastructure, on food for their people, on water for their people, and
instead has used it on malign activities, a nuclear weapons program, funding their terrorist
proxies around the region.
These are all things that are being addressed by President Trump's maximum pressure policy
to deny them the funds to do those malign activities.
I think what's also important to point out here is the overall context of the fact that
we have diplomacy from the beginning of this administration.
We saw Operation Midnight Hammer.
Diplomacy was opened yet again.
We saw the decisive outcomes of Operation Epic Fury.
President Trump means what he says.
He means what he says when the Iranian regime cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.
Okay.
So the president has said that for all intents and purposes, Epic Fury is over.
the hostilities have ended, therefore he doesn't need an authorization for the use of military
force from Congress, but it doesn't seem like the Iranians are moving.
Is there going to be the likelihood of new attacks?
What happens?
Does he call it a new war?
Well, two points here.
First, as the Secretary of State has described, the activity we have seen recently has been
defensive on the part of the United States.
Of course, if we see our equities, if we see U.S. military service members, our ships come
under attack, we're going to stop that.
We're going to prevent that.
That's defensive action on part of the United States.
Of course, we're going to defend and stop any attacks on U.S. military ships.
That's common sense.
We're going to keep doing that as the Secretary of State has described.
What we're seeing now, though, from Operation Epic Fury is, when this operation started,
the President outlined clear objectives.
I discussed a few of those a few moments ago.
The destruction of their Navy, the decimation of their air force, their missile capacity,
a defense industrial base.
We have seen those objectives be fulfilled.
So now we're seeing this blockade of Iranian ports.
We're seeing Operation Economic Fury.
We're seeing the denial of hundreds of millions of dollars to the Iranian regime.
But fundamentally it comes back to this point.
President wants to see a deal here, but he will see his objective be fulfilled that the
Iranian regime cannot have a nuclear weapon.
The president means what he says and he has proven it again and again.
As you and I have been talking, Tommy, the president just posted this on TruthSocial.
He writes,
I just read the response from Iran's so-called representatives.
I don't like it.
Totally unacceptable.
Thank you for your attention to this matter, President Donald J. Trump.
So I guess it's back to the drawing board.
We'll see what the president decides to do from here.
Any predictions, Tommy?
Well, I'm not going to be in the prediction business.
I think the president's stating it very clearly there.
Again, distress.
Our objectives here have been very clear from the beginning.
There is no guessing what the president wants here.
What is the Iranian regime cannot have a nuclear weapon?
And I think another important point is we saw under the Obama administration a bad deal
that gave the Iranian regime a roadmap to a nuclear weapon.
President Trump is going to make a good deal for the American people that protects the
United States, the world, and future generations.
Tommy Pigott from the State Department.
We appreciate your time today.
Thanks, Tommy.
Thanks.
Thanks for having me on.
Be sure to like and subscribe for all the Fox News latest on YouTube and catch full
show streaming now on Fox one. Is the war with Iran over? And if it isn't, who will
decide? Uh huh. Quiet picket. Um, okay. So Barry Weiss is, uh, you know, pro is
barely operation CBS news, specifically 60 minutes has decided to offer 60 minutes
to, uh, neo-Nazi, uh, neo-Nazi, Benjamin, and Yahoo, Benjamin, Satan, Yahoo. It wasn't
enough. We didn't really get to hear from him, uh, uh, enough. It's not enough that
he just fucking, uh, basically dominates American foreign policy.
You already see this article. I got the intercept from the, oh yeah, Hasan Park is the Democrats
new man on the trail, whether they like it or not. Uh, I haven't, uh, read it on stream,
that I promoted on Instagram.
What is this?
North Korea has changed its constitution
to mandate an automatic nuclear strike
if Kim Jong-un is killed or incapacitated
by a foreign attack under the revised law.
If command over North Korea's nuclear forces
threatened the military most launch
of a totalitarian nuclear strike immediately,
that's my goat right there, dude.
That's my motherfucking goat dude. That's my that's the real president. Okay
Yeah, let's run let's run one at least let's run one jusha edit
Okay let's run another one.
What the fuck is this?
I wonder how you arrive at this level of brain rot.
I genuinely want to understand.
Oh, this is the best one. I know exactly which one this is.
fall forward so much, but I'm thinking of the way you are, said I'm fine, said I move on,
I'm only here testing time in your arms, holding on.
Yeah, just straight up ripping lung darts while watching a fucking, while watching a test
launch of a nuke all glory to the dpr k man what a fucking what a time to be alive
why are you screwing up my vaude fuck you was on what do you mean you're vaude what are you
talking about. We should have known! We should have known! We love you, Kim. Check this one out.
God, how do people, how do people arrive at like this level of fandom for, it's just,
it's very interesting.
It's just like unbelievable levels of brain rot.
Like there are those, there are those who obviously love Deng Xiaoping, okay?
There are those who are abiding by Xi Jinping thought.
There are those who love Mao.
But it's objectively strange to be like Zhang Zemin is my guy.
Like that's the guy I chose out of all of the different, all of the different formations
of, or all of the different instances of Chinese development. Very interesting, not to say that
he's irrelevant. Of course, like every, Joe and Lai was the goat. It's called love, you wouldn't get it.
it. I'm actually a limbo head. Oh, excuse me. We don't talk about that around these parts.
Okay. We don't talk about we don't talk about Limbao like that. I'm a fucking Joe and Laughey
and lia and lie guy and lies fucking basic
why would they even have fans when they can't even dunk i think mal could have dunked
if he if he tried he just never did but he could
i guess it's not as strange as being like a like a guzzalo thought guy you know what i mean
There's different strokes for different folks. This one has 52,000 likes, by the way.
Peru mentioned? Okay. Yeah, but at what cost?
Anyway, we're done. We're done looking at these guys farming aura. Okay. Where the fuck were
we? Oh, yeah. Let's get back to the real president. Unfortunately, boo. Boo. Now that
we, now that we looked at, uh, you know, communist, uh, communist leadership aura edits, let's
Let's get back to the great American capitalist reactionary pedophilic satanic cabal rulership
that we exist under.
Let's get back to reality, the petro-capitalist pedophile class that dominates every facet
of our existence.
Here we are.
Side, when it is.
I think it accomplished a great deal, but it's not over, because there's still nuclear material
enriched uranium that has to be taken out of Iran, there's still enrichment sites that
have to be dismantled, there's still proxies that Iran supports, there are ballistic missiles
that they still want to produce, now we've degraded a lot of it, but all of that is still
there, and there's work to be done.
How do you envision the highly enriched uranium will be removed from Iran?
You go in and you take it out.
With what?
Special forces from Israel, special forces from the United States?
Well, I'm not going to talk about military means, but what President Trump has said to
me, I want to go in there.
And I think it can.
Oh, oh.
Yeah, not what I told President Trump.
You know, in the brief moment that he stopped sucking, looked up at me and said, uh, you're
the real king, you're the real president, uh, Benjamin Netanyahu.
Okay.
Uh, when he, when he stopped sucking for a brief moment, he said, uh, yes, sir, I will
go in personally.
He done physically.
That's not the problem.
Uh, if you have an agreement and you go in and you take it out, why not?
That's the best way.
What if there isn't an agreement?
to be taken out by force?
Well, you're going to ask me these questions.
I'm going to dodge them because I'm not
going to talk about our military possibilities, plans,
or anything of the kind.
And I'm just trying to get at how long is it going to take
to achieve that aim?
I'm not going to give a timetable to it,
but I'm going to say that's a terrifically important mission.
Do you believe it's time?
He haven't had the evil guy comb over yet.
No, I think it's a flex.
like he, I think he's assumed a Hitler haircut just to make all of us crazy. Okay. I'm not
even kidding. I think it's a flex. It's like, what are you going to say about it? Go ahead.
Go ahead. Disrespect the real American president, Benjamin Netanyahu, Philadelphia's very own
Benjamin Netanyahu. Go ahead. I'll get you fired from your job. Go ahead. Point out the fact that
that I have the same haircut as Adolf Hitler.
State of Israel to reexamine and put.
Yeah, we'll know when the transformation is complete,
when he just like randomly shows up
with the Hitler mustache as well.
If he takes it to that level,
you'll know he's just flexing on us.
Possibly reset its financial relationship
to the United States,
meaning what the United States provides to Israel
on an annual basis.
Absolutely, and I've said this to President Trump.
I've said it to our own people.
Their jaws drop, but I said look
What do you mean? What do you say? I want to draw down to zero
the American financial support the financial component of the military cooperation that we have
Because we receive we receive three point eight billion dollars a year. Yeah. Yeah, the next member of an understanding zero dollars, okay
That's great. How about a fucking arms embargo? How about some goddamn accountability?
vulnerability. Do we like that? I'm in favor. Okay. This whole like, oh, the tax dollars
that we're sending to Israel is now becoming a liability argument is sweet. Okay. Sweet.
Glad you recognize that that's a big fucking domestic policy issue, right? It's a big issue
for Americans. But what they don't understand that, what they don't understand in this situation
is that the underlying demand here is not simply to stop giving money to Israel.
That's a huge demand.
It makes total sense that people are making that demand, but the ask goes beyond that.
The underlying reason for why people want to stop this is because we want to bring Israel
to heal.
Okay?
Yeah.
Now that Benjamin Ninyahu is also in favor of cutting military aid, which by the way,
I don't even think he is. I think they're just lying because there's always a way that the Pentagon will continue supporting Israel.
I mean, they've done this before. There have been instances where like, there are different secret budgets within the Pentagon where they'll reappropriate the assets and will consistently sell Israel jet fuel, for example.
like this has always been the, this has always been the modus operandi, but regardless, regardless,
when he says the goal here is to, you know, no longer need to rely on American aid, American
support. Yeah, they will always circumvent. They will always find a way. The real goal here is to
not only uh... doing arms embargo against israel
but also
uh... but also
punish israel hold israel accountable
and i
i think that it's time
that we
we know so
from the
uh... military support
can you give me a time table
i said let's start now
and do it over the next decade over the next ten years but i want to start now
i don't want to wait
for the next Congress. I want to start now. And it could go down very fast.
Donald Trump on Iran, full measure with Cheryl Atkison, full interview.
Donald Trump on Iran, government investigation in the NFL, midterm
election. Sorry for the loud bang there.
This week, prospects for talks to end the Mideast conflict between the U.S.
and Iran, but it's difficult diplomacy.
Make a deal and then they break it. Then they make a deal, they break it.
It's a difficult group.
President Trump joins me for an exclusive interview on the one story that has the world's attention.
So is it accurate to say you think the combat operations are over and done?
No, I didn't say that.
I said they are defeated, but that doesn't mean they're done.
We cover concerns foreign and domestic.
How do you feel today about the Republicans' chance in the midterms?
and even terrible all-American issues.
The Justice Department is investigating the NFL.
Do you think this is price gouging
on America's favorite sport?
They're making a lot of money.
They could make a little bit less.
And they could be...
This week, my White House interview with President Trump.
Thank you for joining us on Full Measure.
Thank you.
First of all, we're glad that you are safe and that your family's safe after the latest
attempt on your life.
How are you and the family doing?
Very good.
It was an interesting evening, but I felt very secure, and I think Secret Service did a very good job.
The judge apologized to the suspect for the treatment that he's gotten in jail.
Well, I heard that, and then after watching that, they went back a couple of years,
and he was very apologetic to another suspect who I didn't even know about,
But he was also the same judge, was very apologetic to somebody else having to do with a similar subject.
And not even believable, actually.
On Iran, would you say the war is over?
Is it paused or is it very much active?
Well, they're militarily defeated.
In their own minds, maybe they don't know that.
But I think they do because they deal with them.
And we cannot ever let Iran have a nuclear weapon.
But they are militarily defeated.
They have no Navy.
They have no Air Force.
They have no anti-aircraft weaponry.
They have no radar.
They have no leaders.
Their leaders are gone.
The first set, the A team is gone, the B team is gone,
and part of the C team is gone.
But I think we're dealing with people
that have a certain power, it's very interesting because, you know, they make a deal and then
they break it, then they make a deal, they break it.
It's a difficult group.
But from a military standpoint, I mean, if we left today, it would take them twenty
years to rebuild.
Where are we in the war if we've not yet gotten the nuclear materials, the enriched
uranium from them?
Well, we'll get that at some point, whatever we want.
have it surveilled, you know, I did something called Space Force and they
are watching that every, if somebody walked in they can tell you his name, his
address, the number of his badge. No, we have that very well surveilled. If
anybody get near the place we will know about it and we'll blow them up, we'll
blow them up. So is it accurate to say you think the combat operations are over
and done? No, I didn't say that. I said they are, they are defeated but that
doesn't mean they're done, we could go in for two more weeks and do every single target.
We have certain targets that we wanted, and we've done probably 70 percent of them.
But we have other targets that we could conceivably hit.
But even if we didn't do that, you know, that would just be final touches.
But even if we didn't do that, it would take them many years to rebuild.
Some politicians I think would be prepared to take a political hit on something as important
to so many Americans as oil and gas prices in the short term, even for something very
important in the long term.
The political and media climate, I don't think they really allow for this sort of thing.
They want immediate reactions and responses.
Well, I think it's easy when I say it and somebody like you says, you know, answer that
question and gives me a couple of seconds, it's really easy to answer.
We cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon, because they're crazy.
We cannot let them have access to nuclear.
Obama did it.
If I didn't terminate the Iran nuclear deal, they would have had it.
And they would have used it on Israel and the Middle East right now.
And maybe beyond, you know, they actually had rockets that you saw that the other day
that could reach Europe.
They would have used it a hundred per...
And by the way, not 50% or 100%, they would have used it.
They were dying to get it then.
So I took Barack Hussein Obama's horrible Iran nuclear deal,
I terminated it at my first time.
Not totally.
China sent man pads.
Iran is playing like a fiddle, sleepy Trump.
I don't know if they have.
I mean, they have the railways.
So it would be totally justifiable if China did do that.
What is this?
I'll say don't Graham
Kim Jong-un inspects citizens to ensure that they are having fun
Move to North Korea God damn dude. How does this happen? I just don't get it. I
Mean whatever flows people's boats, right?
It should be illegal for China to make cars. I can't believe the mods aren't doing something about this. Oh, yeah, this is awesome
No wonder you're a filthy commie. This is what you played as a child. So I hear Amanda mistook you for Che Guevara snake
Yeah, I mean this is by the way that has 300,000 318,000 likes. How is this possible, bro?
I've heard working under pressure. I've never heard fun under pressure
Hello. Yes. Hello. It is me. Mr. Fun
Exclusive US intelligence indicates China is preparing weapons shipment to Iran and
intimate fragile ceasefire sources say, um, hey, hey, why did we get to have a say here?
Okay. Does Iran have a right to defend itself? I certainly think so. They do. Okay. If, uh,
this is from April 11th, by the way, this is last month. This is not from tomorrow. This
is from last month. But I think that that assessment was not happening. Delivery would
be island too. Yes, they would use the railroads if they were to deliver anything successfully
in my opinion. So we'll see. I don't know. But we'll find out if America chooses the
wage war with Iran again.
So I still am shocked that Trump is doing this summit, by the way.
I think it's a real weakness for Donald Trump to continue with the summit.
It basically proves that Trump is not only in a weakened position against Iran, but certainly
against China as well. Because they've delayed it one time, the Chinese got real mad at that.
So I feel like there isn't, if they can't even delay it a second time, I think,
I think this is, this is horribly bad.
knocked out Solomoni very important if you didn't knock out Solomoni I think it would
have been a different country it would have been more competent but he was an evil genius
but he was an evil guy the roadside bombs etc. killed many many people named so many
people the legs the arms the face so that was a big thing to come out and then very
big I don't say I don't know the role so important if you think I'm thinking which
is the most, but when those beautiful B2 bombers attacked eight months ago and
attacked their potential nuclear site, they would have had a nuclear weapon
within two weeks if we did. That's why I had to go in. I knew that they were going
to have a nuclear weapon and we obliterated there. I call it the nuclear
dust. There's a lot of nuclear dust, but we obliterated the site at one o'clock in
in the morning with no moon, you couldn't see a thing.
And they went in and stealth, they went in
and they did their job, they dropped those bombs
and they landed perfectly and it just obliterated.
If we didn't do that,
they would have already blown up Israel in my opinion.
Israel would have been blown up with a nuclear weapon.
What's next in light of all of this for the U.S. and NATO?
Well, NATO has proven to be a paper tiger.
they were there to help.
And you know, this is the interesting,
there's many of those NATO countries use,
we don't use the strait, we don't,
in fact, boats are coming up to Texas, Louisiana,
and Alaska, and filling up with oil.
We don't need the strait.
We were doing it to help Israel and Saudi Arabia
and Qatar and UAE, others.
We don't need it, it's an amazing,
We don't use it.
We had 1% and we did that as a favor.
And we're now producing more oil and gas than Russia and
Saudi Arabia put together.
Think of that, Cheryl.
If you take everything that Russia does, everything that
Saudi Arabia puts out, we produce much more oil and
gas than Russia and Saudi Arabia put together.
And by the end of this year, that number will probably double.
On some domestic issues, one of them
a lot of people are interested in involving the NFL.
The Justice Department is investigating the NFL
for moving a lot of viewers from free broadcast
television to more expensive pay programming
like Amazon Prime, Netflix, Peacock, and YouTube,
where the NFL makes more money.
Do you think this is price gouging on America's favorite
sports or the government doing anything about it?
It's tough. You got people that love football. They're great people. They don't make enough money to go and pay this. It's tough.
And they could be killed.
Bro, why does he sound and look like this, by the way?
Trump with a triple scroller on true social ripping, Justice Gorsuch and ACP with certain Republican-nominated justices we have on the Supreme Court, the Democrats don't really have to pack the court any longer.
I should be the one wanting to pack the court.
Why does he sound so defeated?
He looks and sounds like shit. What the fuck is happening?
They hit him with a cat dart, bro.
What's happening?
killing the Golden Goose. I mean, they have that stupid kickoff thing that you can't watch.
It's unwatchable. I hate the games where they, you know, they have the new phony kickoff.
I don't think it's any safer. I hope college football doesn't do that. Do you know what
I'm talking about?
I'm not a football fan.
You are not a football fan. These people know what I'm talking about. They ruin the game.
But they have to be careful because others have tried this and all of a sudden you don't
have a sport anymore, probably will.
The government will step in and do something.
There's something very sad when they take football away from many, many people.
Very sad.
I don't like it.
So do you think the government will step in and do something?
I don't like it.
I don't like it.
They're making a lot of money.
They could make a little bit less.
They could let the people see.
You have people that live for Sunday.
They live.
They can't think about anything else and then all of a sudden they're going to have to
to pay $1,000 a game, it's crazy, so I'm not happy about it.
More with President Trump from the White House
after a short break.
How do you feel today about the Republicans' chance
in the midterms?
And if the Republicans were not to hold control of Congress,
how does that change your strategy as president?
Well, they'll find a reason to impeach me,
even though a lot of people said they had the greatest
first term in the history of it.
They'll try to impeach me, probably.
But see, we don't play that game.
We don't play like them.
They play dirty.
They have bad policy.
If they had normal policy, it would be a lot tougher,
frankly.
But when they have men in women's sports,
transgender, mutilization of your children for everyone,
open borders.
Transgender for everybody.
Transgender for every country, criminals.
We took in 25 million people over the Biden four years,
and 11,888 were murderers, most of whom, substantially more
than 50%, committed more than one murder,
Welcome to America.
We took in drug dealers and people
from mental institutions that would close up.
They would empty entire mental institutions
into our country.
They would take a mental institution
in a South American country, open it up, bring these people
into our country, let them go, close the institution,
and whatever country it may be in, save a fortune.
And Biden allowed this to happen.
Now we have the strongest borders we've ever had.
As you know, for 11 months, they say
nobody has come into our country illegally.
You know why nobody tries?
Nobody makes a trip up.
The trip is not worthwhile because they
know they're not going to get through.
So once they know that, they don't make the trip.
But we're running a great country.
We're respected by everybody now. Again, we weren't respected.
We were a laughing stock for four years. We were a very, very unsafe place.
You know, murders are down now to the lowest in 125 years, the year 1900.
But we were a country that was a dead country and now we're the hottest country.
Yeah, definitely.
You look like the hottest leader of the hottest country anywhere in the world.
things are looking really great. And so is Donald Trump. I don't fucking want to hear
this bullshit over and over again. Do you guys? I feel like we can skip this shit. Okay.
Margaret Brennan, facing Asian moderator CBS chief foreign affairs correspondent says
after hearing the Pentagon classified brief on Iran war impact on US stockpiles. Mark
Kelly says, it's shocking how deep we have gone into these magazines.
He said that Tomahawks attack them, SM3, Thad rounds, Patriot rounds.
So those intercept the rounds and defend ourselves have been hit hard.
He said it will take years to replenish the stockpiles, which could affect hypothetical
US conflict with China.
Oops, Donald Trump, the great nation builder, Donald Trump, the goat, once again, Donald
Trump, the Annihilator of American Empire. You guys voted for this. You enjoy it. I didn't
like what Rokana had to say about China as well. I feel like he's, you know, once again,
like we should not be engaging in unnecessary posturing, unnecessary militancy with China.
We should be moving away from unnecessary militant posture.
It doesn't make any sense.
Democrats, especially Democrats that have ambitions for higher office, ambitions for
becoming the president, becoming the leader of the Democratic Party should definitely
not in any way, shape or form.
In my opinion, talk about fucking war games or saber rattling with China.
That is precisely what led us to this Iranian quagmire to begin with.
It's just more of the same.
With Trump ready to meet Xi, he must get ready, get China to buy more soybeans, make it clear
no Chinese cars in America, stop Chinese companies from abusing workers in the US and
competing unfairly.
It just doesn't make any sense.
I mean, look, I do understand trade protectionism, especially when it comes to EV fleets, right?
I get that.
one of the only manufacturing businesses that we have that remains on US soil.
I wish we could focus on more competitive builds rather than just trying to outright stop
Chinese fleets from entering US soil. Obviously, I understand why.
That's the case. You're going to do that.
I mean, every European car manufacturer that tried to do EV fleets is destroyed.
Dog, I want to buy a BYD, shut the fuck up, dude.
We can't have our only manufacturing business in the United States be weapons, okay?
We can't.
Instead of moving to the direction of, you know, F-250s, F-350s, we should be downsizing
our vehicles and making more competitive products in general and also hyper-focusing on investment,
electrifying our grid and investment in electric vehicles.
Meanwhile, of course, the China menace has destroyed Porsche and not only Porsche, but
also any car manufacturer in Europe that has tried to make competitive EVs, they just simply
cannot make cars that are as reliable and as affordable as Chinese EVs, okay?
Electric vehicles that run on tracks and not roads
We let Detroit do this their stupidity was enabled in a and the external is cooling death for climate changes on accountable trade protection around EV is not ethical
Meanwhile, Canada is getting five BYD dealers and potentially a BYD
potentially a BYD manufacturing plant in Canada soon.
I want to get your thoughts on the China trip because you're doing this tour across three states, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan, talking about competition with China.
And I want to ask, you know, what do you hope to achieve with that?
And how does it relate, if any, to what the president is trying to effort overseas next week?
well i heard your earlier report and i hope the president's going to get a
better deal for a soybean farmers and in the reality is
our soybean farmers are
corn farmers are hurting we need to have more export markets open in china
and around the world
the second thing we learned is that
uh... china has been bringing in investment into the united states
uh... and having some of these factories open up
that are hiring people who are undocumented
uh... abusing ours there's a
uh... a glass manufacturer in ohio
that cannot go on that the president needs to make it clear to china
that they should not be opening up manufacturing in the united states
subsidizing it
and violating the law
and the final point is that they should be
engaged in subsidies of their industry in dumping when i was in cleveland at the
port of cleveland i was horrified
to see chinese steel there why are we getting that from cleveland cliff or an
american steel company
do you feel that this is a bipartisan issue in congress
i'd go at john mullin are was the chair of the china committee and i i have
worked together we don't want any chinese connected cars in the united
states we need to protect
uh... american cars we want to have
uh... a steel be american steel not be importing chinese steel and we don't want
china playing unfairly and then there's some of these companies that they're
setting up in the united states they're not uh... by their violating labor laws
uh... and they simply are not competing on a level playing fear and so on the top
democrat on the china committee and on these issues i often work closely
with john mullin are who's the chair
every liberal on the timeline by the way has uh...
i i
i have to possibly take accountability on this trump posted a row on fox
all really
i don't know if it's like what i'm saying or if it's like people being
unbelievably stupid
or people being cynical,
a song finds out about the majority of the community did not get taught a
school about what led to Pearl Harbor and he shook.
Okay, it's a 59-second clip
in which I, it's just the poll that I ran, okay?
And
and it was shocking to me
that I did, people didn't know about the oil embargo, okay?
What I don't understand is
there's no point where i say that like this uh... you know americans are pearl
harbor anything like that
there's no point where i've ever defended japanese war crimes of actually
uh... you know i've actually spent a good deal of time educating americans on
uh... the heinous war crimes
uh... that that imperial japan uh... committed
one of my most like famous things is uh... is is me receiving a copy of the
fucking red book
in china
which is why a lot of people say
constantly that i'm a fucking agent of the ccp
but the very same people that have said
that i am a chinese communist agent are now running around in critical support
for imperial japan against american imperialism was one of those weird takes
i see floating around left the circles every six months or so
and every time it does it never ceases to sound me out insular the western
leftist
there's never been a moment where i said critical support for a fucking imperial
japan you in you
imbecile
what the fuck are these people talking about
why is it that these people literally hear just
normal explanations
about historical events
but just an explanation of historical events that unfolded
an actual position on this issue that is not favorable to imperial japan
whatsoever
self-described lockheed liberal can't comprehend hearing about america about
historical events without assuming it's critical support for the heinous war
crimes committed by Imperial Japan. The very same guys that are saying I'm a fucking Maoist
are now claiming that I was like in favor of Imperial Japan. What am I supposed to do?
What am I supposed to say? I can't have a normal conversation about like even events
that unfolded while literally ripping into, justifiably ripping into the heinous fucking
shit that Japan did in World War Two only to then turn around and oh my god oh my god
top G you went to Japan and okay I'm but I'm actually fucking permabanding you top G is
not cute nor sweet okay dumbass shut the shut your bitch ass up stupid really you're agreeing
with fucking, you're agreeing with this dipshit? Really? Really funny, dude. Why do I need enemies?
Why do I have ideological opposition when I have fucking dumb ass LARPers in the chat
all the time? There's point to any fucking leftist who's ever defended Imperial Japan.
The very same people that spent months talking about how I'm a fucking agent of the Chinese
Communist Party are now falsely fucking claiming that I'm in favor of Imperial Japan. And they
They know that it's bullshit, but they say it anyway.
Yeah, I'm a Maoist and also a fucking, uh, uh, a, a, uh, hero Hito fan, uh, somehow.
They have nothing.
The owner of the, what the fuck is this?
We should have much lower toss to these nepo baby communists.
They might seem incompetent to be dangerous, but they're repopulous in the most dangerous
ideology of all time.
A hundred million people were killed by communism in the 20th century.
This is what happens every time communists gain critical power.
This is a clip of me by the way.
And Elon Musk goes absolutely.
82,000 likes.
I spent a fucking hour shitting on Imperial Japan explaining to Americans that don't know
about the heinous war crimes of Imperial Japan, specifically in China as well as Korea, exactly
what the Japanese did.
And these fucking dickheads are literally saying, I'm defending Imperial Japan, it's
heinous.
It's like saying I fucking, like, I don't even know what to say.
I'd like there they're like what what how much more anti imperial Japan could I possibly
be by the the very same people that Sam a fucking Maoist one day they literally say
I'm a Maoist even though Mao Zedong killed 100 guerrilla and people and then the next
They say I'm actually in favor of a beer's rent. It doesn't make any fucking sense
Yeah, what's next are they gonna say I'm fucking pro Israel to like what the fuck
It's just a samba every mapped every day and there are already a psycho on for calling
pro-Israeli about those are fucking commies.
Those are communists.
i do i do genuinely feel you have to understand you are the enemy left as
any lies or misrepresentation or perspective is virtuous
yeah we got a fucking cut it with this like uh... uh... ontologically evil
nonsense like it's it's it's genuinely making people dumber
it's legitimately making people dumber and dumber and dumber and dumber it
doesn't make any fucking sense
like this is a new one because i've never heard anybody even say that right
I've never heard a single fucking person even claim that that leftists who are sympathetic
To leftists who are sympathetic to Mao which is what they say about me all the fucking time
Turn around and be like oh, you're actually pro imperial japan. I've never even fucking heard that before
Like they're talking about me they're saying I am
uh, I am uh
Fucking a defender of the Imperial's band me this guy. Okay, this this guy this
Like what the fuck
What the fuck what what are you talking about? What are you saying?
They don't understand how that's contradictory. I don't get how you can't understand that that's
Contradictory at all. I guess they're just hugging at people's lack of knowledge on this issue
Who just banned you from Xi just banned you from China I fear this bullshit. I literally got a 10-year visa, baby
I've probably done more to educate Americans on a deliberately forgotten chapter of World
War II history, but the heinous fucking crimes in the center Japanese war, for example, that
many Americans are oblivious to, which is ironically what I was doing.
I was in the process of educating people on what Japan has done
There's literally in the clip in the clip where this fucking dickhead is falsely misrepresenting my position
There is a fucking Chinese flag behind my head. It's right there. What the fuck are you saying?
God this kind of shit pisses me off to no end I shouldn't openly admit that this pisses me off because
because a lot of people do it on purpose.
They're like, oh, this is what angers,
this is what angers us on the most.
Like we're just gonna keep saying he's like pro,
we're gonna keep saying he's like pro Imperial Japan.
It's disgusting.
Medically stupid baboons.
I don't think I can make my position more clear, you know?
From the people that brought you, Hassan is unbelievably pro-China because he says we
must not wage war with our largest trading partner China and must chart a very different
path forward.
One that revolves around collaboration comes.
LaSonde thinks the rape of non-king is appropriate or non-jing.
Sky News China's tech takeover is America losing a superpower status.
Don't Trump is heading back to China.
Alright, let's do this instead.
Yeah, I'm gonna be more pro-China now.
Suck my dick.
China nearly a decade after his last visit, but this time the stakes are different.
Three industries will decide who dominates the 21st century, and in at least one of them,
the US, is already behind.
So who really is the tech superpower of the world?
And has Washington already made a strategic mistake?
I've got to pee.
What better place to start than with AI?
Donald Trump first defined it as a race for supremacy.
America is the country that started the AI race and as President of the United States
I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it.
There's no doubt America got the best start with the best AI chips, whose sale was restricted
in China and the wealthiest AI firms, their models set the standard.
But what happened next?
Well, I insided Silicon Valley.
leap forward in AI has been described as a Sputnik moment stunning Silicon Valley and
wiping a trillion dollars off global stock markets. DeepSeek wasn't quite as good as America's best
chatbots but the fact Chinese tech talent could make something nearly as good within
feria hardware at a fraction of the cost was a shock to the US AI ecosystem. Fast forward to now
and the latest analysis of leading models shows China's frontier AI still lags a few months behind
America, but comfortably matching its pace. And at times, out in front, have a watch of this.
A scene involving two of America's biggest stars made with a new Chinese model Seed Dance,
it went viral and sent Hollywood into meltdown.
He was a good man!
He knew too much about our Russia operations.
He had to die.
America still leads as one expert puts it with AI brains, where China leads on AI bodies.
China's homegrown engineering talent and manufacturing base producing 90% of the world's humanoid
robots at a speed and cost U.S. firms can only dream of.
As we saw in Berlin last year, American robots may have an edge in innovation and software.
We're told this is the first public demonstration of a humanoid robot carrying out an everyday
task, in this case assembling an engine part in a real workplace, and done so entirely
autonomously without human control.
Even at the time, I wasn't convinced the human robot revolution was a polis.
Then I saw something that made that much harder to argue.
Chinese firm Unitry that built these backflipping kung fu robots were inspired by leading American designs.
But they've made unique innovations and when it comes to low-cost mass production
would kick America's aspirations if there was a robot war tomorrow.
China's essentially planned economy has decided to snatch the robot button and run with it.
Not just financing what it sees as key tech, but using it to inspire a tech-literate public.
The Beijing half-marathon saw humanoid robots lined up alongside real runners,
one reportedly breaking the human record by seven minutes.
One hold the US has on Chinese AI is control the state-of-the-art chips used to build the frontier models.
Export bans prevented China from having them but chip makers and some in the White House argue removing Barrett's will work to America's advantage by making Chinese AI reliant on American tech.
Something China understands too. Its AI firms want the best.
Yeah, this is Jensen Huang's assessment as well.
And it's probably smart but perhaps too late.
Chicken nuggies and sauce. No, this is mad as you make kofta. It's what's mad as you make in English
It's kofta. It's like it's like a vegan kubi day kind of but what is it? Is it red lentil red lentil? Yes
It's a lentil lentil balls
It's hardware, but Beijing wants its industry to make rival Chinese chips.
So for now, despite the US easing restrictions, China isn't buying.
My understanding is that their cloud companies want to buy these chips.
Of course they didn't.
Central government has not let them,
Chinese central government has not let them
as of yet buy the chips because they're trying
to keep their investment focused
on their own domestic industry.
So we have not sold them chips as of yet.
In Mr. Trump's talks with President Xi,
we can expect AI hardware to become literal bargaining chips.
One thing all tech superpowers need is, well, power,
especially in the era of AI.
But this is where the real bottleneck appears,
and it could decide the entire race.
The biggest limiting factor in better AI
isn't more or better chips.
It's these things.
We've been to see the machines powering
America's AI boom, gas turbines,
with US manufacturers struggling to meet demand.
The wait time for one of these
used to be about 18 months.
It's now closer to four years.
As the US and Europe is finding out the hard way,
their fossil fuel dominated energy grids
are struggling with AI's insatiable thirst for electricity, not so in China. Though more
than half of Chinese electricity still comes from burning coal, clean energy tech, solar,
wind and batteries are replacing it and meeting China's growth in demand. Whereas the Trump
administration, as we witnessed first hand, has been actively dismantling US clean tech
growth.
We don't do wind because wind is a disaster, it's a very expensive joke, frankly.
In the case of wind farms like this one in New England, halting some projects that already
built.
Just a single rotation of this turbine would generate enough electricity to power the average
American household for a year.
President Drill Baby Drill is instead backing US fossil fuels.
He's expected to lean on China to buy more US oil and gas when he gets to Beijing.
But is it a smart long-term strategy?
In the first seven months of last year, China exported 120 billion in clean energy tech
like solar panels compared to America's 80 billion in exports for oil and gas.
And Mr Trump's epic.
That by the way, 100 billion, 120 billion in Chinese green energy goes a much longer
with an 80 billion in oil. Because that every time they're talking about Chinese exports
of renewable energy, they're talking about a permanent mechanism to displace reliance
on oil and gas. Because when you get oil and gas, that's a one-time transport that you
you are going to burn and use and be done with, that means that you are going to have
additional demand year over year over year.
When you ship one solar panel, that's a one-off purchase that you can use for the rest of
your life.
So $120 billion in renewable energy exports is ultimately displacing billions of dollars
worth of energy trades that could be made.
This is the reason why America is anti-renewable energy.
Oil is a consumable, gas is a consumable.
Renewable energy is not.
at least as far as we know infinite amount of solar power coming from the
sun it's free. Of course solar panels also degrade over time there's also
additional manufacturing needs there's like going to be repairs and things of
that nature but once again
The main source of energy is coming from a potentially infinite supply, the sun.
Furing hasn't helped.
Sure, US oil firms are profiting hugely from oil prices boosted by the Iran conflict, but
the shock to global energy markets is driving a scramble for alternatives.
These solar exports doubled in March and exports in its EVs are up 78% in the first quarter.
And yes, those EVs.
We have an amazing product to show you tonight.
America, or should that be Elon Musk, was the first to make a globally successful...
So we start blocking the sun, buddy.
If you think America...
If you think capitalists could figure out a way to rent out the sun, they wouldn't do
you're out of your mind, okay? Of course, if given, if given the opportunity, if they,
if the capitalists could place an enclosure around the sun or the wind, they would do
it.
Yes, well, you're talking about a satellite trying to do giant space mirrors. That's
a totally different idiotic project. I know, I know.
Like the ones that can take sunlight and ping it back to like a specific, a specific location
if they want to. The iron supply chain has put it in the
fast lane. For the first time last year China's BYD sold more electric vehicles globally than
Tesla. Impressive acceleration given, Musk's firm was making four times more cars than its
competitor just six years ago. So how did China catch up so fast? It has a lot to do with price.
In China, Tesla's cheapest model is still three to four times more expensive than BYDs.
To be fair, it has double the range and more than triple the power, but even when matched on specs,
there's still a clear price gap. China has heavily subsidized its EV makers, but analysts argue
its cars are cheaper due to stronger supply chains and the vertical integration of its industry.
The US, however, can be much more confident in another field that will dominate our near future
space. Three, two, one. While Tesla is being usurped by Chinese rivals, Elon Musk's other
company Space X and its commercial rivals in America are way ahead in space. In the last five
The US has pulled ahead of China last year, performing more than twice as many orbital
launches, a league almost entirely down to SpaceX, credited with 85% of all launches
last year.
But even here, there's a catch, as we found out a few weeks ago, in Texas.
This is the iconic, the historic mission control at Houston, where they're controlling the
whole of the art and its operations.
Come take a look.
we have some news to share with you. As of 30 seconds ago, you are now closer to the
moon than you are to us on Earth.
America is celebrating to ending the first humans back to the moon for more than 50 years.
Ladies and gentlemen, your Artemis II crew.
Well, here at NASA they talk about moon joy and our destiny is to break the plug.
NASA has plans fully backed by the president to land Americans on the moon again as early
as 2028.
But there's a chance it will be a Chinese flag on the arm of the next human on the moon.
China is targeting a crewed lunar landing in 2030.
Though it's well behind America's space industry, China has enough know-how to pull
off a moon landing that would inspire its citizens and dent the ego of Donald Trump.
As with everything else in tech, China is catching up fast.
And it's doing it using a playbook America once wrote itself.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson is a very funny conspiracy theory on this where he thinks that we, I
American like NASA knowing full well that American capitalists will never actually engage in the final frontier the space race
without a market competitor like a like a
global competitor
chose to actively
Cut out China in their international cooperation by design
When they didn't even do this for cosmonauts when they didn't do this for the Soviets, right?
Or at least the Russians
with the hopes that China would advance their ambitions in the space race, with the hopes
that America would justify additional funds to NASA to now compete with China as we once
did with the USSR.
Since World War II, I think it's a joke more so than anything else, but the underlying
truth is still correct, which is that America will never engage in something that isn't
like immediately profitable, unless there is some kind of international competition.
SES and the state-funded science-led Manhattan Project, the US government supported science
and engineering at levels never seen before, credited as a key driver of its 20th century
rise to super-powered them.
For the last two decades, China has effectively done the same and within two years is expected
to surpass the US in public R&D spending.
And one sort of numbers shows just how much this is paying off.
A new analysis of frontier research fields from quantum computing.
Do I care about the spaceship? Yes.
Of course I care about the spaceship. What are you talking about?
My brother is literally a rocket scientist.
Of course I care about it.
to superconductors finds in 2003 the US led China in 60 of 64 areas. Now the tables have
turned with China leaving the US in 57 out of the 64. The next item is a freeze on all
federal hiring, accepting the military and a number of other excluded categories.
Rather than scrambling to win the R&D race, Donald Trump appears to be doing the opposite.
Could you imagine Biden doing this? I don't think so.
The White House cut $4 billion half the budget of the National Science Foundation, America's
Science Funding Body. And Mr. Trump has just sacked the entire National Science Board,
planning to replace 22 of the most preeminent...
Not counting the satellites of modern Earth, what is the utility of space exploration?
the scientific discovery process alone is responsible for so many things that you currently
take advantage of, like, you know, the suits that firefighters use, your microwave, like,
it's science, man. What, what kind of fucking idiotic caveman mentality is this, the idea
that like, oh, why do we care about unlocking new mysteries
through scientific experimentation?
I find it shocking when people say stuff like that because
it's like antithetical to human nature almost not to make a
naturalistic argument, but if there is a couple identifiable features of mankind, it's that
we are endlessly curious and try to understand certain things that are inexplicable right
now.
That is how society has progressed over time.
That's why we have all of these new technologies that we take for granted that have dramatically
improved our lives. Space exploration is considered the final frontier for that reason.
I don't understand how anyone could point to that and go, why the fuck are we spending money on
this dude, this sucks. I know whitey on the moon, I know. But you can do both.
The USSR was capable of doing both as a matter of fact.
US scientists charge with steering its future with tech bosses and investors.
But what presidents before him knew and President Xi of China certainly appreciates
is you don't get a technological edge without a steady talent pipeline.
And here, America may be faltering.
More than 10,000 PhD level scientists and engineers
have left the federal workforce as a result of cuts.
Tougher border controls also risk driving top talent away.
And that could be bad.
from Einstein's Elon Musk, immigrant scientists help make America.
Oh, come on, Elon Musk. American Nobel Prizes since the age.
What fucking scientist is Elon Musk?
How dare you? How dare you put Einstein
in the same category as Elon Musk?
Elon Musk is not a fucking scientist, bro.
What dumb fuck bullshit is this?
What what science is Elon Musk ever contributed to?
I think he has one patent to his name.
God, I despise this mentality so much.
Yeah, he's trying to find the upper limit of the human body and how much ketamine
one can consume without... or how much ketamine will actually finally kill a human. That's
what he's trying to fucking find. That's his real scientific experiment, long-standing one.
What? Is what Trump is trying to push instead of renewables?
For much of the 20th century, most coal in West Virginia was mined by men working deep underground.
for the longest time his only patent was like the the charger mouth shape of the Tesla charger
yeah if anything Elon Musk has shown that yes even someone who is unbelievably autistic can
actually be stupid as fuck. Going against decades of, you know, propaganda against the
autistic savant. So I guess that's his wonderful contribution.
He's not even actually autistic. Okay, buddy. Come on.
This is like when people get mad when I say Nick Fuentes is Mexican. They're like, whoa,
he's not one of us. It's like, there's no need. There's no need for denial of reality.
Hey, saying Elon Musk is not autistic is crazy, okay?
The 1970s, a new kind of mining was starting to transform West Virginia.
Calm down, maybe you don't feel the direct pain of the current economic situation, but when people are hurting, it's easy to see how people wouldn't be on board with this business.
space race, not saying it's useless, it's just fixing things down here before going
up there is not caveman mentality, yes it is.
You can make that argument about everything because the, the, it is, it is, it just is.
It's anti-science.
It's ridiculous.
I already explained to you exactly why there's a million different things that have come
out of the space race initially, and I also told you that you can do both.
And I even gave you an example of a country that did both, okay?
Tremendous development, going from an agrarian, you know, farming peasant society to one that
actually puts someone in space before the United States of America ever did.
It's called the USSR, okay?
That's number one.
Number two, the idea that we're like, oh, well, you know, people are struggling.
of course they're gonna have the wrong opinion. Okay, well I'm still gonna call
it out. What do you want me to do?
People are suffering. Why do we care about funding research? People are
suffering. Why do we care about funding the NIH? Why? You can say you can make
that are gonna anything people are suffering people are suffering why do
we actually fund the arts people are suffering why do we fund anything I can
see how people feel that way is not my take okay then why are you speaking for
other people I think I think it's fine
Yeah, NASA budget for fiscal year 2026 is $24.4 billion by the way. How much is the Iran cost so far not enough?
Yeah, we stop spent we stop sending whiteies to the moon a long-ass fucking time ago and
I haven't seen any of that funding divert back to social safety nests
I love you all, you're going from Einstein to Elon to Kennedy to Trump is very quintessentially
explanation of your state of the nation, isn't it? Yeah, I mean, it is.
That is, if you believe in NASA, that's true. I don't, they lie, right?
Axios, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Spear is quietly trying to derail a left-wing congressional
candidate champion by AOC. Shapiro on his team have probably told allies that he disapproves
Cruz, a Chris Robb, and it's taken step to block his path according to three people familiar
with discussion. Shapiro's privately advised Philadelphia's building trade unions to avoid
inadvertently helping, helping rab the loan progressive in the race by attacking one of
the center left opponents. Axios, an attempt to block Chris rap from winning the democratic
nomination.
Source say Josh Shapiro suggested that the building trades, which are backing another
candidate, Sharif Street, avoid running negative ads against the third contender, Ala Stanford.
in Stanford has seen a traditional Democrats who share similar voters.
I will die on this hill.
Elon, his biographer, authorizes and contested it saying it was self-diagnosed, not formal
one.
Yeah.
Who cares?
That's crazy.
You have eyes and a brain, right?
Like I can't believe there is this is the hill to die on the idea that like Elon is
what faking behaving in the way that he behaves.
I come on dude.
No one is that good of an actor.
Like what's more believable that Elon Musk is just like faking the mannerisms of autism
to a fucking T?
Or he actually is autistic and he's never gotten like a medical diagnosis, who cares?
Faking autism is the most autistic thing you can do.
Also, yeah, what is he getting out of it?
I'll shut up now. Thank you. I just don't think that he's anyone is capable of behaving
that autistic Lee without actually being autistic.
huge Trump rage post now on truth. Oh my God again. People trying to tell House Abbey who's
autistic when real recognizes real. I mean, it's ironic because this community always says
I'm autistic and I've never gotten a fucking proper medical diagnosis either. Okay, it's
true. So I guess neither me nor Elon Musk are autistic. What now? What now? Okay. Yeah,
you like that? You like that chat?
My uncle with 300 trains in his basement also wasn't diagnosed. Yeah, my uncle too. Ironically
No, rest in peace to my uncle, who was a massive fan of model trains.
The signs were there.
Yeah.
Have you ever seen me stimming inside of a fucking train dude?
Not autistic at all, buddy.
Okay.
That's, that's neurotypicality peak.
All right.
No one has been more neurotypical than me inside of a fucking train.
Will you please acknowledge how able is your action against special interest groups is hyper fixations are natural for all social classes of autistic people and furthermore and really appreciate if you realize just how important fossil fuels are for trains obstructing trains that direct hatred and attack the autistic community respectfully.
We can't let Iran have all that juice. Thank you.
I'm just saying dude. I'm just saying to all the chatters. Yeah, the, all the chatters
I spend, uh, uh, most of their free time painting Warhammer figurines, for example,
It's called being neurotypical snap my ass.
It makes sense to be excited.
Luxury Communist taking business class?
Brother, it's the Amtrak train between New York City.
What do you think the distinction between business class and coaches?
It's just one seat.
snap my hand. Yeah. I think you guys are wrong. Choo choo boy. I mean, I'm glad to
be called chuchu boy i'm honored
i love your autism guys but you act like you're embarrassed to be neurodivergent
oh my god it's f***ing memes man i don't give a
s*** it's f***ing memes brother sister damper
it's memes okay i know we're having a conversation about autism
currently, which is probably the worst time to make jokes. Okay, I know it's hoboken no
joke in time. I know. Bro thought jokes would fly. What led to the embargo was on anyway,
wonder if Hassan et al will be equally shocked when they hear about imperial japan civilian death toll.
It's just like everyone is literally in her replies being like you're a fucking idiot.
Of course he knows what Imperial Japan did.
He was explaining what Imperial Japan did in that same fucking stream that you saw a
clip from.
This is Tucker Carlson on SNL.
Oh, it took place in New York this week.
Here to give you his thoughts on fashion's biggest night
is conservative political commentator Tucker Carlson.
All right.
Thank you, Collin.
The Met Gala, a night of fashion and fun.
Huh. Really?
Yes. Come on, everybody.
Let's all prance around in our $100,000 clown outfits
and watch the American Empire crumble.
What are we doing?
What's going on?
So you didn't like this year's Met Gala?
Oh, no, I loved it, because when I go to a museum,
I don't want to talk about history.
No, I want to look at the rock in a skirt.
If you smell what the rock is cooking,
because I do, it's gender confusion.
That's the goal. That's the goal now.
I don't think that's the goal.
I think it's just meant to be fun.
Okay, well, what about Madonna?
She named herself after the Virgin Mary,
and you want to know my favorite thing
about the mother of Jesus Christ?
Oh, I know, the big pirate ship on her head.
And I have to be attracted to this?
You don't have to be attracted to any of it.
I mean, weren't there any outfits you liked?
I mean, Heidi Klums was fun.
Oh, yes, the left has finally gotten
what they've always wanted.
They put the Statue of Liberty in a burka.
Ha ha ha!
Okay, that's fire. That's fire.
That's actually good.
Nick Mullen is the best at this.
obviously. I think my Tucker Carlson is not bad either, but that was good.
Okay. No, you know, you know that's not what she was doing.
What's next? Does the Chrysler building become the anti Chrysler building? What are we doing? What's going on?
Is this the New York we'd want to live in, Colin?
Don't you live in, like, Maine?
Yes. And let's talk about Maine.
M-A-I-N-E?
Huh. Really?
The E is silent.
But who silenced it? And why?
What the hell are you talking about?
You're talking about the silent E in Maine now.
I'm glad you brought it up, Colin.
I did.
And what does that E stand for?
Oh, I know, euphoria.
No.
Oh, yes. Euphoria.
And no, I'm not talking about the feeling I get
when I press one for English.
Oh!
Oh!
Come on, man.
Oh! And look, who's next coming down the runway?
It's Jafar Jackson,
who had the gall to show up after starring
in the Michael Jackson movie.
Oh, yes. Some people were very upset about that movie.
Yeah. And they should be.
The movie ends in 1988,
So obviously, they avoided something serious that needs to be acknowledged.
The part of Michael Jackson's life no one wants to talk about anymore.
Of course, I'm talking about the part when he was a white man.
Okay.
Oh!
Sorry, kids.
Michael Jackson doesn't get to live a beautiful white life anymore.
Huh.
Who does that remind me of?
Oh, that's right.
All of us.
That's the rule.
That's the goal now.
Shemona?
Yeah.
More like Sheimania.
That is, that's actually fire.
This is shockingly, this is a shockingly good Tucker bit.
I mean, the impression needs a little bit of work for sure, but
the writing is solid.
That's just awful.
Now, a word from our sponsor.
What?
Round Bananas.
You wanna eat bananas without looking gay?
Try Round Bananas.
You can't do ad-rees on the show.
Now, let's talk about Asap's Rocky outfit.
Asap Rocky's outfit.
He was on the red carpet wearing my least favorite color,
African American.
Come on, that's good as fuck. That's actually, um, yeah, the, the classic bit is Nick Mullen,
uh, obviously doing the, there's a lot of gay porn on the timeline. Sometimes of your,
sometimes of me, sometimes of my loved ones. I find myself jerking off to it. What's going
on? What are we doing? How do we get here? But still.
Oh, it's it's banger is a banger
It's not me. Maybe it's you
So many questions. What's going on?
That's the Obama impression by the way, what is this?
Oh my god
What the fuck where did that voice come from, bro? Oh my god was like come on
How could this fucking white boy and friends do a good?
That's crazy. What's the two?
Minded of the great words of our founding fathers makes it foot
We the people in order to form a more perfect union
provide for
The common defense poor do ordain. I'm not finished do
His constitution for the United States of America. What the fuck? How is that possible?
Bro sounds more like Obama than Obama, dude, that is a perfect impression that is crazy
We, we, we can, we can, we have a guest.
I guess you want to say it's, it's a thing, you know,
making a real A Obama, I don't know why.
Donald, I think I've heard enough out of you.
Excuse me, I'm the wish, I'm the wish Trump,
I'm not the real Trump.
Yeah, I mean, this fucking Trump is ass, right?
Like, is the Trump guy is like obviously French.
Now you gotta check out these guys, talk your impressions.
Is Michael Jackson innocent or is he not?
Who is Annie? Why is he asking if she's okay? How old is she? Is it a he? I don't remember.
Michael Jackson. I was a huge fan of the off the wall album. A lot of people say it's
a struggle. I think it's I don't think this guy's impression is, uh, is, is as good as, uh,
Nick Mullins.
Little guy sounds like Zelensky. Yeah. The guy who was trying to do Trump. Yeah. He's like,
Mr. President, Mr. President, Obama, Mr. President, I wish you were still the President.
He's totally wish-trucked, he was totally wish-trucked.
I'm the real deal.
Oh my god, he cooked him on the Trump too, god damn it.
Where are you going, Thomas De Zerff?
Well, he rajouss a chef, eh?
Yes, yes.
Yes, yes, yes.
Thomas De Zerff.
We just created a rule for you.
Are you a professional?
Yes.
I'm a voice actor, so I do this for a living.
one of the video.
What can I say?
Thank you very much.
Thanks for the opportunity.
We will have 3-2-1.
Ami Waena was 3.
Edith Piaf was 2.
Barack Obama was 1.
We agree.
Barack, could you make the final speech please?
Folks!
It's English.
It's English.
It's English.
It's English.
This video will go down in history as one of the greatest from this guy right here.
I am honored to be a part of it and thank you so much.
people want to know is this fake can you really do an Obama impression let me
show you I can start out just with my voice but doing Obama's cadence and if
I slowly start to add some texture to my voice you'll notice it's starting to
sound a little bit different is this blackface is this black voice I'm so
confused
That's fucking crazy
How is this possible he's so good
This is advanced a V
If I put the voice in the back of my throat
that is
You know, it's kind of like that sensation of
Feel like you have a bubble in your throat. How does he do it? I don't know. I can't do it. Oh
Let me be clear. Oh
Yeah, just mine turns into fucking Kermit you trying to get better at joking
You're sounding like a dying Jordan Peterson. So just Jordan Peterson right now. Hasan will
be practicing in private. Okay, don't call me on this. But yes, I will. I will definitely
practice in private. It's not even a joke. And pussy too. He did one of Obama doing
mamba number five a little bit of monica in my life a little bit of erica by my side a little bit
of read is all i need and a little bit of tina's what i see dude what the fuck dude if you close
your eyes, it's literally Obama. Oh my God. This is fucked up. This is fucked up how
good he is. It's a little bit of Sandra in the sun, of course, and a lot of Michelle all night long.
See what I did? I changed up the lyrics.
Wow.
That's brilliant. It's incredible. I've never seen anything like that. That's wild.
I didn't know. I didn't know white boys could do that.
Wow. Wow. We got Professor Cheung that I was watching yesterday and I had to stop.
And we're gonna get back into it now.
They're evolved, they're motivators, and then they're reactions.
Typically grounded in a concrete example.
Or at least that would be the goal if his lectures were strictly about game theory.
What often follows instead in his lecture is a series of assumptions that spiral out of control.
In his first lecture on game theory he provides the example of a dating game where five boys and five girls want to get married.
And then he ranks their attractivist based on three factors.
The first is genes, the second is wealth, and the third is status.
When he brings up factors that control the various elements of these games, they're always a bit suspect.
He might describe one in detail, but then we'll offer a few quick sentences to describe the others and then move on.
It's also a little weird that he almost always has three things to list.
To win a fight, you have to have three things, focus, clarity, and resolve.
And they are intelligence, spies, basically, crime, and science.
And these agents, of course, are called the three of them.
OK, well, that's actually a lot.
Another question I'm left with is how he quantifies any of these.
In the dating game example in his first game theory lecture,
how does one quantify genes?
Okay, so genes is very simple. It means that you're a good looking. It means you're tall.
It means you're healthy. You will live a long time, okay?
Genes is pretty simple to understand. Attractiveness varies across time and culture,
and even within cultures, people can vary considerably in what they find attractive.
This example only works if all the participants are in full agreement on what they find attractive,
which is possible if you're only talking about 10 people. In the context of an abstract dating
game in a high school classroom it's not that big a deal that he leaves things simple.
But this game starts to drift further from the initial premise.
Here's a quick breakdown of how this game evolves.
All the girls want this one guy.
Okay?
And maybe number four, but certainly for number four, but three, two, one, they don't want.
All the women in the world, many, not all, but many, just want to marry actors like Brad
Pitt.
three two and one
They what do they do? Well, they watch Netflix. They watch porn to play video games. They give it up online. Okay, we don't care
Now I'm beginning to understand why he was
So perfect and at home with sneaco and all these other like
Right-wing fucking weirdos. I mean I already had that assumption because of the whole
You know, it's the it's the
Pax Judaica and all this other shit that he was like all these conspiracy theories like the Illuminati that he believed
but now
Now I'm beginning to recognize that there was more to his commentary
He's doing in cells right this entire competition is between you just tune into your goat doing home math
Yes, which of course is
Something that I also have to reluctantly believe now because that's my professor John
5 and 4 for all the women in the world. And this is again, suicidal. This will lead to the death of humanity.
That section was not over the course of an hour long lecture. All of that happened within the same 5 minutes.
Dude, this is really funny to think that he's like teaching a bunch of Chinese high school students in Beijing.
this as a part of his Western philosophy course. Because remember, his job, he's an English
teacher. Or not, he's an English, he got a, he got a degree in English. And now his job
is to teach Chinese students Western philosophy. Okay. I don't know how the fuck the Chinese
firewall, did not capture this man. Dugan is about to drop, hopefully, and Truc on Putin.
Yeah. He had a conversation on, I cannot believe I'm about to say the sequence of words that
I'm about to say. This man, Professor Chiang had a conversation on Sneeko's broadcast on
kick with Dugan. Okay, that's a real thing that happened, which is part of the reason
why Vladimir Putin might have learned about home math by way of Professor Jung to Dugan,
the ears and mind of Lottipoo.
We went from a cute little game about dating to a story about how, when a wider reality
is mapped onto that game, we see that women are so obsessed with status that they are
destroying civilization by wanting to date high ranking men, and are responsible for
creating incels.
What started as a basic game that might have been helpful for learning some abstract concepts,
has turned into a justification for Jiang's own assumptions about the way society is working.
The purpose of this scenario was not to teach people about game theory, but rather to use
what Zhang is calling game theory to explain why the world is the way it is.
This becomes more obvious as he then moves away from the small example to this larger
discussion about these superstructures controlling society by changing the games we play, and
that this will help us determine the life cycle of a civilization, particularly how
they decline and here's how he describes how that happens the moment you give
woman choice they choose to improve their lives by marrying someone bad
God I love this shit so much dude yeah yeah as opposed to men when you give men
choice they don't choose to improve their lives okay
Incredible. Incredible take, sir. Thank you. This is one of my favorite, like, in-cell commentary moments, always, is like, women want to fuck the, you know, sexiest guys they possibly can. It's like, bitch, so do you.
Like, what do you mean? Everyone does. Like, sometimes these people will take on, like, super basic things, right?
sometimes they'll take on like unbelievably basic concepts and be like yeah if you're
attractive then people will give things to you and everyone's like wow what what are you saying
what that's I've never thought about that I've literally never thought about that before you
mean to tell me that attractive people like traditionally attractive people sometimes get
a, you know, upper hand in life, that's, wow, what a great statement from Mother's Day,
sir. I mean, it's the same shit. It's like, oh, yeah, women want to have sex with men.
They find attractive. Okay. And so do men. Men want to have sex with women that they
find attractive. This is not like, like this is no way to live your life. This is not like
rules that you can live your life by this is just like basic shit okay now all
but most and so over time what happens is your society collapses yeah this is
insane yeah over time society collapses if we let women have basic choice in
In their dating partners society will collapse. Oh, wow
What an incredible take sir
That is fucking amazing. That's true. Well, what's the solution?
Making sure that we take away
Making sure that we take away women's choice because otherwise the society's gonna collapse. Why? Uh, well
It's it's it'll just it'll collapse because they won't fuck me and okay
They won't fuck me. Nobody wants to fuck me. If women have the choice to fuck whoever they want to fuck, that means they won't fuck me, okay?
Which is why society is collapsing. Pretty simple.
The other history, the best indicator that a society is not to collapse is if the woman who are wealthy and educated, if they refuse to have children.
This is what happened to the Romans?
Rome did not collapse because women.
Historians have argued a number of factors that led to the fall of Rome,
and Jiang's reading of history is a reductive one that only serves to feed his pet theory that giving women freedom is a signal that civilization is beginning its decline.
This theory is, of course, not unique to Jiang as it's often echoed in online communities that have a lot of hostility towards women.
We're starting to get a small hint of what Jiang's media diet is and how it's affecting the way he sees the world.
But wasn't this lecture supposed to be about learning game theory?
Why are we getting history lessons about Rome?
This is just a product of what his lectures are like spiraling out of control and diving headfirst into his own pet theories about how the world works.
But believe it or not, this first video is probably the one that comes the closest to being a lecture about game theory.
But instead of learning anything about game theory.
What is this? What the fuck? He did it again. Hitler apologia.
Anyhow, Hitler didn't even say that to America, that to Britain. I think he might have planned it, but he didn't say it.
Bro, this guy loves Adolf, dude.
He fucking loves Adolf Hitler. He wants to be Adolf Hitler.
I swear, what the fuck?
I mean, what can you say? What can you say?
Let's run this.
I mean, I don't know how to fight it.
I mean, Churchill, without cell phones and without digital campaigns and farm
bots, was labeled a war monger in the 1930s because he said he'd have to stay.
I meant the empty end, I did.
And they accused him of being a war monger.
And Hitler didn't even say death to America, death to Britain, you know?
I think he might have planned it, but he didn't say it.
Still they accused him of that.
And he-
Oh, it's still they accused them of that.
I met Amy Goodman today. Hell yeah.
Congratulations.
We're learning is that Zhang has a very troubling reading of history and current events. Out of
interest I looked up a few lectures on game theory from other sources on YouTube such as a series
of lectures from Yale professor Ben Pollock. His lectures are dramatically different from Jiang's,
using abstract examples that highlight the different types of games being played.
They are a lot more informative and, dare I say, genuinely educational.
Rational choice can lead to bad outcomes. We put it more graphically before, but that's fine.
He also engages his students, encouraging them to play along with the game examples,
and having them discuss their ideas in class.
Okay, Professor Zhang goes that too when he talks about game theory and home math.
Okay, he's encouraging his in-self followers to also do home-aths in general it seems like a much
better environment for learning than Jiang's classroom. Jiang's lectures often seem more
about advancing his bizarre theories of the world than actually teaching. Stop defending that fraud.
Oh you mean the Yale professor? I know he is a fraud. Of course you didn't mean Professor
young, not my professor, John, students, anything. To make Beast Theory's works,
Jiang constructs elaborate models containing a sweeping story of different political,
historical and psychological forces that shape the world as we see it. All of it is reduced to
a few simple factors that will be given extraordinary explanatory power. A great example of that is in
one of his next game theory videos titled, The World a Game, where he identifies the
factors that determine how likely a society is to triumph long term, and you better believe
of their three of them.
While he'll define what each of these terms means, he doesn't explain how he can assess
cultures on whether they have these factors or how much of these factors exist.
How do you measure whether or not a country has energy or how much of that energy they
have?
He never really explains it, he just asserts that this country has it and this one doesn't.
To describe Jang's larger argument, he believes that powerful nations become lazy and complacent,
allowing the smaller ones which...
This is his best work.
Okay.
This is his best work.
You're just a hater.
Have more energy.
Oh.
Israel will rise up.
Okay.
Beniz and cohesion to eventually rise up and topple them.
brings us back to his ridiculous example of North Korea.
Poverty leads to creativity.
Okay?
No, the thing is that if I were to surmise the future,
I would say right now in East Asia,
I would think that North Korea has a better future than China.
But North Korea...
Oh, come on!
This is the guy.
That's the goat, dude.
That is the goat.
I fucking love dude. What if he's right? Huh?
Yeah, what if he's right? What if Juxia does prevail?
What if socialism with Chinese characteristics is dookie?
And Marx's Leninist Juxia's principles thrive in the in the coming apocalypse.
Isn't the only example he gives he mentions three other nations that are supposedly poised
to become empires. What makes these predictions so incredibly
silly is that they don't operate within a specific time frame. Japan and Germany have
recovered well after World War II, though some of that was due to international support,
but neither of them are poised to become an empire right now. The example of Israel is
even more ridiculous as Jiang mentions persecution going back thousands of years as a motivator.
Will any of these countries rise up alongside North Korea also wouldn't that mean China?
Which is also uh, it was stood a century of humiliation
Wouldn't that also mean that China is supposed to be a thriving empire none of this makes sense
This don't make any dang sense
He can tell us, but since it's been almost a century for two of those three options,
it seems there's no expiration date for these predictions.
This makes these predictions unfalsifiable, which makes them effectively useless.
It's like predicting that at some point aliens will visit the Earth.
It could happen, sure, but if you're not gonna say when, you can't be proven wrong
because it hasn't happened yet, and possibly could at some point in the future.
But whenever Jang is faced with real criticism, he retreats to one of his more common defenses.
I'm just proposing to you a theory of how to understand the world,
but once it actually happens, I can't actually tell you.
Right?
But going as theory, Germany and Japan and Israel will be the three great nations.
He says this a lot, to understand he's presenting a model that is a set of predictions that may or
may not come true, but if there's no way to reach them may not part, how can this model
be tested? And if it can't be tested, it's not very useful.
Janglext used a lot of historical examples to support the models he constructs. From
this lecture he went all over the place he was talking about the warring states of China
in 250 BCE, Alexander the Great's Macedonia in 500 BCE, and the Spanish colonial project
in Central America in the 16th century. All of this interwoven with assessments of the
cultures involved and attitudes of their respective. Wait, what? Chat, was this on being sarcastic
in his jung reverence? Oh my God. Oh my God. Oh my God. No, no, I'm being, I'm being sincere.
No.
Bro, I really, I really, I can't, I can't do that.
I, I'm realizing more and more that it's just no jokes, you know, no jokes.
Bro thought jokes will fly.
I fucking told you there are people on ironic.
We do think you believe this guy.
Your brain is too small to comprehend Jungian theory, true.
People, we can't really assess how he knows any of this when he says this culture is higher in energy or this one is higher in openness.
Because he doesn't really cite any sources or tell us how he's measuring any of this.
But academic rigor is beside the point here.
What's more effective than having any kind of academic standards is the impression that these rapid changes in topics creates.
By flying through so many different times and places, it presents the portrait of someone very well read and educated
that Jiang is a polymath. That there can be a person so learned that they can synthesize knowledge across disciplines
to create these rich theories of how the world works, and Jiang is presenting his game theory framework as something of that caliber.
Not just skipping across different periods of history, but as we'll see later on, entirely different disciplines including science and literature.
As a self-contained theory, all of it actually holds together pretty well because there's a lot of internal consistency
He's clearly put some time into constructing all of this
That's what a giant human is, an intellectual titan, an intellectual titan
That's my goat dude. How dare you?
Feel like this guy's just jealous. Jose? Yeah, it's not Professor Jose. Let me tell you it's Professor Jong
What kind of history have you predicted? Okay?
We're only looking at things in the vaguest of details.
When that model eventually comes into contact with the real world, we can see just how shabby
it is.
For instance, when he takes that model and applies it to more recent history.
Don't worry about America, its technology, don't worry about the economy, don't worry
about these things, okay?
Just worry about yourself one question.
Erane, transforming as a side, or people becoming much more motivated.
In the previous lecture the examples he presented all featured one supposedly weaker side conquering
land from a stronger side, but I highly doubt Iran is going to be conquering any part of
the United States.
That said we can see how Jiang tries to map his ideas on the current conflict, and it
gets pretty silly.
The Shia are not afraid to die.
my fucking go come on man come on come on brother the Shia are not afraid to die
that's what it is they lock in and because they're great religious leader
Altona Kamenei was assassinated by the American Central East.
They are motivated to seek vengeance to...
Bro, he's doing the meme.
It's like there's an ancient Persian culture in Iran.
It's a Shia method where they get very frustrated and seek out revenge when their leadership
is killed alongside hundreds of little girls in a totally unprompted first strike.
Yeah, that's just universal dog. What the fuck are you saying? There is literally no country on
the planet that's like, oh, you killed our leader and also a bunch of civilians in the process.
That's crazy. Well, I guess GGs, you know, there's no country that has done that.
Sunnis hate dying. Yeah. Unlike the Sunnis, the Shia, they don't mind dying at all. Sunnis,
Sunnis hate it. They hate it famously. Very different cultures, very different concepts.
themselves for the great good to seek eternal paradise okay jihad this is how he talks about
the people of iran completely ignoring how unpopular the religious leadership of iran actually is
and all the oppression required to keep the population under control while this doesn't
mean the people of iran want american bombs dropping on them i also don't think they're about to
start at jihad because their leader was killed here's another silly point he makes to show how
how the Iranian soldiers aren't afraid of death.
Yeah, it's like, it's weird because it literally is
a very basic concept that I describe all the time.
And sometimes I use my own personal experience
and like what I've seen in Turkey take place
in the coup that failed, okay?
But this is a consistently held principle
in virtually every country
that has been in the crosshairs of American imperialism
or in the crosses of like any sort of American engagement,
Right, intervention.
People don't like it.
Turns out people like autonomy,
even if they don't favor the administration and the leadership,
the one thing that they even favor less than that
is a foreign alien invading force coming to the country.
This is not a Shia framework, okay?
The Vietnamese were not Shia.
You understand the Taliban was not Shia, the Iraqi.
Well, there was some Shia there, but by and large,
people weren't all Shia.
OK.
This is normal.
The fucking normal concept.
They were spiritually Shia? That's fun.
The jurors are not afraid of death. And we're already seeing that, where the Americans have already blown up and destroyed during the Navy.
The details of the operation, what defensive options the Navy...
And no, they haven't. They... Oh my God. Oh my God. I just realized, I realized that the more I hear from Professor Jung, the more annoyed I get.
I
Realized that like I can't even keep up the memes when I hear him go on a long tangent about anything
especially shit that I
Definitely know a lot more than he does on okay
If you had any motivations of everyone involved is never explored. It was just stop laughing
This is why they will build statues of him in Iran and not you. I mean, that's fine
I haven't even gotten a fucking Lego bit dude Ryan Grim got one before me, which I mean that's my go here
He deserves it, but
Yeah, by the way between me and Professor Chiang we're both the same level of professor
Which is to say neither of us have a PhD anyway
Darn Muslims on one of their jihad's if all of this sounds incredibly someone sending me a clip of New York is talking shit
About him quick his mood is spiraling. Yeah, give me a hog real quick that wants to kill me
I need to watch a video from some fucking Italian hog
That always puts me in the right mindset. It puts me in a good mood.
Simplistic and silly, it's because it is.
And when looking at his models in a modern context, it also reveals that they don't quite have the predictive power that he claims they do.
He's simplified the story of history and is trying to map it off to the present, and he is also similarly simplified.
It may make for a nice easy story that you can digest, but it doesn't actually constitute a real or deep knowledge of anything that's happening.
there's an interesting turn in later lectures where he starts walking things
back. This is a class focused on intellectual speculation. It's meant to
be fun. It's meant to make us more curious about the world. It's supposed to
hide in our critical thinking skills. And in a later lecture, he walks it back
even further. So I'm not an expert. I'm not even a professor. Yes, I understand.
But what I do is I engage in speculation for fun, for entertainment, okay? So
So just see this as a fun class where we're going to explore some fun topics that have
no scholarly basis, okay?
Imagine your teacher opening up your class saying we're just going to have some fun
speculating on some stuff with no scholarly basis.
The timeline here is really important, as these lectures where he starts sounding more
defensive began to happen after he started blowing up in March of 2026.
I suspect he's doing this in response to the increased criticism he's been getting now
that his profile has significantly risen. A lot of people, right, a lot of people talked big shit
and said Professor Hassan, which is not my real name, my real name is Professor Jihad, or Dr.
Jihad rather. I don't have a, I'm not a professor, I'm a doctor. A lot of people said,
Dr. Jihad, where is your PhD in racism?
Where's your whiteboard, they said.
Here it is.
Okay?
That's right.
Do you understand now?
This is how it works.
is how it works. PBS. Oops. PBS. Dr. Chihad. But his board looks cooler. Okay, well,
working on it. What are you going to teach us today? We are going to learn about CUSSI.
Okay. We're going to learn about CUSSI. What commie says, thinking for the 30 gift to subs
over, thinking for the 25 gift to subs. Damn, I bring one bit back and hella people are
in the chat, lasering me with, with gifties. Yes, today we're going to learn about Cousy.
This is an ambulance, okay? This is an ambulance. It's a type of a car, okay? It's a type of
car. This is a police car. It's also another type of a car. Okay. When one car falls in
love with another car, they have a baby car. Sometimes a bus. Okay. Now, in the car cinematic
universe, okay? The fact that there are female cars and male cars and also baby cars implies
that these cars have a cussie, which is, of course, a car and a pussy, okay, car plus
pussy equals pussy. That's right. I'm going to do it again. Car plus pussy equals pussy.
Okay? Now let's talk about car universe 9-11. In cars cinematic universe, New York City exists.
This is a plane. Also exists in the car cinematic universe. These are the Twin Towers. Now also
known as the World Trade Center.
On September 11, 2001, in the car cinematic universe, one of the planes hit the towers.
cars, nine, 11. Now also in the car cinematic universe, okay? When cars, nine, 11 happened,
tower seven did not fall. There's also a tower seven. It was right here. Okay. Okay. Seven.
What does this mean?
That means that Carr Dick Cheney forgot to put explosives inside of tower seven, where
a lot of the secret materials by the Carr's Pentagon and the Carr's United States government
was holding.
Pay close attention.
this is what is known as game theory. Okay, game theory. Very good. Let's get back to
the Dr. Jung lecture now.
The problem with this defense is that he frequently makes predictions and frames them as tests
to his theory for validity. Some of these predictions aren't falsifiable, which he
never says, but some of them absolutely are, and he sees the results of those predictions
as a means of adjusting the theoretical framework.
This isn't just entertainment.
He's trying to present a working model of the world to his students that supposedly
responds to new information.
And as we'll see later in this video, Zhang is perfectly happy to share his ideas outside
of the classroom as serious geopolitical analysis.
If he thinks this is all entertainment, he shouldn't be presenting his understanding
of the world as something to be taken seriously.
later lecture when Jiang is talking about the factors that help him form his lecture,
there are of course three of them, he lists them out and debate and doubt.
I was still copying it. Okay. Well, you should have taken notes faster.
You should have taken notes faster than you did. And next time, you should remember that. Okay.
Okay. However, if you would like to find the lectures, you don't even need to wash the
vods. You can just rewind as long as you subscribe to the Piker Broadcasting Service. What is
this? Just saw that Jose asked in the description for consumers to wait a week to watch his
video to wash clothes. We've had the link pinned, but definitely should tell people to go wash,
like and subscribe. Yes. Listen. Okay. Piker Broadcasting Service, PBS. Okay. Important.
Pay attention. PBS. Piker Broadcasting Service, also known as the People's Broadcasting Service.
People's Broadcasting Service. Okay? But also, Piker Broadcasting Service. Now, you can
subscribe to the Piker's Broadcasting Service, to Piker Broadcasting Service, or the People's
Broadcasting Service. Okay. To support independent media. But also, okay, you can subscribe for
$6 or you can do that for free. Now, how can you do that for free with an Amazon Prime
subscription? If you have an Amazon Prime subscription or a loved one has an Amazon Prime
subscription. Okay. Okay. You can take that Amazon Prime and convert it. Okay. Convert
it to a Twitch Prime. Okay. And then you can have one free Prime subscription a month
that you can use on your favorite browser. Hopefully it's the only one with a real PhD
or a doctorate rather in jihad, as it says right here, chief of bigotry.
Dr.
Jihad, chief of bigotry, pikerbrock has the service.
You definitely have the, the doctor handwriting down.
That's it.
why would I do that? Three reasons. This is game theory. This is game theory. Three reasons.
Number one, you can rewind, okay?
You can rewind.
That's number one.
Number two, you can send me links.
Very important.
Three, you can use emotes.
Okay, emotes, emotes all around the platform, okay?
There you go.
Just tune in, why aren't you doing this like we have CTE?
I don't know, I'm really enjoying this little bit
that I'm doing as Professor John.
You start all your letters in a different place than I do. I don't even I haven't written I haven't handwritten anything in so long
Please like and comment on the video subscribe to Jose. Yes, and also
To the people who are to the Hassanabeghubs industrial complex do not
Do not take my reactions of this video and upload it
Words cannot describe how devastated I am to learn the Hassan writes like a boy
I'm trying to write fast. Okay here you want me to write nice
Here
You want me to write normal and nice on a board it's like tough to write on a board is different
Okay, okay hold on I didn't realize that the thing sticks, okay
I still wasn't that good. That looks worse. Man, shut up. It's hard to write on a board.
Have you guys are, have you guys written on a board before?
It's tough.
I'll get better.
I'll get better.
I'll get better.
Look, here, let's do cursive.
I forgot how to write cursive.
I forgot how to write cursive. Oh my god.
Nick Shirley handwriting. Stop. How do you forget that?
that? I don't know. It's been so long.
As good as a third grader.
Entirement of two countries education systems.
Okay.
I realized I haven't held a pen in like eight years. Yeah, me either.
Okay. Okay.
Also, Kai is back, but the third one he mentions is troubling.
Speculating without evidence sounds like a terrible piece of advice, especially coming
from a teacher.
While a healthy imagination can be fun, it's particularly unhelpful when speaking on subjects
that someone doesn't have a deep knowledge of.
Zhang would be perfectly within his right to be making these imaginative leaps if we could
trust him to have a good grasp on the subjects he's discussing, that is if he was making
educated guesses.
But as we'll see in the next section, his confidence hides a lot of ignorance.
It's tough to catalog all the things Zhang gets wrong, in part because he speaks on so
many different things and often explains them with vague terms.
There are statements he makes that can very much be fact-checked, and when you do, you
start to find mistakes that reveal how little he really knows about the subjects he discusses.
A great example of just how badly he gets things wrong can be found in one of his earlier
lectures in the Secret History series.
For some context, he's trying to explain the limitations of science, and he hones in on
specific concepts.
And if-
Okay, he's handwriting his dog shit too, though.
Of course, he's got three of them.
I bet you none of Professor Jung's acolytes ever ever criticizes handwriting by the way
Okay, okay
Wait, is this a real
Oh my god, oh, this is real
Oh my God, I'm listening to my heartbeat.
I didn't even realize.
What the fuck?
Wait, let me put it on the microphone.
Maybe you guys can hear my heartbeat.
No, it's not working.
It's not.
ain't how it works. You'd have it on backwards. Wait, what do you mean? I can't believe this
is a real. What is it called? What is this thing called a stethoscope? What is this thing
called? I don't know what it's called. Stethoscope, yeah. That's the brand I'm using in nursing school.
Litman Quality.
Anyway, this is cool, though. You got put it on your neck like this. That's how that's
how everybody knows you mean business. Okay, bang evolution and how memories are formed.
This is all that science-
Is all your stat points in politics?
Yes.
This knows.
I mean, this is pretty simple,
but this is what science tells us about,
where we came from, who we are, where we're going.
He then tries to point out problems
with all three of these ideas.
He seems to think the concept of dark energy
disproves the Big Bang theory.
It's cheating, okay?
So let me give you an example.
Let's just say you take a math test
and the teacher asks you 1987 plus 25
And your answer is 20, okay?
That's obviously wrong, right?
So your teacher says, this is wrong.
And then you say, oh, I know how to fix this,
plus dark energy, problem solved.
To use his math example, if someone wrote
1987 plus 25 equals 20 plus dark energy,
where dark energy is an unknown variable X,
that would still be mathematically correct.
Even if you got a bad mark on a test
because your teacher doesn't like you giving such a cute answer.
Jung does absolutely no work to reckon with the evidence that supports the Big Bang Theory
because that would require a little bit of effort to understand cause.
I'm a little confused.
Like, is he just stupid?
Like what is that?
Is that what it is?
Like he's just kind of like dumb but confident.
Is that what we're watching right now?
Homology.
Instead he uses his own ignorance to frame the concept of dark energy as cheating that
disproves the Big Bang Theory.
His commentary on evolution is similarly uninformed.
He believes it's true for other animals but not for human beings.
What?
He's, he's a, oh my god, he doesn't believe in the, in the, oh my god, he doesn't believe
in evolution.
Oh my god.
Oh, that's my fucking goat. Oh, he's so sick. He's so sick. I can't believe you all ever
doubted him. China's going to keep this guy out. Yeah, it's really funny. If he actually
had any, does he even do any videos on Chinese social media? Because I feel like if he did,
they would probably do something about it.
Now scientists will tell you is,
well before there were different species,
the Neanderthal, the Chromagnon,
and then gradually homocipians took them over.
And that's, and you can believe that,
but it's problematic because according to evolution,
there should be many, many different types of humans, okay?
Maybe some with six fingers, some with three eyes.
I don't know where this is coming from, how many other mammal species are walking around
where each member has a different number of eyes.
He also makes other small mistakes like attributing the term survival of the fittest to Charles
Darwin when it was actually coined by Herbert Spencer, but generally speaking he doesn't
seem to have a good grasp of evolution either.
Later on, when he starts getting into the subject of psychology, he tries to explain
how we contextualize our experiences within our minds.
He uses the terms world view and personality interchangeably, which is already problematic,
but it gives him the opening to say he believes that without a world view, our minds would
not be able to handle all the sensory information around us.
If your brain were to absorb all the experiences, your brain would explode because there's too
much information to process.
Therefore, your world view processes different experiences.
It differentiates between experiences that are important and experiences that are not
important.
And experiments that are important, of course,
goes into your long-term memory.
This isn't really true.
Not having a worldview doesn't mean your mind
is incapable of sifting through information it receives.
It only means that you haven't developed
more sophisticated understanding of the context you live in,
which is what makes this next point especially ridiculous.
In theory, babies should not have a worldview.
They should not have a personality.
But if that's the case, then how do they process memories?
How do they know what memories are stored,
what memory is not to store. Where does the personality come from?
Elephants. Famous animal with a tremendous worldview. That's what they always say about
elephants. An animal with incredible memory, long term memory capabilities. Clearly it's
because of their capabilities of having like North Korea elephants have a bright future.
Why is it embedded in us from the Chinese parents that send their children to this school where
he's giving these lectures to their students in front of them? Okay, do they have any idea what
What the fuck this guy's talking about?
Very first day.
Are babies born with personalities?
They appear remarkably close-lipped about it, so perhaps there's a dark secret they're hiding from us.
Or perhaps, much like language, being able to sit up without falling over and how to feed themselves.
No, the room is not empty. No, he has students, bro. He's literally doing this guy's the next per-empty.
40.
Girls, children gradually acquire the many things that make them who they are as they
become older.
There's actually a whole field that studies that called developmental psychology.
When it comes to personality and infants, the closest measure we have is to look at
their temperament, which is not the same as a worldview by the way, just a general way
to describe the traits of some infants compared to others.
Babies appear perfectly capable of perceiving the world without needing to contextualize
everything through a worldview.
So Jiang's objection, again, doesn't reflect the science he's trying to debunk.
All of these misunderstandings reveal a startling lack of scientific knowledge for someone lecturing
on the subject, particularly if the point he's trying to make is the limitations of
these sciences.
So, it's not a surprise that he eventually ends up here.
If you look at every major scientific discovery, it all came from the person in a dream or
when he was or it sort of popped into that person's head.
He applies this to himself and how he writes.
What am I going to do if I have no ideas?
I can't write anymore.
What happens is the next day I get up and I have new ideas.
And I write it back and I write it down again, OK?
So it's not like I'm degenerating these ideas.
It's more like I'm receiving these ideas.
And that's how he teaches, too.
What?
For context, he's teaching private high school students.
This shit does not fly in Chinese public schools. I thought China cracked down on fucking private schools
How did they let this one fly dude? I?
Don't understand it
China's doing reverse class warfare where if you're if your child is dumb enough to not be able to get to the best public school
He's stuck going to the best private school, and this is your teacher in the best private school
They're doing downward social mobility for for the upper crust of Chinese society
Accessing a higher force, and I'm receiving this information that I can then
Articulate to you in class because he believes
It's coming up with ideas that you might figure out.
No scientist in the history of humanity has ever come up with a great idea using a scientific method.
I guarantee you, they've all came up with a great idea through their imagination, through their intuition.
What?
What the fuck? That's incredible.
He guaranteed it. You can't deny it. He guaranteed it.
He fucking guaranteed it.
Question.
By channeling the divide.
What started off as a lecture about science and its limitations, all coming from someone
who clearly doesn't understand the parts of science he's chosen to talk about, has devolved
into a complete mess where he's claiming that great ideas and discoveries are channeling
some kind of spiritual dimension, and that this spiritual dimension reflects an even
bigger theory of how the world really works as secret societies manipulate events to press
their own occult beliefs onto all of us.
The people in charge, the secret societies-
I just, I feel like his worldview is also all over the place.
Like there's no way that he believes all this, right?
I can't comprehend a guy who has all of these complex thoughts in his mind at the same time.
societies, they are interested, they must make heaven and make hell into heaven and
heaven into hell.
They must invert the world in order to maintain their power.
You don't know this, but all science, it's not about discovering reality.
It's about reinventing reality in a way that serves power.
That's what science really is.
And how will this all end?
Well, we can only hope that Elon Musk will save us.
So there are all these different failsafe systems in there, in here, to make sure that
hell can never triumph.
And that's why LLMUS wants us to go to Mars, okay?
Even though God and Satan are just projections of our imagination, they do help us understand
the world better.
So heaven and hell are metaphors and projections of our imagination, but somehow they help
us understand the world better because of the existence of these secret societies who
Apparently believe all of this you probably notice I spent very little time trying to debunk these last few claims
Yeah, because you can't because you can't okay. Yeah, I'm sorry. You're not professor Jose
Okay, and you know who you certainly aren't professor jihad. I mean professor johan
fuck
Oh man, I'm having so much fun on this stupid ass day.
Because there's nothing of substance there, it's all an imaginary hypothetical asserted
without any real evidence all predicated on a man's inability to understand science.
Jiang's constructed vision of reality has no basis in the one we seem to exist in.
He did something similar in another Secret History video where he speculated that ISIS
was created by the United States using brainwashing interrogation methods.
Okay, he had, again, classic, classic Professor Jung had me in the first half and then the
second half is unbelievable.
Okay?
ISIS was created by the United States.
Okay.
With mind control laser beams.
No.
What the fuck are you saying?
were identical to ones used by ancient Egyptian priests on their leaders in special ceremonies
thousands of years ago. Here's how he tries to connect those two stories.
ISIS is an Islamic State. ISIS is the name of what? The Egyptian goddess, who saved Osiris,
right? And who fathered Horace. You think it's a coincidence? Maybe not.
Yes, it's that the acronym of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, ISIS, and the name
of the Egyptian goddess Isis sound the same. That doesn't really make sense because Isis,
the terrorist group, don't use the English language and speak Arabic and call themselves
a name I'm putting on screen because there's no way I can pronounce it. The acronym for
their name in Arabic is Daesh, not Isis. He also doesn't engage in any of the hard-
What the fuck? Wait. He literally, the cool incident is maybe not.
Oh my god, that's unbelievable. This guy's awesome. I'm convinced he's baiting leftists with these titles.
He's a misaudition. I'm calling it bro. This guy's fucking awesome.
Hard work of linking specific torture victims of the US government.
I'm just thinking about Chinese students still in my mind.
In my mind, I'm thinking about Chinese students listening to this guy to learn English or
I can't tell if he's an English teacher or if he's a teacher of Western philosophy, but he's not teaching either to these children
Okay, these fucking kids are going to this private school and coming out
less knowledgeable than they went in
It's awesome to the creation of ISIS something that would be doable since the names of these victims are documented
Also, the existence of torture is not the same as brainwashing.
You would need to provide far more evidence than the presence of psychologists who were
overseeing some of the torture.
The other big problem is that story about the priests who were doing brainwashing back
in Egypt.
That one, he made up.
So this is what we're doing in Egypt.
They were doing this.
But again, because we are officially starting the Gay to Lease Journalism course.
Traditionally, we've understood journalism and research
as this method of just collecting information, organizing it,
and then expressing it.
But then along came a man named Dave Lease,
and he transformed journalism.
He transformed the way we understood research.
So we created something called literary journalism, which
idea that journalism can be by itself the literature.
The guidance method is going to teach us how to be created.
He has your handwriting. Chill. I'm one of his students. Guys, it's time to come clean.
The reason why his handwriting and mine are so similar is because I'm actually one of
Professor Zhang's students.
That's why I was in China.
Okay, every moment that I was live streaming in China, I was actually getting lectured
directly by Professor Zhang.
Okay, it's time to come clean.
Eleven years ago, China's super schools.
You don't search this video, the algorithm presents it to you, the Jiang Dynasty conquered
YouTube. Jong has been cooking longer than we thought. Yo, it's my boy Professor Jong. Bro did an age of day in like 11 years.
Bro is stomping all over the YouTube algorithm. They must like him a lot. This man is taking over the YouTube algorithm.
I...
It's actually kind of wild how much Professor Jong is promoted.
Professor Jung thinks Hamas is actually movement, the resistance, the Islamic.
Yeah, it's true. That's what it's Hamas in English is Him-Turt-T-T. Him-Turt-T-T. Yeah.
or no, not him, sorry, movement, the resistance, the Islamic, which would be, I know, I know,
it's, Harekat al-Mukawama al-Islamia, right? Harekat al-Mukawama al-Islamia, which is,
Yeah, the Islamic resistance movement, which is Hamas, which in English would be, I guess,
the Islamic resistance movement, so it would be IRM.
You're silly Turkish accent, but speaking Arabic is adorable.
Okay, what's really important is this is all speculation.
And it's really important for you to doubt and question me because we don't
actually know that this happened.
All the records have been lost to us.
And obviously, this would be the greatest state secret of Egypt.
But from my perspective, it makes sense.
With the hell cares if it makes sense to this guy?
If he can't provide evidence of any of this having happened, how is that any better than
pretending any other story someone else imagined is real?
He similarly seems to have no clue what he's talking about on other subjects.
Here's his description of how capitalists created communism to destroy socialism.
In many ways, communism is a creation.
Oh, look at this. Look at this.
Son, can you check my log? I literally subbed again just to talk to you. Hasan, please check my logs at Begabu. Hasan, check my log.
Please check log.
My son used to be a huge fan of following you for a long time over social media. Never miss you.
I'm sorry. I must say this because I respect that you won't sman you're always telling people not to be racist instead when it comes to the UAE.
You say we're dogs, Zionists, etc. Just for your info, you have no idea what it's like to see your whole family here.
bombs being interfered above us every single day with no fucking help until we take it.
What?
Take of it our own with our airspace?
The US didn't help?
The hate you spread.
Please check my log.
Brother, you are not your government.
United Arab Emirates on the other hand as a government is asscheeks so is the
Saudi government what do you want me to what do you want me to do act like it's
a it's a redeemable it's not
Now, your fault of capitalism as a weapon destroy capitalism's major enemies, capitalist
hate democracy.
Why do they hate democracy?
Okay, true.
Because if people have power, the workers have power.
They would always think that.
Base, base, base, base, he's cooking.
Just wait, though.
he's going to flip it around and vote to redistribute wealth, right? To make the rich pay more taxes.
We call this socialism. After once again hedging that none of this may be true,
he then spins this wild story of how Karl Marx was a tool. Yeah, the American government is
perfect though. Everything's going great here in America. No problems at all. How are you?
Yeah, I famously always say the American government is doing great.
If there's one thing I'm notoriously known for, it's constantly talking about how great
America's government is.
Full of the English elites want to pit the workers against the bourgeoisie through a
messy propaganda campaign that also kicked off anti-Semitism.
He then provides an example of what he calls evidence that communists were operated in
in a secret society, one that was intentionally made discoverable because they were a psi
op that used anti-Semitism to vilify itself because it was advancing the interests of
capitalists.
What?
We admit we are a natural conspiracy, we're a secret society, this is a secret document
that we read amongst ourselves, but it's also possible for you to steal and show that
Yes, there is this secret society, natural conspiracy, of Jews who are trying to destroy the world.
If this sounds ridiculously convoluted, that's because it is.
This secret document being shown is the Communist Manifesto, and Yang is presenting the idea of international solidarity as some kind of poorly hidden conspiracy.
Except this book was widely published and available to read all over the place.
At no point was this a conspiracy. It wasn't poorly hidden, it just exists.
The anti-Semitic conspiracy theories were put onto it because it turns out creating anti-Semitic conspiracy theories is a long-standing tradition in Europe going back centuries.
A more modern example would be how political parties often vilify immigrants to disguise their own economic agenda that's more centered around providing tax cuts for the wealthy rather than providing services for people who actually need them.
Wait, he's saying the communists were the anti-Semitic ones?
Wait, what? I'm so confused. Is he what? Or is he saying that like anti-Semites were anti-communists?
He just said something so insane that it genuinely gave me a stroke, I think.
It's whatever you wanted to be, my friend.
Communists were secretly capitalists.
It's the classic, what was it, the Rothschilds and British bankers funded the socialists, the communists.
But they were also doing it to do anti-Semitism?
Someone say Carl Markets?
John was saying, communists were being anti-Semites on purpose to discredit communism and socials
because communists were a PSYOP created by capitalists.
Yeah, but he's Asian, I believe, I'm on pause.
But what I don't understand is the cultural revolution missed one.
What is this?
A Sompiger recreates a childhood.
Oh come on dude.
So we have a model of history that explains all of the events Zhang finds mysterious that
work just fine without entertaining this secret society hypothesis that Jiang finds so compelling.
The fact that history seems impossible to Jiang is hardly grounds for his speculation.
But as you might be able to tell, we're starting to get into some dicey territory here, and
it certainly isn't the only time we see troubling theories popping up from the ideas Jiang wants
his audience to consider. Here's an example of him supposedly reading a map that measures
academic performance.
Muslims don't do well on the PISA and that's why there's great fear that its other countries
will fall behind economically.
While he briefly mentions the predominantly Christian, Central and South America, which
are also in red, he only brings up religion when he's talking about Muslim-majority countries
and without any evidence asserts that their religion explains their poor performance on
this academic test.
This is characteristic of how Jiang talks about Muslim people in general, such as when he
hypothesized that Iranians were all ready to start fighting a jihad.
According to what I've learned from his background, he spent a brief time teaching in Afghanistan,
but somehow his understanding of Muslim people seems to be limited to stereotypes that sound
like generic fearmongering that followed September 11th.
This video highlighting education to spare.
Okay, this guy has to be a fucking agent, right?
Wow, he has lived such a rich life.
you for taking the time and reading what I wrote. I appreciate it. Truly just go up.
I appreciate it, man. Is this another one of those like insane moments where the CIA
releases a PSYOP and it ends up harming Americans? It reminds me of how they did vaccine hesitancy
campaigns in the Philippines. But I guess they'd never accounted for all the vaccine hesitancy
that would take shape in the United States of America. They were like, Hey, we sent them
to Afghanistan. I mean, he's too young to have literally been one of those guys who
was, uh, you know, teaching the Nebraska textbooks that had like bombs on them to the Mujahideen
in Madrasas. But, um, well, another chatter reformed you're on a hot streak. Yeah, I know
I'm been, I'm popping off. I am Professor Jung, please read my log supporting Professor
Jung. So check and yell at me. I can yell at chat. Okay. Langley cooked it with this
guy got to respect it. I just don't even fucking understand what like, what purpose he could
possibly serve. I genuinely think it's a pure happenstance, pure luck. I think it's genuinely
pure luck that he got this, he got like this popular. I don't think this man does anything
with intention. Okay.
I'm not even sure he has a worldview, he doesn't.
Pretty is about immigration.
And he spends some time talking about the discrimination immigrants face.
To be more specific though, he really only talks about the discrimination faced by e-
The fuck are you talking about, chatter? No, I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about Professor Jung, what the fuck?
East Asian men, like him, of the two main types of discrimination he mentions, and I'm genuinely shocked he used two instead of three.
One of them is that there are a limited number of CEO
positions available to East Asian men.
The other form of discrimination is that East Asian men
do poorly on dating apps.
In this section, it's very strange how he fixates
specifically on white women.
A white woman will be attracted to the average white guy,
and she will only be interested in
the highest earning Asian guys.
How he talks about women in general gives off some negative vibes.
It's easy for them to find someone of their status or below, but it's very hard for
each Asian man to actually marry up and improve their status and social economic standing.
Jiang talks about women like their symbols of status, which is a pretty bad way to approach
dating.
And I'd wager treating women like that is going to hurt your chances far more than being
East Asian.
By the way, I want to make it clear that it is true that East Asian men, women and non-binary
people do face discrimination.
It's an unfortunate truth and it should be called out.
The problem here is that Jiang is doing a very poor job of making that case, and it seems
more self-serving than trying to speak for any kind of community.
And he eventually uses his own personal story to go to a much darker place where he explains
that East Asian men are suckers for playing the game.
That is, to be an immigrant who integrates into their new culture, because it allows
white men to marry their best women while other minorities cheat the system.
The most attractive of all Asian women will be married off to white guys, whereas Asian
Asian guys will make their money and then stay at home and play video games all the
time.
Okay?
The game is rigged.
So they-
Okay, he has a lot of passion when he's talking about this, unlike other subjects.
I feel like this hits close to home for him somehow.
I don't know why, but this is the most like angered I've heard him speak.
He's doing r slash a ZN, a ZN identity posting.
I know.
I do.
He, this is a high school teacher.
Okay.
He's got students in that room that are listening to him educate them on Western philosophy.
The only logical strategy according to game theory to this situation is to break the game,
cheat, okay?
And that's what the other minorities are doing.
This racist rant is supposed to be a lesson in game theory, by the way, which supposedly
explains why these other minorities are grouping together and having lots of babies so they
can take over.
He eventually goes back to being bigoted towards Muslims specifically.
In Europe, there's a huge Muslim problem.
Muslims are less likely to integrate. They don't do very well in school, but they will
claim welfare. They will have lots and lots of babies, which is a drain on the economy
of these nations. So trends continue that it is most likely that Muslims will control
you're up in 25 years time.
Yes, it's true. He caught on, dude. This is, this is literally, okay, I'm beginning to
realize something here. I have to be very serious for a moment. Okay. I genuinely think
I think there's only one type of YouTube content that just goes viral all the time and it's
this.
Because what he's talking about is literally like early gamer gay era.
Since the invention of YouTube, the only people that have gotten the algorithmic boost,
not to get all Professor Jong with it, not to get all conspiratorial has been guys that
say this, okay?
It's never stopped being guys that say this.
There are different variants.
There are different generations of content creators that come and go, okay?
But there's only one absolute, and that is if you are saying exactly these words, women
ain't shit, you know, they want to fuck all the hottest guys, they don't want to fuck
you, and also Islam is going to overtake Europe in 25 years, that is algorithm catnip,
okay?
For some weird reason, literally every single top content creator on YouTube has done this.
Okay?
Jordan Peterson, Sam Harris, now Professor Jong, Sargon of Akkad, like all of these
people that have engaged in political commentary and achieved maximum virality have done both
of these things every single time.
Andrew Tate, Tyler Olivera, what the fuck is going on?
Why is that like the thing?
I want to test it out.
I want to do like a video talking about both of these things, you know?
Okay.
For Jiang, I'll do my own list of three here.
Muslim people operating in unison, never adjusting to the culture in their new home, and wanting
to take over is part of the anti-immigrant rhetoric that has been used against every
immigrant group for decades. It's never been true and I don't see what makes Muslim people
uniquely threatening, especially since we're reducing people that can come from entirely
different parts of the world down to their religion. I'd wager someone who immigrates
from Indonesia probably has a very different experience than someone who is immigrating
from Pakistan. This map he's so worried about doesn't just include newly arrived immigrants,
it would include second, third and later generations as well. People who are not only born in Europe,
families that stretch back decades. Do they not get to be European? Or can they never be part of
the only culture they and their family have ever known because of their religion? The reductive
way of looking at the world Jiang frequently uses unsurprisingly leads to conclusions like these
ones, where his own ignorance simplifies diverse populations into easily understood threats,
in this case turning his classroom lecture into a rant about population replacement that wouldn't
be out of place on an episode of Tucker Carlson, where Tucker Carlson frequently cries about white
people being under attack. Unsurprisingly, Jiang's a big fan of his.
Well, thanks so much for inviting me to talk. I'm a huge fan. I've been
allowing your work for a number of years now.
While Jiang predicates some of what he says about immigration on Europeans being racist,
he makes this important point towards the end of the lecture.
Immigration is not natural. You're born into a community. What is natural is for you to want
to help this community grow and develop. You want to contribute to this community. What is not
natural is for you to say, you know what, this community sucks, I'm gonna go find a new community."
Jiang is arguing that racism present in Europe is a response to something unnatural, all while
Jiang does some racism of his own. It's an astu bit of business where someone who was an immigrant
himself seems to have learned the worst lessons of any discrimination he may have experienced.
And there's another moment in one of his lectures that also requires some discussion,
and that's where Jiang denied the Holocaust. This comment is brief, but can be seen in the video
titled, The German Will to Power. We don't actually have any concrete evidence for the Holocaust,
okay? So one piece of evidence from the Holocaust is this speech by Hitler. The context here is
that he's examining an anti-Semitic screed from Hitler and trying to argue that the term Jewish
is a metaphor. It's a Jews who are metaphor for a national,
a legal individual who are conspiring to undermine the vitality in a
strength of the germination. Like everything he discusses in his lectures,
he doesn't linger too long on this. Okay, on this on this segment, I will not be even
jokingly defending Professor John. Okay, that's not happening. That's insane.
point, and it's part of a much larger framework I mentioned earlier about how anti-semitism
was used to mask the real origins of communism, which was apparently the capitalists. I'm not
sure if he means that Hitler saw through this ruse or if we should understand his words in that
context rather than what they literally mean, but to even go down this road.
Saying there is no concrete evidence for the Holocaust is one of the most insane things that
you can say. Again, by the way, feeding back to the theory that I presented previously,
Which is, this is the only type of content that the YouTube algorithm promotes. I don't know why.
I don't know if it's a grand conspiracy, not to get all Professor Chang with it.
I took the robe off at this point, so I'm no longer Dr. Jihad. But it is crazy that he hits
all of the fucking high notes, dude. This is straight up white boy catnip, okay? You put
put information like this in whatever form it takes in front of young white boys and
they will literally give you the world. Okay? It's the same with Fresh and Fit, Andrew Tate,
Professor Chang, Sargon of Accod, Richard Spencer, Nick Fuentes. I don't know what the
fuck it is. You got to be an incel. You got to say Muslims are taking over Europe and
you got to deny the Holocaust or at least like show a little bit of skepticism towards
it and straight up YouTube will be like oh my god step right this way sir you are literally
the goat we will put you at the top of the leaderboard at the top of the directory okay
it's not gonna be so going no I'm saying they come and go but they have their moments right
and there's different eras there's always like a like a different era where there's
a content creator where you're like why the fuck's this guy famous he's a absolute dumb
mass. And then you scratch the surface and you always find the same shit. Okay. You scratch
the surface and you find the same exact policies, the same exact ideologies, same exact principles,
unvarnished white supremacy, hatred of women, and, and Nazism, you know, different variants
of like fascist behavior, fascist ideology. Tyler Hitler, there is another example of
is and I don't understand it at all. Oh, they got clapped already. Put us in some alarming
territory where these Sam Harris hates women. Sorry, my best friend is a lib who is obsessed
with Sam and I need ammo. Yeah, I mean, Sam Harris doesn't deny the Holocaust and I don't
think he hates women that much. I think he's just like basic, basic level. It's not anything
exceptional, but he is unbelievably racist. And for your liberal friend, I mean, your
liberal friend might be a huge Islamophobe because that's like Sam Harris is number one
thing. Maybe he just can't imagine the Nazis would do the Holocaust because it doesn't
fit into game theory? Fuck.
What is this? On the topic of Muslim integration? Oh, I saw this.
He at least integrated Syrian in Bavaria.
It's really funny because the replies are full of people being like,
Fuck this guy still.
This motherfucker is a Syrian refugee, who apparently speaks with an unbelievably thick accent too, and not a Syrian one.
And he went and he bought his own fucking pony and everything, okay?
This is 100% integration, okay? 100% integration, okay? He's a true Bavarian.
Yeah, and the replies are all like fucking AFD adjacent dickheads being like, oh, just fucking bullshit
Disgusting that's not german
I'm German and I can't understand him so he's perfectly integrated into Bavaria, yeah.
It's a joke that Bavaria is not Germany, oh, okay.
Fact hypotheticals have Jiang engaging in some kind of denialism that divorces us from history
as we understand it.
And instead the fantasy world he's creating, this particular lecture isn't a part of his
game theory series but rather one titled, Civilization Where He Provides, Other Absurd
alternative readings of history, such as the Carthaginian Hannibal not actually existing.
Hannibal Barkat denies himself as a person. While incredibly silly,
his commentary on Hitler and the Holocaust can't be so easily laughed at. And if he can upload
new versions of lectures to fix audio issues, I think he can upload new versions of lectures that
supposedly have him accidentally denying the Holocaust. At least according to his audience,
that's the defense I saw most frequently. It seems like that would be a really good thing to fix.
But as we step out of the classroom, maybe we'll get a little more information on what he thinks about this.
A question that kept popping into my head while watching these lectures was,
how is this a class? Although Jiang teaches a course called Western Philosophy,
he only mentions philosophers in passing and instead subjects his students to long discussions
about modern gay geopolitics and his bizarre theories.
What, North Korea is one of the few places where capitalism still exists?
The DPRK under Kim Jong-un has been anything but socialist. What is happening at this point man?
I don't even want to know. I mean this part, this first one is obviously a fucking joke.
I don't even know what the second one is. West Coast neoliberal elitist. Trans-pride
flag. Ukraine flag. Israel flag. Wait, they, they, I assume I've been blocked by this again.
up there. Okay. Yeah.
They got hashtag novel on the fucking.
They got they got hashtag novel on there. That's
you know,
What is this scene? This one? This is the official position of the German Green Party.
Imagine being vegan for ethical reasons and then also pro-Israel.
Yeah, let me tell you something, okay? Let me tell you something.
There truly is every kind of person out there. I mean, yeah, especially Twitter where I think people just like wear their mental illness on their sleeve
Myself included. Let's be real. You know, I got a weird one
The fact that I'm even on
Twitter that's
Indicative of some level of mental illness on world history
Occasionally he'll try to connect Plato or Kant to his lecture, but it's hardly a suitable
amount of material for a real lecture on those subjects.
Jiang's teaching methods are unorthodox, but it seems to fit the vibe of the school he
teaches at, Moonshot Academy.
I can't speak to what the average high school is like in China, but this one seems unique,
with a striking interior design and small class sizes of less than 10 students per teacher.
I don't know what any of these other classes are like, but I hope these kids are getting
a better education than what they're getting in Jung's class. Jung does talk about his
previous experiences in education at other institutions. Notably, he spends one of his
lectures complaining about how he was fired from his previous teaching job.
The word that everyone used to describe me was not reformer, not visionary, not idealist,
a dreamer but dictator. Okay. One of the word that they used that was more common was,
I think press on those Professor John so much because the stream is the only live stream
where gaming is just a theory. No, I love Professor John because he gets to teach you
the real theory. Okay. All the hammer and sickle Twitter accounts are right. Okay. I
purposefully I'm trying to defeat all the the revolutionary spirit that people have
By educating you on the professor Jongi in style of theory
Does he even teach English I don't know what he's teaching I still I know that the technically
They're saying people keep repeating and the school is
Presenting him as a as a teacher of Western philosophy and yet
I have heard zero Western philosophy.
This motherfucker has a Yale education, by the way, an English degree, but still.
Like, this is a Yale educated guy.
How the fuck did this happen?
It's an asshole.
I guess technically Holocaust denial definitely does fit in Western philosophy.
So, he's just teaching, his entire thing is basically teaching his students that Western
philosophy is insane, okay?
Just be an insane woman hating racist Holocaust denier and you basically understand damn near
entirety of Western philosophy.
This is not to this is not to teach the students anything new. It's just it's a it's a warning more so
He's basically saying don't learn this okay
There's got to complete asshole
I'm not sure talking about how you lost your last job is suitable for a lecture
but eventually turns this personal anecdote into a story about how everyone involved with education
is lazy and not operating on the deep love of brightening young minds like he is.
What? Yeah, after every lesson he literally says, this is why you're not supposed to go to America,
where I got a college degree in one of the best institutes of higher learning at Yale University.
this is why this is why you need to stay in China okay they they will fuck your
ass up like they scrambled my brains listening to his lecture on not
experience getting fired the big takeaway I got was that it sounded like
his experimental curriculum design had very tough grading which annoyed some
people his current class doesn't have grades though it doesn't have tests
either students either pass or fail.
How he assesses their learning is never made clear
since most of his classes are typically him lecturing
with the odd question every now and again.
Before the schools break for midterms,
Jiang's class featured a midterm he designed
where he answered questions from the intro.
All right, so in this tweet,
Mr. Bozak said that, listen.
He does eventually give his students
the chance to ask questions,
though they usually just create opportunities
for him to further exposit his bizarre ideas.
In this clip he's responding to a question about his theory that Israel is going to let Tel Aviv get destroyed
so the more secular Israelis will die, leaving the more religious ones in charge.
That's not a far shot!
What the fuck?
Dude, no!
Wait!
Dude, this guy's out of his fucking mind!
Dude, oh my god, I need to be in his class so bad
Okay, next time I go to China. I am going to try to be in his club
I'm gonna try to figure out a way where I can sit through one of his lessons. Oh
my god
He's awesome. We build an economy in a city. It's not hot. Okay. What is hard though is to develop a spiritual
cohesion of a people to make them believe in something so that they're willing to die for it, okay?
That's what matters, right? They're throwing a city you can rebuild in five years time
It's not that hard just how the Chinese to do it. Well, this guy's really stretching
The the boundaries of the firewall, okay?
Like how what how is the Chinese dude the Chinese government?
Everyone talks about how the Chinese government is so repressive and so fucking and there's truth to it, right?
But goddamn they're just letting this guy do whatever the fuck he wants clearly. They don't give a shit about a lot of things
Okay
Like what are you talking about?
The Chinese government is watching these and falling for it. Yeah
They're changing. Yeah, they're they're they're writing about the professor John lectures on the what's that?
What's that website where they write stuff for the party like new notes?
He's going to be mentioned in the annual, Xi Jinping's annual statement, like his nation address.
Okay?
The Qixi, right, yeah.
Treat letting an entire city be wiped out so one group can consolidate their power is ridiculous.
But that was only before I considered that they could just ask China to rebuild a city in five years.
I'm sure it's just that easy.
Jiang cares less about evidence or mathematical models in the world, but...
They're putting this in the CPC Central Committee by monthly.
Professor Zhang has a brilliant new thesis that we will be discussing.
Professor Zhang invited to deliver a direct lecture to the Standing Committee.
Maybe they see the benefit of him rotting American brains and they let him cook.
search his name. I'm not going to search Professor John. It's going to be another Professor
John that comes up that he uses intuition. I know it's game theory. I know I'm not supposed
to use math, but but I'll be constrained by math. Okay. So I use a lot of intuition.
I use a lot of doubt. He teaches in Canada, not China. Wait, no, I'm pretty sure he teaches.
No, no, he teaches in Beijing. No, he lives in China, and these are lectures that he's
giving to real students. No, no, no, he is literally, he is literally in China. I'm pretty
I'm pretty sure he's in China and these lessons are in a Beijing private school in China.
He does not put any of those videos on Chinese social media, by the way, because I think
he would get E-Third instantly, like that's the funniest thing.
Like if you posted even a fraction of these lectures on BDBD or some shit, he would definitely
immediately account gone, okay?
Which is really funny.
So I mean, I know that the, the, the Chinese government doesn't really give a shit about
like uploads to the Western internet.
Like they don't really care that much.
But what I can't comprehend is how he is allowed to teach whatever the fuck he's teaching
in a moonshot academy in a Chinese private school.
What the fuck?
Okay I'm skipping this. Civilization is an race between education and catastrophe. Moosh
Shot Academy has committed to building global learning community as ground and competency
based liberal arts education and characterized by real world projects that embrace cutting
edge technology. Our mission is to cultivate fulfilled individuals and active confessions
that support the continuation of prosperity in human civilization.
15 learners passionate about tech entrepreneurship, offering up to full
scholarships of four years, a hackathon exclusively for middle school learners,
the ISM project, discipline, subject, visual arts, family memoirs, startup game studio experience.
The president of the school doesn't live in China. Why does the Chinese government allow this to
to happen. That's what I don't understand. Yeah, see, it's in Beijing. I heard I missed
the cushy talk, run that back too late. He moved back to China after this. Last week,
I was detained at a Toronto Public School because the staff suspected me of child abuse.
Here I explain what happened and why I plan to file a lawsuit.
Wait, what?
Bro.
What?
What?
Have people just not looked into this guy's background at all?
All your haters are like this. Why? He's not a hater. First of all, he's a lover. So remember that.
I mean, he's, he's agnostic. Okay. This is not, Professor Jung is not a designated Hassanabi enemy.
Okay. Let's just, yeah. This is the breaking points in story and Crystal, no, no, I talked to them
after this because I wanted to get his contact information and I wanted to have him on the stream.
Which I still do by the way, for the record. But
But what I don't understand is what this guy is done, what he's capable of doing, he crashed
out on his videos for it.
Wait.
No, I know he uses VPN.
We watched that interview.
I've told you guys this already if you're in China and you're not on Chinese internet
and you're on Western internet you can do whatever the fuck you want.
That's not confusing to me.
Okay.
What's confusing to me is how he actually teaches Chinese students in Beijing in English
And he says these things in his lectures.
How do you get on the West Internet?
What do you mean?
I literally live streamed from China.
I live streamed my entire trip in China from China.
What is this?
Is this a bidi-bidi?
Did you find a bidi-bidi video, Professor Zhang?
Today, I want to discuss how the global economy will collapse.
Collapsed global economy.
Wait, he's popping on fucking BDBD2?
Isn't this one of the international schools?
Oh my god.
And you're not a professor, I know it's your YouTube moniker, but you're a high school
too.
They China-fied this, by the way, that's so funny.
They made this...
You're a middle...
Professor Zhang's identity was exposed to a host question on the spot.
You're a middle school teacher.
Why do you call yourself a professor?
Are you being controlled by Dongda University?
Oh god, this is a little bit of Chinese anti-Indian racism there.
I saw this guy live in the UK. He has that inexplicable Indian self-confidence
It's fucked up
Okay, I use a lot debate his class according to him is meant to spark creativity and encourage his students to use their own
Intuition the biggest problem I see with this is that his students never actually get to do any of that in this class
at least not in the lectures he's uploaded.
Students should have the opportunity to create their own theories or ideas or maybe experiment with frameworks that let them challenge themselves.
This class is more about challenging Zhang to see if he can keep all the balls he's juggling in the air,
deflecting the challenges he gets from his students.
There's also the additional danger of his students and audience ignoring the game of creating hypotheticals while taking his statements about the real world and its history at face value.
If Jiang wants to demonstrate the intersection between game theory and politics,
he could simply use a fictional place like Westeros from Game of Thrones.
It doesn't.
So there's no danger of anyone taking what he says about the real world seriously.
But by grounding his speculation in the real world and mixing it in with his own misunderstandings,
it could only serve to confuse the audience.
Something that becomes apparent when you look away from the lecture videos
and the common sections underneath them,
filled with people who seem to think they're learning about the world.
Jiang does himself no favors when he steps out of his...
for sure. I thought this was a college lecture. Can't believe this is high school. Can't believe
I'm learning this stuff for free. Yeah, now I do believe the Holocaust, that there is no
concrete evidence for it. And also, women are constantly trying to fuck the hottest guys.
And we should deny them, we should deny them the free, the capacity to make choices so we don't
fall like the Roman Empire. This is incredible.
Classroom and starts presenting the ridiculous fantasies he's cooked up to a wider audience,
something he's doing more of as he started making the rounds in the podcast circuit.
In a previous video of mine about Minnesota and the lies spread about that state by Nick Shirley,
I paid special attention to the podcast environment that let such a clueless kid like
Kim seemed far more credible, treating his nonsense as something to be taken seriously.
Jang is at a similar experience as his public profile has risen, often brought on to discuss
his theories about the...
Okay, Professor Jang does have much better skills in narration.
He is a...
I mean, it's not really saying much, but like a third grader probably can speak better and
more confidently than Nick Shirley, but he's still...
We know he's literate.
We know he went to college.
He's capable of complex thoughts, maybe perhaps too complex at times.
Nick Shirley is not capable of any of those things.
Paul does an absent-minded host nods along.
Here's a quick taste of a prediction from a podcast with a...
anything I I can probably safely assume Nick Shirley might have been a Professor
John student at Moonshot Academy.
This is what happens when you get lectured by Professor John.
My name is Cyrus Jensen. I've never heard of this was recorded a few months back.
If you just look at history, I just look at the history of humanity from a macro perspective
Ice ages are a common thing, so I think that we are looking, we're moving towards an ice age.
With record heat temperatures for more than two decades now, we're actually heading in the
opposite direction, at least according to climate scientists who, I suspect, have looked into this
far more than Chiang Khaz. Here's another example of him saying something ridiculous in his interview
with Tucker Carlson. You'd be called a racist, and that's the worst thing they call, right?
I mean like you've been up you've been up in called pedophile. Yeah pedophiles are more right now than then dependent racists
I have no
He's holding it so hard. He's like, what are you saying man?
Idea. Yeah pedophiles are more right now than then dependent racists. I have no idea
Yo, he's dude professor John man. What a fucking legend dude. He's crazy. I
Feel like he just things just come into his mind. He's not lying when he says like
The the scientific method is bullshit. Obviously everyone just you know
Invents their own reality and then says whatever comes to their mind immediately
Yeah, it's true for Professor John. Okay. He doesn't hold anything back. He just, he just says whatever, whatever comes up. No filter.
Oh, that's awesome.
Now what he's trying to say here aside from playing along with Tucker Carlson to pretend like being called a racist is the worst thing that can happen to you when people like Tucker Carlson have made a pretty good living by being a professional racist.
During this interview, Jang also said-
Aha!
But how much more money could he make if he was a professional pedophile?
Got you there, Jose! No way, Jose!
Yeah, bet he'd make even more money!
Disproving your point immediately.
Ha ha ha ha ha.
Case in point, Jeffrey Epstein.
That's right.
That's right.
You don't think.
Those things that are so clearly and obviously not true.
These elite universities, Yale, Harvard,
they are the most critical of Western civilization.
They don't teach Homer and Don Timberlake.
Jung has a degree in English.
He has a degree in English from Yale!
He knows they teach that!
That's so stupid!
You definitely know that they taught you that!
Yes, they do!
Literature from Yale where he learned about all these figures.
And I did a quick check and there are still several courses teaching Homer, Dante, and Plato at Yale.
These interviews do strip-bear the defense that his ideas are meant to be fun hypotheticals,
not to be taken too seriously, and he's perfectly happy to repeat them on these podcasts.
like the existence of secret societies.
There will be a world war, the final war, and possibly a nuclear war,
but who God and my God is is up for debate.
Wow, it's a bit of a wonder where he gets this stuff from,
though considering his media diet, it's not surprising that
watching Tucker Carlson and Jimmy Dore contributes to someone being disconfused about the world.
I think you're the best-
Oh, go talk, all my goats.
On TV right now, even though you're not actually on TV, and actually you're not out there in
When Jung sits down with Jimmy Dore, things start to get really unhinged, like when he
calls the mass shooting on Bondi Beach that targeted Jewish people a false flag.
There are a lot of false flags, right?
So for example, the most blatant example is...
I spoke too soon.
I shouldn't have said don't talk right before this.
That was a joke for the record.
You will see more examples of false flags against Jews in order to scare the Jewish
guys to return to Jerusalem.
This interview also reveals how he got turned on to some of the more esoteric beliefs in
made an appearance on Metzger's podcast as well. There was more discussion about how the Bondi
beat shooting was some kind of secret plot, though he does think that the deaths were real at least.
It does get significantly weirder the deeper they get into the show.
You look at World War II, okay? How much of World War II that we've been taught in school,
do you think actually happened during World War II? You know, like...
Yeah.
Like, are there certain World War II? Do you think that's actually what happened? I don't know.
This certainly makes me think his earlier comment about the Holocaust wasn't Jang Miss Speaking.
But he doesn't expand on things in this interview either.
It's yet another part of his pattern of believing history that's not just comically wrong,
but also conspiratorial in a way that reflects some really ugly beliefs.
It was genuinely a surprise to me to find out that Jiang is not a new addition to the YouTube space
from an ideological perspective,
but rather he's a product of the sewage system of reactionary political commentary channels.
What seemed like Jiang's original bullshit is just recycled crap from someone else's rear end.
The interview Jiang is probably most famous for is the one he had on breaking points, which has racked up 9 million views.
This interview is particularly harmful because it's over 10 minutes of Jiang seeming almost respectable when he drops this at the very end.
Yeah, this is the, this is, I had a conversation with them, they were like shocked by this, okay?
They literally were like, this was, the interview was like actually pretty insightful.
Up until the very last moment where it just turned into something utterly insane.
He starts with an answer about the Epstein files revealing elites operating in secret,
but then he makes a huge jump to assume that it's not just sex crimes they're doing.
And the Illumati are composed of three major groups, okay?
You have the Jesuits who control the Vatican, you have the sub-team Frankis who, which control
the modern system Israel today, and you have the Freemasons, which control the national
security apparatus of the United States. And they believe that ishreal, this one mill ease,
is key to the end times. While Epsom files obviously revealed lots of criminal activity,
it was a conspiracy to commit sex crimes, not a conspiracy to bring about the end times.
This is where the interview should have started. Or at the very least, they should have taken
some time to ask what the hell he was talking about. Platforming is a complicated subject,
And if he was a smaller creator, I think providing people like him a platform does more harm than good because he's likely to reach an audience regardless of how he's presented.
However, the popularity Jang already has puts him in a category where the benefit of this appearance isn't so one-sided.
But if someone like this is going to be on your show, they need to be more aggressively questioned.
Mediason did a better job confronting Jang and some of his more outlandish claims, even if he didn't go as far as I might have liked.
I've blown up all across the internet and I don't think it's organic, but but so I wonder if there are
Some governments or some entities that believe that my message should be amplified
um
This was so funny. I love this because he literally just like I don't know maybe
He's literally just like, I don't know
Yeah, maybe some some governments are amplifying my message. Who knows I make stuff up all the time like he's so
It's so funny because he's like so sincere about being a charlatan at which point you're like
Well, where can we go in this conversation?
If you're if you're just revealing that you don't know what you're talking about and you make stuff up all the time
And you even admit that you might be a psyop for a government
And like I said
The way he carries himself from the way he conducts himself in this interview is so fascinating
fascinating because he has this weird like naive confidence where he's just like, I don't
know what I'm talking about. It's awesome. People love it. People love it. Maybe I'm
a plant. Who knows? Think about that a lot.
It is possible. I'm a useful idiot.
I've never heard this man's cadence change except when he was talking about interracial
religions.
Yes, that's also true.
He got unbelievably bent out of shape when he was talking about, you know, Asian women,
fucking white boys.
He did not like that at all.
Strange thing to say, even though I'm critical of him, I don't doubt the ability of the algorithm
to push downsides without being manipulated by an Asian state.
I would like to see if he has some kind of evidence for his suspicion that he's being
artificially boosted, but he's not really a man of facts and doesn't provide any.
I think that yeah, this is the this is the other side of the story, which is what the fuck
This is the other side of the story where you can't really
um
You can't really take him seriously, but everyone does
But he doesn't take himself seriously
So it's like you can't really conduct a a thorough debate with a guy who just says I make stuff up
Like, how are you supposed to have a conversation with a guy who literally goes, yeah, I make
stuff up.
It's awesome, actually.
I don't know why people take me seriously.
Yeah.
I think it's good to make stuff up.
You should do it, too.
You know, what are you, okay, I guess that's it, you know, end the debate at that point.
What are we supposed to fucking debate?
is that it focuses too much on facts, too much on rigor,
and then on imagination.
Too much on facts, do you hear yourself?
The last interview I want to briefly mention is...
Yeah, he literally does stand ten toes down on that, where he's like,
yeah, I make stuff up.
I think people should stop relying on facts as much.
When Zhang went on Patrick Bethevitz podcast where he had a few wacky takes,
like that COVID-19 was an American bioweapon.
So I believe that this was an American bioweapon.
It's funded by 244G.
PBD, following the pattern of most of these hosts, doesn't seriously challenge him on any of these ridiculous clans.
Okay, well, what's the expectation? You think PBD's gonna do that? He's like, I'm a numbers guy.
Professor Jiang, you're a very smart guy. We're gonna rock it. We're gonna rock it. We're gonna judge you, but do it.
Oh, I do need to push back on a comment Jiang made about his former home.
If I said the certain things that I said in Canada, then it's possible that I get visited by the police.
Don't worry, Jiang. They don't arrest people for having a shitty YouTube channel.
And he isn't the only one living off his channel.
There's currently a big gold rush right now with channels posting clips of all his lectures,
some of them getting tons of views.
In one place there's a creepy AI version of Cheyenne that talks to the audience.
I've not spoken much about AI on this ch-
Bro, this literally looks like the hotel I stayed at in fucking Doha.
That's crazy.
That looks insane.
panel, but if anyone is curious, I am not a fan.
and I think AI videos like these are some of the worst garbage on this website.
I'll give Jiang some credit here, because at least he's spreading his own talking points.
Anyone using AI to spread messages built on the backs of the labor of others
are parasites on this website and I have nothing but content for them.
In the comments section under Jiang's videos, it was nice to see so many comments from people anxious to learn.
I think that kind of enthusiasm is genuinely a good thing and it often serves people quite well in life.
But Jiang is not offering a real education.
Anyone who wants to learn about history, philosophy, or game theory would be better served by, and I hate to break this to you,
enrolling in a school and learning from an actual professor.
I know not everyone has the means to do this and there are some decent substitutes such as reading books or watching lectures from people with real credentials
who have been adequately trained to speak on these subjects.
I'm not saying you should only listen to someone on a subject if they have a doctorate in it.
I am saying that when someone is offering commentary that completely upends decades of scholarship
and fields of study that have tens of thousands of people working in research,
consider that these new ideas might not be completely invalidating entire fields of study
if they're coming from a high school teacher with an act of imagination.
I'm not saying it's impossible for that to happen,
just that it would require a lot of work.
And that level of work simply isn't being seen in Jiang's videos.
Another common type of comment I saw were people comparing the lectures
to watching some of the gun Netflix, and while I strongly disagree with that since the new
Susan of One Piece was far more entertaining than listening to a man ramble about the Freemasons
for 50 minutes, I understand the categorical difference here. A YouTube video is a great
choice if all you're looking for is entertainment. I would still argue that there are far better
sources for that on YouTube than Jang, but it's not quite as disastrous as thinking he's actually
teaching you anything. I can't help but see this eerie similarity between Jang and Jordan Peterson,
where the aesthetic of academia ramps up into a caricature of education,
where people are not getting the tools they need to thrive in the world,
but instead a perpetual daddy figure who will spoon-feed them gibberish
under the guise of bettering them intellectually.
Jordan Peterson has parlayed his public persona into creating a ridiculous fake university
that has all the aesthetics of education without any of the actual substance or value.
My good friend Zoe B has a whole video about that institution and how it uses the aesthetics of
learning to siphon money from Peterson's faithful audience.
She was the one who found that anecdote about Dr. Fox I used in my intro, so give full credit to Zoey for that.
After a decade of watching Peterson continuously bulk his audience for enough money to make him a millionaire,
I hope we don't have to see a repeat with that with Jang Shu Chen.
Although, and he did say he's working on a book, so I guess we'll be seeing that much money made off of that.
Oh, I can't wait for that. I can't wait for that, bro. I'm gonna read the fuck out of that. That's the real theory.
That's like Das Kapital, throw that shit in the fucking dustbin of history, dude.
Professor Jung, I'm a Jungist, okay?
Jungian Psychology, Jungian Predictive History, oh my god, fucking amazing.
Anyway, guys, I'm gonna go and spend some time with my family and my loved ones
after spending the day with my other loved ones.
uh... anyway happy mother's day to everybody
uh... hope you have a wonderful one and i'll be back tomorrow as always
uh... this week i'm also going to vancouver to uh... talk to the board
marty at uh... the web summit
that's taking place to get excited for that
and uh... yeah i got some other stuff coming up lined up as well of you guys
he's
of the day. All the chatter's tricklin' in, I'll sell people hay.
Sonny Los Angeles, California says a son. Stunlock to the stunlock, to the top, it's just begun.
Cause there is again a sun is streaming, a sun is streaming
There is again a sun is streaming, a sun is streaming
Maybe when a chimie is trained, tell him a kind of place.
Southern as men, chatter loves, giving greening's grace.
Zoran winning and YC, walk two back with the force.
Rogin' of the left to me, you don't him, though, still a corpse
The Charlie Kirk assassination, the fear and unlin' show
Paid full fuckin' years of this and plenty more to go
Doing fun stuff tomorrow Throw PBS up on the screen
A man-made whore reaction Brought to you by this life's dream
Cause there he is again The sun is streaming
The sun is streaming, there he is again
The sun is streaming, the sun is streaming
Can't doubt the DNC, I rel when March looked good
Committing the propaganda, to shut down people's throats
CBS Israeli News, a coup, a regime false
A full-blown fascist takeover and still the duty calls
Total radicalization coming out to sea
The system where he'll always fail, it's up to you and me
All these daily streams, weather show, or weather law